Cited by 207Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecologyEcology and biodiversity studiesEcology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies

Wetland creation in agricultural landscapes: Biodiversity benefits on local and regional scales

Thiere, Geraldine, Milenkovski, Susann, Lindgren, Per-Eric, Sahlén, Göran, Berglund, Olof, Weisner, Stefan E.B.·2009·Biological Conservation

Abstract

Wetland creation aiming at a simultaneous increase in nutrient retention and species diversity in agricultural landscapes has recently become applied as a catchment-scale compensation measure for past wetland losses. Here, we evaluate if, and to what extend, dual-purpose wetlands benefit local and regional diversity of agricultural landscapes. We analysed composition and α, β, and γ diversity of aquatic macroinvertebrate assemblages among dual-purpose wetlands in an agricultural region in southwest Sweden in relation to local (water quality, wetland morphology, succession stage, proximity to other aquatic habitats) and landscape parameters (regional connectivity, wetland density). Diversity of mature agricultural ponds was used as a standard to evaluate the value of dual-purpose wetlands. Dual-purpose wetlands sustained α, β, and γ diversity similar to that of natural lentic water bodies in agricultural landscapes in the region and elsewhere. Over 80% of the overall species richness was attributed to β diversity, and each created wetland contributed to overall species accumulation. Ecosystem parameters explained 19% of the compositional variation among assemblages, but were only marginally related to diversity. Wetland density promoted α and γ diversity, while spatial heterogeneity (β) remained equally high, independent of wetland density. Our results indicate that catchment-scale wetland creation for simultaneous retention and diversity purposes benefits the biodiversity of…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biocon.2009.01.006

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Research on strategies for pond creation, pond and pondscape design, and where best to locate new ponds to maximize aquatic conservation benefits has developed significantly.

    “Research on strategies for pond creation, pond and pondscape design, and where best to locate new ponds to maximize aquatic conservation benefits has developed significantly (Thiere et al. 2009).”

    From Pond ecology and conservation: research priorities and knowledge gaps (2021) · cites this paper as Thiere et al. 2009

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Thiere, G., Milenkovski, S., Lindgren, P.-E., Sahlén, G., Berglund, O., & Weisner, S. E. B.
Affiliations
  • Linköping University (SE)
  • Halmstad University (SE)
  • Lund University (SE)
Venue
Biological Conservation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-05
Volume
142
Issue
5
Pages
964-973
ISSN
0006-3207 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2093977582
Cited by
207
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 20
FWCI
10.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biological Conservation (publishedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Ecology and biodiversity studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Keywords
wetland creation, agricultural landscapes, aquatic macroinvertebrates, beta diversity, species richness, nutrient retention, regional connectivity, farm ponds, water quality, wetland succession, landscape heterogeneity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review