The DOI matches its Crossref record; 107 of the 107 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Relationships between biodiversity and biological control in agroecosystems: Current status and future challenges
Abstract
Agricultural systems around the world are faced with the challenge of providing for the demands of a growing human population. To meet this demand, agricultural systems have intensified to produce more crops per unit area at the expense of greater inputs. Agricultural intensification, while yielding more crops, generally has detrimental impacts on biodiversity. However, intensified agricultural systems often have fewer pests than more “environmentally-friendly” systems, which is believed to be primarily due to extensive pesticide use on intensive farms. In turn, to be competitive, less-intensive agricultural systems must rely on biological control of pests. Biological pest control is a complex ecosystem service that is generally positively associated with biodiversity of natural enemy guilds. Yet, we still have a limited understanding of the relationships between biodiversity and biological control in agroecosystems, and the mechanisms underlying these relationships. Here, we review the effects of agricultural intensification on the diversity of natural enemy communities attacking arthropod pests and weeds. We next discuss how biodiversity of these communities impacts pest control, and the mechanisms underlying these effects. We focus in particular on novel conceptual issues such as relationships between richness, evenness, abundance, and pest control. Moreover, we discuss novel experimental approaches that can be used to explore the relationships between biodiversity and bio…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Additionally, these practices benefit the services of the agroecological production process, especially pollination and biological control of pests, diseases, and weeds (Altieri, 1999; Crowder and Jabbour, 2014).”
From Agroecological planning of productive systems with functional connectivity to the ecological landscape matrix: two Colombian case studies (2024) · cites this paper as Crowder and Jabbour, 2014
Citations
Cites
Solutions for a cultivated planet
Foley, J. A., Ramankutty, N., Brauman, K. A., Cassidy, E. S., Gerber, J. S., Johnston, M., Mueller, N. D., O’Connell, C., Ray, D. K., West, P. C., et al. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10452 · Cited by 8,476
EFFECTS OF BIODIVERSITY ON ECOSYSTEM FUNCTIONING: A CONSENSUS OF CURRENT KNOWLEDGE
Hooper, D. U., Chapin, F. S., Ewel, J. J., Hector, A., Inchausti, P., Lavorel, S., Lawton, J. H., Lodge, D. M., Loreau, M., Naeem, S., et al. (2005) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.1890/04-0922 · Cited by 8,046
Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity
Cardinale, B. J., Duffy, J. E., Gonzalez, A., Hooper, D. U., Perrings, C., Venail, P., Narwani, A., Mace, G. M., Tilman, D., Wardle, D. A., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11148 · Cited by 7,457 · cited 1×
“As hypothesized by Root (1973), plant diversity is often negatively associated with herbivore abundance (Cardinale et al., 2012).”
BackgroundPartitioning selection and complementarity in biodiversity experiments
Loreau, M., & Hector, A. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35083573 · Cited by 3,528
Community structure, population control, and competition.
Hairston, N. G., Smith, F. E., & Slobodkin, L. B. (1960) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/282146 · Cited by 3,492
Biodiversity and ecosystem productivity in a fluctuating environment: The insurance hypothesis
Yachi, S., & Loreau, M. (1999) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.96.4.1463 · Cited by 3,211
Farmland biodiversity: is habitat heterogeneity the key?
Benton, T. G., Vickery, J. A., & Wilson, J. D. (2003) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(03)00011-9 · Cited by 3,205
Agricultural Intensification and Ecosystem Properties
Matson, P. A., Parton, W. J., Power, A. G., & Swift, M. J. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.277.5325.504 · Cited by 3,160
Root, R. B. (1973) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.2307/1942161 · Cited by 3,023
Green Revolution: Impacts, limits, and the path ahead
Pingali, P. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0912953109 · Cited by 2,545
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Eight principles of integrated pest management
Barzman, M. S., Bàrberi, P., Birch, A. N., Boonekamp, P. M., Dachbrodt‐Saaydeh, S., Graf, B., Hommel, B., Jensen, J. E., Kiss, J. G., Kudsk, P., et al. (2015) · Agronomy for Sustainable Development · doi:10.1007/s13593-015-0327-9 · Cited by 1,044
“There are many such mechanisms by which increasing plant diversity can be taken advantage of to improve biological regulation of pests, but this approach has received more attention in tropical systems (Crowder and Jabbour 2014; Ratnadass et al. 2012).”
BackgroundLichtenberg, E. M., Kennedy, C. M., Kremen, C., Batáry, P., Berendse, F., Bommarco, R., Bosque‐Pérez, N. A., Carvalheiro, L. G., Snyder, W. E., Williams, N. M., et al. (2017) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.13714 · Cited by 483
“…services when abundance of common species that are effective ecosystem services providers increases at the expense of rare species that are functionally less important (Crowder & Jabbour, 2014), a result seen with pollinators in agricultural systems (Kleijn et al., 2015; Winfree et al., 2015).”
BackgroundSelf-citationGive predators a complement: Conserving natural enemy biodiversity to improve biocontrol
Snyder, W. E. (2019) · Biological Control · doi:10.1016/j.biocontrol.2019.04.017 · Cited by 272
Tailored flower strips promote natural enemy biodiversity and pest control in potato crops
Tschumi, M., Albrecht, M., Collatz, J., Dubsky, V., Entling, M. H., Najar‐Rodriguez, A., & Jacot, K. A. (2016) · Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2664.12653 · Cited by 239
Soil Biodiversity Integrates Solutions for a Sustainable Future
Bach, E. M., Ramirez, K. S., Fraser, T. D., & Wall, D. H. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12072662 · Cited by 217
“Crop and livestock pests and pathogens can have severe negative impacts on food production, human health, and well-being [24].”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Crowder, D. W., & Jabbour, R.
- Affiliations
- Washington State University (US)
- University of Wyoming (US)
- Corresponding author
- Crowder, David W.
- Venue
- Biological Control
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-08
- Volume
- 75
- Pages
- 8-17
- ISSN
- 1049-9644 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2150622179
- Semantic Scholar
- af6b4dd74ce0a46ba04e0efe496b9b37d2cad4f7
- Cited by
- 204
- References
- 107
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 5
- FWCI
- 10.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Biological Control (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Agriculture
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant and soil sciences
- Keywords
- biodiversity, agroecosystems, agricultural intensification, natural enemy communities, arthropod pests, weed pests, species richness, species evenness, functional diversity, genetic diversity, ecosystem services, biodiversity management, pesticide use
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
