Cited by 212Viral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in InsectsProtein purification and stabilityVirus-based gene therapy research

Viral contamination in biologic manufacture and implications for emerging therapies

Open access
Barone, Paul W., Wiebe, Michael E., Leung, James C., Hussein, Islam T. M., Keumurian, Flora J., Bouressa, James, Brussel, Audrey, Chen, Dayue +26 more·2020·Nature Biotechnology

Abstract

Recombinant protein therapeutics, vaccines, and plasma products have a long record of safety. However, the use of cell culture to produce recombinant proteins is still susceptible to contamination with viruses. These contaminations cost millions of dollars to recover from, can lead to patients not receiving therapies, and are very rare, which makes learning from past events difficult. A consortium of biotech companies, together with the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, has convened to collect data on these events. This industry-wide study provides insights into the most common viral contaminants, the source of those contaminants, the cell lines affected, corrective actions, as well as the impact of such events. These results have implications for the safe and effective production of not just current products, but also emerging cell and gene therapies which have shown much therapeutic promise. The Consortium on Adventitious Agent Contamination in Biomanufacturing (CAACB) provides a comprehensive and forward-looking overview of industry’s experience with viral contamination of cell cultures used to produce recombinant proteins.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This Perspective reports the CAACB industry survey of viral contamination in mammalian cell culture biomanufacturing, identifying 18 directly reported events among 20 companies and 26 total when combined with published reports. It concludes that current prevention, testing, and clearance controls have kept recombinant protein products safe, but testing alone is insufficient, and emerging cell/gene therapies—especially autologous cell therapies—will rely mainly on contamination prevention because viral clearance is largely incompatible.

Key findings

  • Of 20 CAACB member companies surveyed, 9 (45%) reported at least one adventitious virus contamination in mammalian cell culture since 1985, totaling 18 events; combined with published reports, the paper cites 26 virus contaminations over 36 years.
  • CHO cells accounted for 67% of reported events and human/primate cells 33%; no overlap existed between the four viruses contaminating CHO culture and the five contaminating human/primate cells, and four of five human/primate viruses are known human pathogens versus one CHO virus (Cache Valley virus).
  • Raw materials/media components were identified or suspected in 11 of 12 CHO contaminations, while operators or the cell line itself were suspected for human/primate cells; direct testing detected the contaminant in only 3 of 11 raw-material-source events, and only after concentration or biological amplification.
  • The in vitro virus (IVV) assay was negative in 4 of 14 (28.6%) contaminated runs reported to the CAACB; downstream purification reduced contaminating virus below the limit of detection in all evaluated cases, no drug substance from a contaminated culture was released for human use, and investigation costs were $1–10 million, with worst cases in the hundreds of millions and median plant downtime of one to two months.

Methods

  • A 166-question survey of CAACB members collected data from 20 major biopharmaceutical manufacturers on virus contaminations and controls in mammalian cell culture manufacturing, covering pilot to commercial scale and GMP/non-GMP operations.
  • The scope excluded bacterial or yeast fermentation, plasma fractionation, and egg-based vaccine production; CAACB-reported data were consolidated with published reports of virus contamination events.
  • Analysis was descriptive, summarizing contaminating viruses, host cell lines, suspected sources, detection methods, extent of contamination, downstream clearance, corrective actions, and business impacts.

Limitations

  • The paper states that contamination events are rare, with only 26 known over 36 years and 18 reported directly to the CAACB; all reported events occurred at North American and European sites, but there was insufficient data to determine geographic risk differences.
  • The paper states that it could not determine whether one operational mode carries higher contamination risk, and that the HTST media-treatment observation rests on a small sample of four manufacturers.
  • Evident from the text: the dataset is retrospective and largely self-reported by member companies, may undercount unrecognized non-GMP or unreported events, and lacks a manufacturing-volume denominator, so per-company rates cannot be directly normalized to total processed volume.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41587-020-0507-2

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

13 of 62 cited sources checked · 4 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation
    § Viral contamination in biologic manufacture and implications for emerging therapies

    In the early 1980s, unknowingly contaminated therapeutic proteins from human plasma caused widespread transmission of viruses such as HIV to people with haemophilia who received these treatments.

    “In the early 1980's, unknowingly contaminated therapeutic proteins from human plasma caused widespread transmission of viruses, such as human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), to people with haemophilia who received these treatments 5,6 .”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [5] Rosendaal, F. R., Smit, C. & Briët, E. Hemophilia treatment in historical perspective: a review of medical and social developments. Ann. Hematol. 62, 5–15 (1991). source
    • cites [6] Weinberg, P. D. et al. Legal, financial, and public health consequences of HIV contamination of blood and blood products in the 1980s and 1990s. Ann. Intern. Med. 136, 312–319 (2002). source
  • Premisecitation
    § Viral contamination in biologic manufacture and implications for emerging therapies

    Viruses are of particular concern as contaminants because they are often more difficult to detect than other microbial contaminants.

