The Nature, Timing, and Symptom Trajectories of Dropout From Transdiagnostic and Single-Diagnosis Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Anxiety Disorders
Open accessAbstract
Dropout from psychotherapy is common and can have negative effects for patients, providers, and researchers. A better understanding of when and why patients stop treatment early, as well as actionable factors contributing to dropout, has the potential to prevent it. Here, we examined dropout from a large randomized controlled trial of transdiagnostic versus single-diagnosis cognitive-behavioral treatment (CBT) for patients with anxiety disorders (n = 179; Barlow et al., 2017). We aimed to characterize the timing of and reasons for dropout and test whether participants who dropped out had different symptom trajectories than those who completed treatment. Results indicated that overall, the greatest risk of dropout was prior to the first treatment session. In single-diagnosis CBT, dropout risk was particularly elevated before the first session and after other early sessions, whereas in transdiagnostic CBT, dropout risk was low and stable before and during treatment. Participants most often dropped out due to failure to comply with study procedures or dissatisfaction with or desiring alternative treatment. Results from multilevel models showed that trajectories of anxiety symptoms did not significantly differ between dropouts and completers. These findings suggest that there may be specific time windows for targeted and timely interventions to prevent dropout from CBT.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
About 10-20% of patients drop out of exposure therapy prematurely.
“about 10–20% of patients drop out prematurely [12–14]”
From Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) therapy or supportive counseling prior to exposure therapy in patients with panic disorder: study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial (IMPROVE) (2023) · cites this paper as [14]
The Results (‘Describing treatment attendance across conditions’; page unavailable) report 20.0% dropout overall and 10.5% in transdiagnostic CBT, consistent with the stated range. But dropout was 29.2% in single-diagnosis CBT, and the Discussion says exposure was a component of those protocols; the paper does not establish a 10–20% dropout rate specifically for exposure therapy. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredDropouts are common in this population.
“Given that dropouts are common in this population [11–14]”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 44 · Cited by 37
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Barlow DH, Farchione TJ, Sauer-Zavala S, Murray Latin H, Ellard KK, Bullis JR, Bentley KH, Boettcher HT, & Cassiello-Robbins C (2018). The Unified Protocol for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders: Therapist guide. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press.
- Brown TA, & Barlow DH (2014). Anxiety and Related Disorders Interview Schedule for DSM-5 (ADIS-5L): Lifetime Version-Client Interview Schedule. Oxford University Press, Inc.
- Di Nardo PA, Brown TA, & Barlow DH (1994). Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule for DSM-IV: Lifetime Version (ADIS-IV-L). Oxford University Press.
- Foa EB, Yadin E, & Lichner TK (2012). Treating your OCD with exposure and response (ritual) prevention workbook. Oxford University Press.
- Hope DA, Heimberg RG, & Turk CL (2010). Managing social anxiety: A cognitive-behavioral therapy approach: Therapist guide. Oxford University Press.
- Zinbarg RE, Craske MG, & Barlow DH (2006). Mastery of your Anxiety and Worry (MAW): Therapist guide. Oxford University Press.
- Authors
- Bentley, K. H., Cohen, Z. D., Kim, T., Bullis, J. R., Nauphal, M., Cassiello-Robbins, C., Sauer-Zavala, S., Sbi, S., Gallagher, M. W., Farchione, T. J., & Barlow, D. H.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- Boston University (US)
- Duke Medical Center (US)
- University of Kentucky (US)
- Pacific University (US)
- University of Houston (US)
- Corresponding author
- Bentley, Kate H.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Behavior Therapy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-11
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1364-1376
- ISSN
- 0005-7894 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC8531532
- OpenAlex
- W3136349986
- Cited by
- 37
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 3
- FWCI
- 5.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Behavior Therapy (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism
- John Templeton Foundation
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of Mental Health
- Departamento Administrativo de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Keywords
- psychotherapy dropout, transdiagnostic cognitive behavioral therapy, anxiety disorders, symptom trajectories, medication adherence, patient dissatisfaction, school dropout prevention
- MeSH terms
- Anxiety Disorders, Humans, Patient Dropouts, Psychotherapy, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review