Cited by 324Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecologyEcology and Vegetation Dynamics StudiesFish Ecology and Management Studies

Comparative biodiversity of aquatic habitats in the European agricultural landscape

Davies, Bella, Biggs, Jeremy, Williams, Penny, Whitfield, Mericia, Nicolet, Pascale, Sear, David, Bray, Simon, Maund, Steve·2008·Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment

Abstract

Recent evidence has begun to call into question the assumption that aquatic biodiversity is concentrated exclusively in larger rivers and lakes, instead showing that it is distributed throughout the landscape and that small waterbodies, such as ponds and ditches, make a significant contribution to biodiversity. We compared the physicochemical and aquatic biodiversity characteristics of ditches, lakes, ponds, rivers and streams in five locations in Europe in three biogeographic zones. At the individual site level (alpha diversity), rivers were found to be the most species-rich waterbodies; however, at the regional level (gamma diversity), ponds were the most species-rich aquatic habitat for both wetland plants and macroinvertebrates. In terms of rare species, ponds also had a higher rarity value, measured by a Species Rarity Index, than other habitat types, although data for this analysis were only available from the United Kingdom. The high biodiversity values of ponds suggest that they should be more central to strategies for the protection and management of aquatic biodiversity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.agee.2007.10.006

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ponds often support a greater biodiversity than other freshwater habitats such as lakes and rivers.

    “Cumulatively, ponds often support a greater biodiversity than other freshwater habitats (e.g., lakes and rivers), sustain many rare and endangered aquatic taxa, and act as important “refuges” in heavily modified landscapes (Davies et al. 2008).”

    From Pond ecology and conservation: research priorities and knowledge gaps (2021) · cites this paper as Davies et al. 2008

  • Ponds are among the most biodiverse and ecologically important freshwater habitats globally.

    “Ponds are among the most biodiverse and ecologically important freshwater habitats globally and may provide a significant opportunity to mitigate anthropogenic pressures and reverse the decline of aquatic biodiversity.”

    From Pond ecology and conservation: research priorities and knowledge gaps (2021) · cites this paper as Davies et al. 2008

  • Ponds sustain many rare and endangered aquatic taxa.

    “Cumulatively, ponds often support a greater biodiversity than other freshwater habitats (e.g., lakes and rivers), sustain many rare and endangered aquatic taxa, and act as important “refuges” in heavily modified landscapes (Davies et al. 2008).”

    From Pond ecology and conservation: research priorities and knowledge gaps (2021) · cites this paper as Davies et al. 2008

  • Ponds act as important refuges in heavily modified landscapes.

    “Cumulatively, ponds often support a greater biodiversity than other freshwater habitats (e.g., lakes and rivers), sustain many rare and endangered aquatic taxa, and act as important “refuges” in heavily modified landscapes (Davies et al. 2008).”

    From Pond ecology and conservation: research priorities and knowledge gaps (2021) · cites this paper as Davies et al. 2008

  • Freshwater habitats are not discrete entities but often exist in networks, and ubiquitous species are recorded across these freshwater habitats.

    “Freshwater habitats are not discrete entities but often exist in networks (e.g., an interconnected system of ponds, rivers, streams, and lakes; Sayer 2014), and ubiquitous species are recorded across these freshwater habitats (Davies et al. 2008).”

    From Pond ecology and conservation: research priorities and knowledge gaps (2021) · cites this paper as Davies et al. 2008

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Davies, B., Biggs, J., Williams, P., Whitfield, M., Nicolet, P., Sear, D., Bray, S., & Maund, S.
Affiliations
  • Oxford Brookes University (GB)
  • University of Southampton (GB)
  • Syngenta (Switzerland) (CH)
Corresponding author
Davies, Bella
Venue
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-05
Volume
125
Issue
1-4
Pages
1-8
ISSN
0167-8809 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1990971773
Cited by
324
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 17
FWCI
5.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, UK Government
  • Natural Environment Research Council
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
Keywords
aquatic biodiversity, agricultural landscapes, ponds, ditches, lakes, rivers, streams, aquatic plants, macroinvertebrates, species rarity, alpha diversity, gamma diversity, physicochemical properties, biodiversity conservation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review