    “Viruses are of particular concern as they are often more difficult to detect than other microbial contaminants 1 .”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [1] Merten, O. W. Virus contaminations of cell cultures — a biotechnological view. Cytotechnology 39, 91–116 (2002). source
  • Premisecitation
    § Viral contamination in biologic manufacture and implications for emerging therapies

    In the 20th century, several vaccine products were unintentionally contaminated with unwanted viruses during their production.

    “In the 20 th century several vaccine products were unintentionally contaminated with unwanted viruses during their production [1][2][3] .”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [1] Merten, O. W. Virus contaminations of cell cultures — a biotechnological view. Cytotechnology 39, 91–116 (2002). source
    • cites [2] Sawyer, W. A. et al. Jaundice in army personnel in the western region of the United States and its relation to vaccination against yellow fever: Part I. Am. J. Epidemiol. 39, 337–430 (1944). source
    • cites [3] Shah, K. & Nathanson, N. Human exposure to SV40: review and comment. Am. J. Epidemiol. 103, 1–12 (1976). source
  • Premisecitation
    § Viral contamination in biologic manufacture and implications for emerging therapies

    To ensure that current plasma-derived, vaccine, and recombinant biotherapeutics are safe, complementary safety strategies to reduce the risk of virus contamination were developed and implemented.

    “To ensure that current plasmaderived, vaccine, and recombinant biotherapeutics are safe, complementary safety strategies to reduce the risk of virus contamination were developed and implemented [9][10][11] .”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [9] International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use. Q5A(R1). Viral Safety Evaluation Of Biotechnology Products Derived From Cell Lines Of Human Or Animal Origin (International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use, 1999).

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [10] Suomela, H. Inactivation of viruses in blood and plasma products. Transfus. Med. Rev. 7, 42–57 (1993). source
    • cites [11] Burnouf, T. Modern plasma fractionation. Transfus. Med. Rev. 21, 101–117 (2007). source

      The “Testing of Pathogenic Agents” section (page unavailable) describes complementary safeguards for plasma-derived products, and “Core Viral Reduction Methods” describes implemented viral inactivation and removal steps. The cited paper does not establish that these strategies were developed and implemented for vaccines or recombinant biotherapeutics. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation
    § Contamination prevention.

    Developing media formulations that do not require animal- or human-sourced raw materials is used in the recombinant protein manufacturing industry.

    “A better strategy, also used in the recombinant protein manufacturing industry, is to develop media formulations that do not require animal-or human-sourced raw materials 58 .”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [58] Khan, A. S. et al. A multicenter study to evaluate the performance of high-throughput sequencing for virus detection. mSphere 2, e00307–17 (2017). source

      The Materials and Methods (Cells; page not provided) describe media containing fetal bovine serum, while the Discussion concerns virus-detection methods. Searches for animal- or human-source-free media formulations and their use in recombinant protein manufacturing found no passage addressing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims. 43
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 22
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Viral contamination in biologic manufacture and implications for emerging therapies

    Current best practice relies on three pillars: selection of appropriate starting and raw materials with a low risk of adventitious virus; testing of cell banks and in-process materials to ensure they are free from detectable viruses; and incorporation of steps to remove and inactivate potential undetected adventitious and endogenous viral contaminants during purification.

    “The lessons of the past have led to the current best practice, which relies on three pillars: the selection of appropriate starting and raw materials with a low risk of containing adventitious virus; testing of cell banks and in process materials to ensure they are free from detectable viruses; and finally, the incorporation of steps to remove and inactivate potential undetected adventitious and”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [9] International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use. Q5A(R1). Viral Safety Evaluation Of Biotechnology Products Derived From Cell Lines Of Human Or Animal Origin (International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use, 1999).

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [13] Grillberger, L., Kreil, T. R., Nasr, S. & Reiter, M. Emerging trends in plasma-free manufacturing of recombinant protein therapeutics expressed in mammalian cells. Biotechnol. J. 4, 186–201 (2009). source

      Split into 3 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 2 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [14] Kozlowski, S. & Swann, P. Current and future issues in the manufacturing and development of monoclonal antibodies. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 58, 707–722 (2006). source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Implications for cell and gene therapy manufacturers

    At the end of Q3 2019, more than 1,052 advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMPs) were being tested in phase I-III clinical trials and several cell and gene therapies had received regulatory approval.

