The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Matching type of livestock to desired biodiversity outcomes in pastures – a review
Open accessAbstract
From a review of the literature, we conclude that the main mechanism by which grazing livestock affect biodiversity in pastures is the creation and maintenance of sward structural heterogeneity, particularly as a result of dietary choice. We identify lack of understanding of the currencies used by animals in their foraging decisions and the spatial scale of these decisions as major constraints to better management. We conclude that there are important differences between domestic grazing animal species in their impact on grazed communities and that these can be related to differences in dental and digestive anatomy, but also, and probably more importantly, to differences in body size. Differences between breeds within species appear to be relatively minor and again largely related to body size. We conclude that there is an urgent need to understand the genetic basis of these differences and also to separate true breed effects from effects of rearing environment. We also review the economic implications of using different animal types and conclude that there is a need for more research integrating these aspects with biodiversity outcomes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hofmann, R. R. (1989) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/bf00378733 · Cited by 1,812
Effects of herbivores on grassland plant diversity
Olff, H., & Ritchie, M. E. (1998) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(98)01364-0 · Cited by 1,528
Grazing ecology and forest history
(2000) · CABI Publishing eBooks · doi:10.1079/9780851994420.0000 · Cited by 1,238
Vickery, J. A., Tallowin, J. R., Feber, R. E., Asteraki, E. J., Atkinson, P. W., Fuller, R. J., & Brown, V. K. (2001) · Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2664.2001.00626.x · Cited by 749
Agri-environment schemes do not effectively protect biodiversity in Dutch agricultural landscapes
Kleijn, D., Berendse, F., Smit, R., & Gilissen, N. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35099540 · Cited by 715
Athanasiadou, S., Kyriazakis, I., Jackson, F., & Coop, R. L. (2001) · Veterinary Parasitology · doi:10.1016/s0304-4017(01)00467-8 · Cited by 583
The Allometry of Food Intake in Grazing Ruminants
Illius, A. W., & Gordon, I. J. (1987) · The Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.2307/4961 · Cited by 550
Polyphenols and agriculture: beneficial effects of proanthocyanidins in forages
Aerts, R. J., Barry, T. N., & McNabb, W. C. (1999) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/s0167-8809(99)00062-6 · Cited by 475
Ethology of free-ranging domestic animals
Arnold, G., & Dudziński, M. L. (1978) · Virtual Defense Library (Ministerio de Defensa) · Cited by 404
Diet learning by domestic ruminants: Theory, evidence and practical implications
Provenza, F. D., & Balph, D. F. (1987) · Applied Animal Behaviour Science · doi:10.1016/0168-1591(87)90218-8 · Cited by 254
Cited by
Conservation implications of native and introduced ungulates in a changing climate.
Allred, B. W., Fuhlendorf, S. D., Hovick, T. J., Dwayne Elmore, R., Engle, D. M., & Joern, A. (2013) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.12183 · Cited by 84
Metadata
- Authors
- Rook, A. J., Dumont, B., Isselstein, J., Osoro, K., WallisDeVries, M. F., Parente, G., & Mills, J.
- Venue
- Biological Conservation
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-09
- Volume
- 119
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 137-150
- ISSN
- 0006-3207 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1987311732
- Cited by
- 532
- References
- 33
- FWCI
- 64.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Matching type of livestock to desired biodiversity outcomes in pastures – a review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.biocon.2003.11.010
- The paper
- Rook, A. J., Dumont, B., Isselstein, J., Osoro, K., WallisDeVries, M. F., Parente, G., & Mills, J. (2004). Matching type of livestock to desired biodiversity outcomes in pastures – a review. Biological Conservation. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2003.11.010
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.