Translocations of eight species of burrow-nesting seabirds (genera Pterodroma, Pelecanoides, Pachyptila and Puffinus: Family Procellariidae)
Abstract
Development of seabird translocation techniques is required to meet species recovery objectives, to improve conservation status, and to restore ecological processes. During 1997-2008 we undertook translocation trials on eight petrel species of four genera within the New Zealand region: common diving petrel (Pelecanoides urinatrix), fairy prion (Pachyptila turtur), grey-faced petrel (Pterodroma macroptera gouldi), Pycroft's petrel (Pterodroma pycrofti), Chatham petrel (Pterodroma axillaris), Chatham Island taiko (Magenta petrel; Pterodroma magentae), fluttering shearwater (Puffinus gavia), and Hutton's shearwater (Puffinus huttoni). A total of 1791 chicks within 5weeks of fledging were moved up to 240km, placed in artificial burrows and hand-fed until they fledged. Of these, 1546 fledged, and so far at least 68 have returned as adults to the translocation sites. Most birds were crop-fed a puree based on tinned sardines and fresh water. This diet worked well for all species regardless of their typical natural diet (planktonic crustaceans, squid, or fish) with all species fledging above or close to mean natural fledging weights.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The approach of hand- or captive-rearing chicks has been used successfully in combination with translocation in the conservation of at least 11 seabird species worldwide.
“The approach has been used successfully in combination with translocation in the conservation of at least 11 seabird species worldwide [39]–[42].”
From Hand-Rearing, Release and Survival of African Penguin Chicks Abandoned Before Independence by Moulting Parents (2014) · cites this paper as [39]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sherley, R. B., Waller, L. J., Strauss, V., Geldenhuys, D., Underhill, L. G., & Parsons, N. J. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0110794 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Translocation and hand-rearing techniques for establishing a colony of threatened albatross
DEGUCHI, T., JACOBS, J., HARADA, T., PERRIMAN, L., WATANABE, Y., SATO, F., NAKAMURA, N., OZAKI, K., & BALOGH, G. (2012) · Bird Conservation International · doi:10.1017/s0959270911000438 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
- Authors
- Miskelly, C. M., Taylor, G. A., Gummer, H., & Williams, R.
- Affiliations
- Department of Conservation (NZ)
- Corresponding author
- Miskelly, Colin M.
- Venue
- Biological Conservation
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-10
- Volume
- 142
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1965-1980
- ISSN
- 0006-3207 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2042412893
- Cited by
- 115
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 5.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Biological Conservation (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Marine animal studies overview
- Keywords
- burrow-nesting seabirds, Procellariidae, petrels, Pterodroma, Puffinus, common diving petrel, fairy prion, grey-faced petrel, artificial burrows, crop feeding, fledging success, recapture, seabird conservation, New Zealand
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review