The value of bushmeat and other wild foods to rural households living in extreme poverty in Democratic Republic of Congo
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The 'safety net' provided by wildlife resources is often more important for the more vulnerable members of a community.
“and this 'safety net' is often more important for the more vulnerable members of a community (Allebone-Webb 2009, de Merode et al. 2004).”
From Empty forests, empty stomachs? Bushmeat and livelihoods in the Congo and Amazon Basins (2011) · cites this paper as de Merode et al. 2004
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Empty forests, empty stomachs? Bushmeat and livelihoods in the Congo and Amazon Basins
Nasi, R., Taber, A., & Van Vliet, N. (2011) · International Forestry Review · doi:10.1505/146554811798293872 · Cited by 457 · see citing works
Improving diets with wild and cultivated biodiversity from across the landscape
Powell, B., Thilsted, S. H., Ickowitz, A., Termote, C., Sunderland, T., & Herforth, A. (2015) · Food Security · doi:10.1007/s12571-015-0466-5 · Cited by 382 · see citing works
- Authors
- de Merode, E., Homewood, K., & Cowlishaw, G.
- Affiliations
- University College London (GB)
- Zoological Society of London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Cowlishaw, Guy
- Venue
- Biological Conservation
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-08
- Volume
- 118
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 573-581
- ISSN
- 0006-3207 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2064970509
- Cited by
- 339
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 45 · 2012: 20
- FWCI
- 5.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Biological Conservation (publishedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Eye Research Centre
- European Commission
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Socioeconomics of Resources and Conservation
- Keywords
- bushmeat, wild foods, extreme poverty, rural households, household income, fish, wild plants, lean season, wealth inequality, Democratic Republic of the Congo
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
