The DOI matches its Crossref record; 143 of the 143 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
How urbanization is driving pollinator diversity and pollination – A systematic review
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Urban areas are growing worldwide and alter landscapes in a persistent fashion, thereby affecting biodiversity and ecosystem services such as pollination in a little understood way. Here we present a systematic review of the peer-reviewed literature to identify the drivers of urban pollinator populations and pollination. A total of 141 studies were reviewed and qualitatively analyzed. Pollinator responses to urbanization were contrasting. We contend that positive responses were often associated with urban sprawl, i.e. moderate levels of urbanization of rural, mostly agricultural land below 50% impervious surface, whereas high levels of densification with high percentages of sealed and built-up area (above 50%), largely led to pollinator declines and loss of pollination services. Further, urbanization generally reduced pollinator diversity when compared to natural or semi-natural areas, but enhanced it when compared to intensified agricultural landscapes. In addition, pollinator responses were commonly highly trait- and scale-specific. Cavity nesters and generalist species usually profited more from urbanization than ground nesters and specialists. Overall, urban pollinator communities still seem to provide sufficient pollination services to wild vegetation and crops. Pollinator diversity generally increased with the amount of urban green spaces at the landscape scale, and locally with availability of nesting resources and flowering plants. Positive effects of floral additions were largely independent of the plant’s origin, whether native or non-native. Only a few studies included landscape configuration. Likewise, abiotic urban drivers, e.g. heat island effects and air and light pollution, remain little studied. Tropical and developing regions, most heavily impacted by current and future urbanization, are strongly underrepresented. We conclude that biodiversity-friendly urbanization can make a valuable contribution to pollinator conservation, in particular in face of the continued intensification of rural agriculture.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Importance of pollinators in changing landscapes for world crops
Klein, A.-M., Vaissière, B. E., Cane, J. H., Steffan-Dewenter, I., Cunningham, S. A., Kremen, C., & Tscharntke, T. (2007) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2006.3721 · Cited by 7,176
Self-citationGlobal pollinator declines: trends, impacts and drivers
Potts, S. G., Biesmeijer, J. C., Kremen, C., Neumann, P., Schweiger, O., & Kunin, W. E. (2010) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2010.01.007 · Cited by 6,458
How many flowering plants are pollinated by animals?
Ollerton, J., Winfree, R., & Tarrant, S. (2011) · Oikos · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0706.2010.18644.x · Cited by 3,874
Mcdonald, R. I., Kareiva, P., & Forman, R. T. T. (2008) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2008.04.025 · Cited by 1,052
A meta-analysis of bees’ responses to anthropogenic disturbance
Winfree, R., Aguilar, R., Vázquez, D. P., LeBuhn, G., & Aizen, M. A. (2009) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/08-1245.1 · Cited by 1,050
The city as a refuge for insect pollinators
Hall, D. M., Camilo, G. R., Tonietto, R. K., Ollerton, J., Ahrné, K., Arduser, M., Ascher, J. S., Baldock, K. C. R., Fowler, R., Frankie, G., et al. (2017) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/cobi.12840 · Cited by 657
Where is the UK's pollinator biodiversity? The importance of urban areas for flower-visiting insects
Baldock, K. C. R., Goddard, M. A., Hicks, D. M., Kunin, W. E., Mitschunas, N., Osgathorpe, L. M., Potts, S. G., Robertson, K. M., Scott, A. V., Stone, G. N., et al. (2015) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2014.2849 · Cited by 653
Implications of agricultural transitions and urbanization for ecosystem services
Cumming, G. S., Buerkert, A., Hoffmann, E. M., Schlecht, E., von Cramon-Taubadel, S., & Tscharntke, T. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13945 · Cited by 626
Self-citationThe ecological significance of toxic nectar
Adler, L. S. (2000) · Oikos · doi:10.1034/j.1600-0706.2000.910301.x · Cited by 592
TEMPORAL DYNAMICS IN A POLLINATION NETWORK
Olesen, J. M., Bascompte, J., Elberling, H., & Jordano, P. (2008) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/07-0451.1 · Cited by 521
Metadata
- Authors
- Wenzel, A., Grass, I., Belavadi, V. V., & Tscharntke, T.
- Venue
- Biological Conservation
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-01
- Volume
- 241
- Pages
- 108321
- ISSN
- 0006-3207 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2991372462
- Cited by
- 485
- References
- 143
- FWCI
- 5.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How urbanization is driving pollinator diversity and pollination – A systematic review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108321
- The paper
- Wenzel, A., Grass, I., Belavadi, V. V., & Tscharntke, T. (2020). How urbanization is driving pollinator diversity and pollination – A systematic review. Biological Conservation. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108321
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.