Cited by 9Microbial Natural Products and BiosynthesisAntimicrobial Peptides and ActivitiesProbiotics and Fermented Foods

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Production optimization of antifungal lipopeptides by Bacillus subtilis CtpxS2-1 using low-cost optimized medium

Yánez-Mendizábal, Viviana, Falconí, César E., Kanaley, Kathleen·2023·Biological Control

Abstract

The aim of the present study was evaluated the use of low-cost optimized medium defatted soy flour and molasses (DSF40–MOL5; 40 g l⁻¹ defatted soy flour, 5 g l⁻¹ molasses plus mineral trace supplements) to improvement the antifungal lipopeptides production by biocontrol agent Bacillus subtilis CtpxS2-1. First, population dynamics of CtpxS2-1 in DSF40–MOL5 medium was recorded in a 5-l fermenter during 24 h, 48 h and 72 h and compared with the bacterium grown in medium optimal for lipopeptide production (MOLP) as control. Results showed that the CtpxS2-1 population dynamics, pH and oxygen consumption was similar in both media with a 4–h lag phase, followed by exponential growth and maximum production around 9.5 log CFU ml⁻¹ after 16–18 h. Second, lipopeptides extracts quantifications, followed of high-performance thin layer chromatographic (HPTLC) and bioautography analysis against Colletotrichum acutatum showed a significant increment of fengycin and iturin lipopeptides production and their antifungal activity in DSF40–MOL5 compared with MOLP. PCR (RT-PCR)/RT q-PCR analysis during production confirmed the transcription of fengycin, iturin an surfactin lipopeptides by amplification of cDNA; and that FenB and ItuA genes were progressive expressed in higher amounts throughout in DSF40–MOL5 than MOLP. The biosynthesis of FenB gene and its antifungal activity against C. acutatum was the highest for CtpxS2-1 grown in DSF40–MOL5. Surfactin genes were also expressed during production process however their didn’t showed antifungal activity Finally, treatment of artificially infected seed of three cultivars of Lupinus mutabilis with CtpxS2-1 grown in DSF40-MOL5 reduced anthracnose up to 0% and improved seed and plant health. This evidence supports that antifungal potential of B.subtilis CtpxS2-1 to control lupin anthracnose could be enhanced using low-cost medium DSF40–MOL5 and it could provide a reliable method for scaling up the bacterial fermentation process at industrial level.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2023.105306

