Cited by 125Prion Diseases and Protein MisfoldingAutophagy in Disease and TherapyAlzheimer's disease research and treatments

Neuronal cell death in transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (prion diseases) revisited: from apoptosis to autophagy

Liberski, Pawel P., Sikorska, Beata, Bratosiewicz-Wasik, Jolanta, Carleton Gajdusek, D., Brown, Paul·2004·The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology

Abstract

Neuronal autophagy, like apoptosis, is one of the mechanisms of the programmed cell death (PCD). In this review, we summarize the presence of autophagic vacuoles in experimentally induced scrapie, Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease and Gerstmann-Sträussler-Scheinker (GSS) syndrome. Initially, a part of the neuronal cytoplasm was sequestrated by concentric arrays of double membranes; the enclosed cytoplasm appeared relatively normal except that its density was often increased. Next, electron density of the central area dramatically increased. The membranes then proliferated within the cytoplasm in a labyrinth-like manner and the area sequestrated by these membranes enlarged into a more complex structure consisting of vacuoles, electron-dense areas and areas of normally-looking cytoplasm connected by convoluted membranes. Of note, autophagic vacuoles form not only in neuronal perikarya but also in neurites and synapses. Finally, a large area of the cytoplasm was transformed into a collection of autophagic vacuoles of different sizes. On a basis of ultrastructural studies, we suggest that autophagy plays a major role in transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSEs) and may even participate in a formation of spongiform change.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biocel.2004.04.016

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Lampert's work preceded the current view that autophagy is one of the most important phenomena observed in all prion diseases.

    “Thus, Lampert’s work preceded the current view that autophagy is one of the most important phenomena observed in all prion diseases (87, 88).”

    From Kuru (2012) · cites this paper as [87]

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 136 · Cited by 125

Authors
Liberski, P. P., Sikorska, B., Bratosiewicz-Wasik, J., Carleton Gajdusek, D., & Brown, P.
Affiliations
  • Medical University of Lodz (PL)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Liberski, Pawel P.
Venue
The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-12
Volume
36
Issue
12
Pages
2473-2490
ISSN
1357-2725 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2007554792
Cited by
125
References
136
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 7
FWCI
0.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Prion Diseases and Protein Misfolding
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Autophagy in Disease and Therapy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Keywords
neuronal cell death, prion disease, autophagy, apoptosis, autophagosomes, programmed cell death, scrapie, Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, Gerstmann-Sträussler-Scheinker disease, spongiform change, ultrastructure, neurites, synapses
MeSH terms
Animals, Autophagy, Humans, Neurons, Prions, Vacuoles, Cell Death, Prion Diseases, Apoptosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review