Cited by 16Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersPerfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety StudiesAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Excessive Object Attachment in Hoarding Disorder: Examining the Role of Interpersonal Functioning

David, Jonathan, Aluh, Deborah O., Blonner, Marika, Norberg, Melissa M.·2021·Behavior Therapy

Abstract

Excessive attachment towards possessions can be maladaptive because it can lead individuals to excessively acquire and save objects. Little is known about how attachment to objects develops and changes over time; however, interpersonal factors have been theorized to play a role. The current study examined whether interpersonal factors, specifically interpersonal attachment style and empathy, moderate changes in object attachment over time. A total of 145 participants with excessive acquiring and discarding difficulties rated their level of attachment to a novel object just after receiving it, and 1 week later. Participants also completed measures of interpersonal anxious attachment and interpersonal functioning. We found that changes in object attachment over time were moderated by interpersonal anxious attachment. Also, our findings suggested that individuals with hoarding problems are likely not impaired in their ability to empathize with others, but rather have difficulty displaying empathy in tense social situations and also have more empathy for fictional characters. Further, greater discomfort in tense social situations and greater empathy for fictional characters interacted to predict greater object attachment. Taken together, these findings indicate that individuals with an interpersonal anxious attachment style may be those at risk of forming greater attachments to objects over time. A learning history that includes inconsistent support from caregivers may result in…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.beth.2021.02.003

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Public health measures such as lockdowns and social distancing may have introduced additional interpersonal stressors, which are strongly associated with hoarding.

    “Public health measures such as lockdowns and social distancing may have introduced additional interpersonal stressors, which are also strongly associated with hoarding (e.g., David et al., 2021; Grisham et al., 2018; Norberg et al., 2020).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
David, J., Aluh, D. O., Blonner, M., & Norberg, M. M.
Affiliations
  • Macquarie University (AU)
  • University of Nigeria (NG)
Corresponding author
Norberg, Melissa M.
Venue
Behavior Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-09
Volume
52
Issue
5
Pages
1226-1236
ISSN
0005-7894 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3133272381
Cited by
16
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3
FWCI
2.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behavior Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
International OCD Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
hoarding disorder, attachment to objects, attachment anxiety, empathy, social discomfort, interpersonal functioning, caregiver support, compensatory behavior
MeSH terms
Hoarding Disorder, Anxiety, Empathy, Humans, Object Attachment, Hoarding

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review