Ten thousand and increasing: is the western Arctic population of bowhead whale endangered?
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There is growing evidence of a rebounding and increasingly healthy bowhead whale population in the region.
“There is also growing evidence of a rebounding and increasingly healthy bowhead whale population in the region (Gerber et al., 2007), which bodes well for continuation of the new policy.”
From Institutional navigation of oceans governance: Lessons from Russia and the United States Indigenous multi-level whaling governance in the Arctic (2022) · cites this paper as Gerber et al., 2007
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Recovery of marine animal populations and ecosystems
Lotze, H. K., Coll, M., Magera, A. M., Ward-Paige, C., & Airoldi, L. (2011) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2011.07.008 · Cited by 429 · see citing works
York, A. M., Zdor, E., BurnSilver, S., Degai, T., Monakhova, M., Isakova, S., Petrov, A. N., & Kempf, M. (2022) · Earth System Governance · doi:10.1016/j.esg.2022.100154 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Gerber, L. R., Keller, A. C., & DeMaster, D. P.
- Affiliations
- Arizona State University (US)
- NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service Alaska Fisheries Science Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Gerber, L.R.
- ORCID
- Gerber, L.R.
- Venue
- Biological Conservation
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-07
- Volume
- 137
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 577-583
- ISSN
- 0006-3207 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2057594931
- Cited by
- 17
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 2.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Biological Conservation (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Marine animal studies overview
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Keywords
- bowhead whale, population recovery, extinction risk, delisting, Endangered Species Act, abundance estimation, process error, observation error, IUCN Red List criteria, population projections, cetacean conservation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
