Cited by 1,812Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive PhysiologyComparative Animal Anatomy StudiesEvolution and Paleontology Studies

Evolutionary steps of ecophysiological adaptation and diversification of ruminants: a comparative view of their digestive system

Hofmann, R. R.·1989·Oecologia

Abstract

A review is made of the ruminant digestive system in its morphophysiological variations and adaptations relating to foraging behaviour, digestive physiology, to interactions between plants and ruminants and to geographic and climatic diversity of ruminants' ecological niches. Evidence is provided for evolutionary trends from an extreme selectivity mainly for plant cell contents and dependence upon a fractionated fore- and hindgut fermentation, to an unselective intake of bulk roughage subjected to an efficient plant cell wall fermentation, mainly in the forestomachs. The review is based on detailed comparative morphological studies of all portions of the digestive system of 65 ruminant species from four continents. Their results are related to physiological evidence and to the classification of all extant ruminants into a flexible system of three overlapping morphophysiological feeding types: concentrate selectors (40%), grass and roughage eaters (25%) and intermediate, opportunistic, mixed feeders (35%). Several examples are discussed how ruminants of different feeding types are gaining ecological advantage and it is concluded that ruminants have achieved high levels of digestive efficiency at each evolutionary stage, (including well-documented seasonal adaptations of the digestive system) and that ruminant evolution is still going on. Deductions made from the few domesticated ruminant species may have, in the past, biased scientific evaluation of the free-ranging species' e…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf00378733

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hofmann, R. R.
Affiliations
Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen (DE)
Corresponding author
Hofmann, R. R.
Venue
Oecologia
Published
1989
Volume
78
Issue
4
Pages
443-457
ISSN
  • 0029-8549 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1939
OpenAlex
W1988033736
Cited by
1,812
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 69 · 2025: 83 · 2024: 69 · 2023: 77 · 2022: 70 · 2021: 87 · 2020: 110 · 2019: 85 · 2018: 86 · 2017: 64 · 2016: 80 · 2015: 74 · 2014: 57 · 2013: 78 · 2012: 78
FWCI
17.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Oecologia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Comparative Animal Anatomy Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
Keywords
ruminant evolution, ruminant digestive system, digestive physiology, foraging behavior, feeding type, seasonal adaptation, ecological niche, digestive efficiency, wild ruminants, habitat loss

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review