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. Ahimou, 2000, Surfactin and iturin A effects on Bacillus subtilis surface hydrophobicity, Enzyme Microbial Technol., 10.1016/S0141-0229(00)00295-7 · DOI
  2. Akpa, 2001, Influence of culture conditions on lipopeptide production by Bacillus subtilis, Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. - Part A Enzyme Eng. Biotechnol., 551, 10.1385/ABAB:91-93:1-9:551 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Ashwini, N., Srividya, S., 2014. Potentiality of Bacillus subtilis as biocontrol agent for management of anthracnose disease of chilli caused by Colletotrichum gloeosporioides OGC1. 3 Biotech. Doi: 10.1007/s13205-013-0134-4. · DOI
  4. Banat, 2014, Cost effective technologies and renewable substrates for biosurfactants’ production, Front. Microbiol., 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00697 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Baranyi, 1994, Review Paper A dynamic approach to predicting bacterial growth in food, Int. J. Food Microbiol., 10.1016/0168-1605(94)90157-0 · DOI
  6. Cawoy, 2015, Lipopeptides as main ingredients for inhibition of fungal phytopathogens by Bacillus subtilis/amyloliquefaciens, Microb. Biotechnol., 8, 281, 10.1111/1751-7915.12238 · DOI
  7. Choudhary, 2009, Interactions of Bacillus spp. and plants - With special reference to induced systemic resistance (ISR), Microbiol. Res., 164, 493, 10.1016/j.micres.2008.08.007 · DOI
  8. Errington, 2003, Regulation of endospore formation in Bacillus subtilis, Nat. Rev. Microbiol., 10.1038/nrmicro750 · DOI
  9. Falconi, 2015, Influence of plant growth stage on resistance to anthracnose in Andean lupin (Lupinus mutabilis), Crop Pasture Sci, 10.1071/CP14104 · DOI
  10. Falconí, 2019, Solar UV-B radiation limits seedborne anthracnose infection and induces physiological and biochemical responses in Lupinus mutabilis, Plant Pathol., 68, 1635, 10.1111/ppa.13086 · DOI
  11. Falconí, 2022, Native bacillus subtilis strains efficiently control lupin anthracnose both under greenhouse and in field conditionsz, Int. J. Adv. Sci. Eng. Inf. Technol., 12, 2519, 10.18517/ijaseit.12.6.17169 · DOI
  12. Falconí, 2022, Available strategies for the management of andean lupin anthracnose, Plants, 11, 654, 10.3390/plants11050654 · DOI
  13. Falconí, C.E., Visser, R.G.F., Van Heusden, A.W., 2013. Phenotypic, molecular, and pathological characterization of colletotrichum acutatum associated with andean lupine and tamarillo in the ecuadorian andes. Doi:10.1094/PDIS-02-12-0175-RE. · DOI
  14. Feignier, 1996, Characterization of iturin synthetase in the wild-type Bacillus subtilis strain producing iturin and in an iturin deficient mutant, FEMS Microbiol. Lett., 136, 117, 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1996.tb08036.x · DOI
  15. Fravel, 2005, Commercialization and implementation of biocontrol, Annu. Rev. Phytopathol., 10.1146/annurev.phyto.43.032904.092924 · DOI
  16. Geetha, 2018, Biosurfactants: Production and potential applications in microbial enhanced oil recovery (MEOR), Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol., 14, 23, 10.1016/j.bcab.2018.01.010 · DOI
  17. Gotor-Vila, 2017, Biocontrol products based on Bacillus amyloliquefaciens CPA-8 using fluid-bed spray-drying process to control postharvest brown rot in stone fruit, LWT, 10.1016/j.lwt.2017.04.034 · DOI
  18. Guo, 2018, The PhoR/PhoP two-component system regulates fengycin production in Bacillus subtilis NCD-2 under low-phosphate conditions, J. Integr. Agric., 17, 149, 10.1016/S2095-3119(17)61669-1 · DOI
  19. Jacques, P., Hbid, C., Destain, J., Razafindralambo, H., Paquot, M., De Pauw, E., Thonart, P., 1999. Optimization of Biosurfactant Lipopeptide Production from Bacillus subtilis S499 by Plackett-Burman Design. · DOI
  20. Jacques, P., 2011. In: Soberon Chávez, G. (Ed.). In: Biosurfactants: From Genes to Applications, 20. Microbiology Monographs, pp. 57–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14490-5_3. · DOI · Paper page
  21. Jasim, 2016, Surfactin, Iturin, and Fengycin Biosynthesis by Endophytic Bacillus sp. from Bacopa monnieri, Microb. Ecol., 72, 106, 10.1007/s00248-016-0753-5 · DOI
  22. Jordan, 2006, Regulation of LiaRS-dependent gene expression in Bacillus subtilis: Identification of inhibitor proteins, regulator binding sites, and target genes of a conserved cell envelope stress-sensing two-component system, J. Bacteriol., 10.1128/JB.00310-06 · DOI
  23. Joshi, 2008, Production of biosurfactant and antifungal compound by fermented food isolate Bacillus subtilis 20B, Bioresour. Technol., 10.1016/j.biortech.2007.07.030 · DOI
  24. Marahier, 1993, Regulation of peptide antibiotic production in Bacillus, Mol. Microbiol., 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1993.tb01154.x · DOI
  25. Mohsin, M.Z., Omer, R., Huang, J., Mohsin, A., Guo, M., Qian, J., Zhuang, Y., 2021. Advances in engineered Bacillus subtilis biofilms and spores, and their applications in bioremediation, biocatalysis, and biomaterials. Synth. Syst. Biotechnol. Doi:10.1016/j.synbio.2021.07.002. · DOI
  26. Ongena, 2008, Bacillus lipopeptides: versatile weapons for plant disease biocontrol, Trends Microbiol, 10.1016/j.tim.2007.12.009 · DOI
  27. Ongena, 2007, Surfactin and fengycin lipopeptides of Bacillus subtilis as elicitors of induced systemic resistance in plants, Environ. Microbiol., 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01202.x · DOI
  28. Pathania, 2020, Role of plant growth-promoting bacteria in sustainable agriculture, Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol., 30, 10.1016/j.bcab.2020.101842 · DOI
  29. Rahman, 2021, Molecular genetics of surfactin and its effects on different sub-populations of Bacillus subtilis, Biotechnol. Reports., 10.1016/j.btre.2021.e00686 · DOI
  30. Roongsawang, 2011, Diversity of nonribosomal peptide synthetases involved in the biosynthesis of lipopeptide biosurfactants, Int. J. Mol. Sci.
  31. Sajitha, 2016, Quantification of antifungal lipopeptide gene expression levels in Bacillus subtilis B1 during antagonism against sapstain fungus on rubberwood, Biol. Control, 96, 78, 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2016.02.007 · DOI
  32. Tabbene, 2009, Optimization of medium composition for the production of antimicrobial activity by Bacillus subtilis B38, Biotechnol. Prog., 25, 1267, 10.1002/btpr.202 · DOI
  33. Tan, 2022, Increasing fengycin production by strengthening the fatty acid synthesis pathway and optimizing fermentation conditions, Biochem. Eng. J., 177, 10.1016/j.bej.2021.108235 · DOI
  34. Yánez-Mendizábal, 2018, Efficacy of Bacillus spp. to biocontrol of anthracnose and enhance plant growth on Andean lupin seeds by lipopeptide production, Biol. Control, 122, 67, 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2018.04.004 · DOI
  35. Yánez-Mendizábal, 2021, Bacillus subtilis CtpxS2-1 induces systemic resistance against anthracnose in Andean lupin by lipopeptide production, Biotechnol. Lett., 10.1007/s10529-020-03066-x · DOI
  36. Yánez-Mendizábal, 2012, Production of the postharvest biocontrol agent Bacillus subtilis CPA-8 using low cost commercial products and by-products, Biol. Control, 60, 280, 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2011.12.001 · DOI
  37. Yánez-Mendizábal, 2012, Biological control of peach brown rot (Monilinia spp.) by Bacillus subtilis CPA-8 is based on production of fengycin-like lipopeptides, Eur. J. Plant Pathol., 132, 609, 10.1007/s10658-011-9905-0 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Zhang, 1999, Chemically defined media for commercial fermentations, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 51, 407, 10.1007/s002530051411 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 9

Metadata

Authors
Yánez-Mendizábal, V., Falconí, C. E., & Kanaley, K.
Affiliations
  • Universidad de las Fuerzas Armadas ESPE (EC)
  • Fordham University (US)
Venue
Biological Control
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-10
Volume
185
Pages
105306
ISSN
1049-9644 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4385076189
Cited by
9
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1
FWCI
1.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Biological Control (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology › Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Antimicrobial Peptides and Activities
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
Keywords
Bacillus subtilis, antifungal lipopeptides, fengycin, iturin, surfactin, low-cost fermentation medium, defatted soy flour, molasses, Colletotrichum acutatum, Lupinus mutabilis, biological control agents, seed treatment, fermentation optimization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review