Cited by 21Animal Behavior and Welfare StudiesAnimal Nutrition and PhysiologyHuman-Animal Interaction Studies

Introduction: The science and practice of optimal animal welfare

Open access
Maple, Terry L., Bloomsmith, Mollie A.·2018·Behavioural Processes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.beproc.2017.09.012

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The zoo industry has demonstrated significant intensification of zoo-based welfare science.

    “In recent years, the zoo industry has demonstrated significant intensification of zoo-based welfare science, with research being published on a wide range of topics [9,11].”

    From The visitor effect on zoo animals: implications and opportunities for zoo animal welfare (2019) · cites this paper as [9]

    The Introduction (page not provided) describes seven welfare papers covering varied species and situations, supporting the breadth of research topics. It does not establish that zoo-based welfare science has intensified significantly in recent years across the zoo industry; the authors instead express hope for a research renaissance. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Broom DM 2011 A history of animal welfare science Acta Biotheoretica 59 2 121 137 21347723
  2. Maple TL 2016 Professor in the Zoo Red Leaf Press Fernandina Beach, FL
  3. Maple TL Bocian D 2013 Wellness as welfare Zoo Biology 32 4 363 365 23649696
  4. Maple TL Perdue BM 2013 Zoo Animal Welfare Springer Heidelberg

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Maple, T. L., & Bloomsmith, M. A.
Affiliations
  • Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
  • Emory University (US)
Corresponding author
Bloomsmith, Mollie A.
Venue
Behavioural Processes
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-11
Volume
156
Pages
1-2
ISSN
0376-6357 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2758482507
Cited by
21
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Behavioural Processes (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Yerkes National Primate Research Center
  • National Institutes of Health, Office of Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
Keywords
play behavior, animal welfare indicators, weaned piglets, social play, body weight, feeding behaviour, drinking behavior, weaning, nutritional status, play motivation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review