Cited by 28Animal Behavior and Welfare StudiesAnimal Law and WelfareConservation, Ecology, Wildlife Education

Using zoo welfare assessments to identify common issues in developing country zoos

Open access
Ward, Samantha J., Williams, Ellen, Groves, Georgina, Marsh, Simon, Morgan, David·2020·Animals

Abstract

Zoo animal welfare is a high priority for many institutions worldwide, with modern zoos now ensuring that animals are housed and cared for to the highest standards. However, in countries where this knowledge is not as available or understood, standards may be lower. The aim of this research was to investigate if there were common zoo welfare concerns across developing country zoos. Wild Welfare is a charity working globally to improve welfare for zoo animals and has an independent welfare audit that is carried out before any intervention occurs. The Wild Welfare Audit, consisting of 110 questions, covering nine topics, was completed at 11 zoos in seven developing countries (Brazil, Egypt, Libya, Indonesia, Thailand, Malaysia and Vietnam) following a Likert scale score (1-3). A principal component analysis was also performed to evaluate the audit questions. The results suggest that common areas of concern were animal behaviour, positive animal mental states and human health and safety. These themes were likely due to the lack knowledge and understanding that may be linked to historical and cultural differences. This research has helped to revise the welfare audit as well as inform future intervention strategies for improving developing country zoo animal welfare.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ani10112101

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [23]Clubb R. Mason G. A Review of the Welfare of Zoo Elephants in Europe A report commissioned by the RSPCA RSPCA West Sussex, UK 2002
  2. [25]Zoos Forum Review of Issues in Elephant Husbandry in UK Zoos in the Light of the Report by Harris et al. 2008. Defra Elephants in the UK Available online: http://www.zoocheck.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/2008-study-of-elephant-welfare-in-UK-zoos.pdf (accessed on 11 November 2020)
  3. [42]Accelerating the Publication of Peer-Reviewed Science Available online: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ (accessed on 19 May 2020)
  4. [43]Animals Animals—An Open Access Journal from MDPI Available online: https://www.mdpi.com/journal/animals (accessed on 19 May 2020)
  5. [44]JZAR: Journal of Zoo and Aquarium Research Available online: https://www.jzar.org/jzar (accessed on 19 May 2020)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ward, S. J., Williams, E., Groves, G., Marsh, S., & Morgan, D.
Affiliations
  • Nottingham Trent University (GB)
  • Wild Welfare, West Sussex RH10 1HT, UK
Corresponding author
Ward, Samantha J.
Venue
Animals
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2020-11-12
Volume
10
Issue
11
Pages
2101
ISSN
2076-2615 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3102504754
Cited by
28
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3
FWCI
3.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Animals (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Nottingham Trent University's Institutional Repository (Nottingham Trent Repository) (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Social Sciences › Law › Animal Law and Welfare
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Conservation, Ecology, Wildlife Education
Keywords
zoo animal welfare, animal behavior, health and safety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review