Cited by 96Wildlife Ecology and ConservationWildlife-Road Interactions and ConservationRangeland and Wildlife Management

Characterizing properties and drivers of long distance movements by elephants (Loxodonta africana) in the Gourma, Mali

Wall, Jake, Wittemyer, George, Klinkenberg, Brian, LeMay, Valerie, Douglas-Hamilton, Iain·2013·Biological Conservation

Abstract

Wide-ranging, landscape-level movements by terrestrial herbivores are increasingly threatened globally. Understanding the ecology of spatio-temporal movement patterns is critical for conservation of wide-ranging terrestrial species and the ecosystems on which they rely. The range of the Gourma elephant population inhabiting the Sahelian eco-region near Tombouctou (Timbuktu), Mali encompasses the largest areal extent in this species (29% greater than range sizes reported in other populations). Over the course of a year, the Gourma elephants (Loxodonta africana) move in a coordinated north–south movement pattern that is relatively unique for the species. We apply two new approaches to this system to characterize space use patterns; a time-density algorithm that provides a probability surface of normalized time spent per unit grid cell of GPS tracked animals and a velocity-grid algorithm that summarizes linear movements (directions, speeds and directional similarity) in cartographic form. The derived movement vector raster was analyzed using standard clustering methods to categorize areas by movement properties. Using these techniques we inferred regions of relative ecological importance to the Gourma elephants, protection of which is essential for the preservation of this unique terrestrial movement system. Analysis suggests the observed spatio-temporal pattern is a complex function of availability of surface water, vegetation productivity (as measured using the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index, NDVI) and possibly vegetation nutrient content. The approaches and applications demonstrated here can further our understanding of the movement ecology of other wildlife landscapes and facilitate the identification of crux points for their improved management.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biocon.2012.07.019

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wall, J., Wittemyer, G., Klinkenberg, B., LeMay, V., & Douglas-Hamilton, I.
Affiliations
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • Save the Elephants (KE)
Venue
Biological Conservation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-01
Volume
157
Pages
60-68
ISSN
0006-3207 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2115770459
Cited by
96
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1
FWCI
3.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Biological Conservation (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Council
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
Keywords
Loxodonta africana, long-distance movement, Gourma, Sahel, space use, GPS tracking, NDVI, surface water availability, vegetation productivity, movement ecology, conservation management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review