Cited by 22Microbial Inactivation MethodsViral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in InsectsMedical Device Sterilization and Disinfection

Effectiveness of mouse minute virus inactivation by high temperature short time treatment technology: A statistical assessment

Murphy, Marie, Quesada, Guillermo Miro, Chen, Dayue·2011·Biologicals

Abstract

Viral contamination of mammalian cell cultures in GMP manufacturing facility represents a serious safety threat to biopharmaceutical industry. Such adverse events usually require facility shutdown for cleaning/decontamination, and thus result in significant loss of production and/or delay of product development. High temperature short time (HTST) treatment of culture media has been considered as an effective method to protect GMP facilities from viral contaminations. Log reduction factor (LRF) has been commonly used to measure the effectiveness of HTST treatment for viral inactivation. However, in order to prevent viral contaminations, HTST treatment must inactivate all infectious viruses (100%) in the medium batch since a single virus is sufficient to cause contamination. Therefore, LRF may not be the most appropriate indicator for measuring the effectiveness of HTST in preventing viral contaminations. We report here the use of the probability to achieve complete (100%) virus inactivation to assess the effectiveness of HTST treatment. By using mouse minute virus (MMV) as a model virus, we have demonstrated that the effectiveness of HTST treatment highly depends upon the level of viral contaminants in addition to treatment temperature and duration. We believe that the statistical method described in this report can provide more accurate information about the power and potential limitation of technologies such as HTST in our shared quest to mitigate the risk of viral contamina…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biologicals.2011.07.001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • At the end of Q3 2019, more than 1,052 advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMPs) were being tested in phase I-III clinical trials and several cell and gene therapies had received regulatory approval.

    “At the end of Q3, 2019, more than 1,052 advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMPs) were being tested in phase I-III clinical trials (https://alliancerm.org/publication/q3-2019-data-report/) and several cell 45 and gene 46 therapies had received regulatory approval.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Murphy, M., Quesada, G. M., & Chen, D.
Affiliations
Eli Lilly (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Chen, Dayue
Venue
Biologicals
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-11
Volume
39
Issue
6
Pages
438-443
ISSN
1045-1056 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1974068274
Cited by
22
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biologicals (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biotechnology › Microbial Inactivation Methods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Viral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Medical Device Sterilization and Disinfection
Keywords
high-temperature short-time treatment, virus inactivation
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Animals, Cell Line, Culture Media, Disinfection, Drug Contamination, Hot Temperature, Humans, Kinetics, Minute Virus of Mice, Technology, Pharmaceutical, Time Factors, Virus Replication, Reproducibility of Results, Virus Inactivation, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review