    “At the end of Q3, 2019, more than 1,052 advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMPs) were being tested in phase I-III clinical trials (https://alliancerm.org/publication/q3-2019-data-report/) and several cell 45 and gene 46 therapies had received regulatory approval.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites https://alliancerm.org/publication/q3-2019-data-report/

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [45] Murphy, M., Quesada, G. M. & Chen, D. Effectiveness of mouse minute virus inactivation by high temperature short time treatment technology: a statistical assessment. Biologicals 39, 438–443 (2011). source
    • cites [46] Meunier, S. M., Sasges, M. R. & Aucoin, M. G. Evaluating ultraviolet sensitivity of adventitious agents in biopharmaceutical manufacturing. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 44, 893–909 (2017). source

      The citation is attached to the statement that cell therapies had received regulatory approval; the Q3 2019 trial count is attributed to a separate URL. The Introduction and Discussion and conclusions address contamination and UV disinfection in biopharmaceutical manufacturing, not approvals of cell therapies. Searches for approved cell therapies and regulatory approval found no supporting passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation
    § Different host cells, different risks.

    Four of the five viruses found to contaminate human and primate cell lines are known to be pathogenic in humans, whereas only one of the viruses found to contaminate CHO cell culture has been reported to cause disease in humans.

    “In terms of safety implications, four (herpesvirus, human adenovirus type 1, parainfluenza virus type 3, and reovirus type 3) of the five viruses found to contaminate human and primate cell lines are known to be pathogenic in humans, whereas only one (Cache Valley virus) of the viruses found to contaminate CHO cell culture has been reported to cause disease in humans 36,37 .”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [36] Anonymous. A united front. Nature 472, 389–390 (2011).

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [37] Campbell, G. L. et al. Second human case of Cache Valley virus disease. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 12, 854–856 (2006). source

      The Conclusions report a fatal, culture-confirmed case of Cache Valley virus encephalitis in a human, supporting the claim that this virus can cause human disease. The paper does not establish that Cache Valley virus contaminated CHO cell culture, that it was the only such contaminant reported to cause human disease, or the comparison with viruses contaminating human and primate cell lines. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Different host cells, different risks.

    Animal-derived raw materials, especially serum, carry a relatively higher risk of being contaminated with virus and are thus being replaced where possible throughout the industry.

    “Animal-derived raw materials (ADRMs), especially serum, carry a relatively higher risk of being contaminated with virus and are thus being replaced where possible throughout the industry 1,9,13 .”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [1] Merten, O. W. Virus contaminations of cell cultures — a biotechnological view. Cytotechnology 39, 91–116 (2002). source

      The paper's introductory overview identifies contaminated raw materials as a route by which cell cultures acquire viruses, and its references include reports of viral contamination in calf serum. The passages retrieved do not establish that animal-derived materials pose a relatively higher risk than alternatives or that they are being replaced throughout the industry. (LLM, conf=0.73)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [9] International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use. Q5A(R1). Viral Safety Evaluation Of Biotechnology Products Derived From Cell Lines Of Human Or Animal Origin (International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use, 1999).

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [13] Grillberger, L., Kreil, T. R., Nasr, S. & Reiter, M. Emerging trends in plasma-free manufacturing of recombinant protein therapeutics expressed in mammalian cells. Biotechnol. J. 4, 186–201 (2009). source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Contamination prevention.

    For recombinant viruses, master virus banks (MVBs) are generated and thoroughly characterized for contamination by adventitious viruses.

    “For recombinant viruses, master virus banks (MVBs) are generated and thoroughly characterized for contamination by adventitious viruses 52 .”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [52] Shukla, A. A. & Aranha, H. Viral clearance for biopharmaceutical downstream processes. Pharm. Bioprocess. 3, 127–138 (2015). source

      The risk-assessment discussion (p. 128) says master and working cell banks are extensively tested for viral contamination. It does not say that master virus banks are generated or characterized for recombinant viruses; cell banks and virus banks are distinct. (LLM, conf=0.78)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Contamination prevention.

    HTS of viral RNA has been used to demonstrate a virus is biologically active.

    “Additionally, determining if the contaminant identified in a nucleic acid based assay is biologically active may require a different method, though we would note that HTS of viral RNA has been used to demonstrate a virus is biologically active 61 .”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [61] Miki, H. & Takagi, M. Design of serum-free medium for suspension culture of CHO cells on the basis of general commercial media. Cytotechnology 67, 689–697 (2015). source

      The Cells and Discussion sections describe CHO cell culture and growth, not viral testing. Searches of our full-text copy for HTS of viral RNA and high-throughput sequencing of viral contaminants found no passage addressing whether viral RNA sequencing can demonstrate biological activity. No page numbers were available in the indexed passages. (LLM, conf=0.78)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Current viral safety approaches work

    For GMP production, five of eight cell cultures preceding the reactor were originally identified as contaminated; one of six concurrent seed trains and no concurrent cell cultures for different products were also found to be contaminated.

    “For GMP production, five of eight cell cultures preceding the reactor were originally identified as contaminated; one of six concurrent seed trains and no concurrent cell cultures for different products were also found to be contaminated.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Virus detection methods

    The IVV assay was negative in four events and the contamination was detected by using another method.

    “Despite this, the IVV assay was negative in four events and the contamination was detected by using another method (Table 3).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Contamination costs and the benefit of prevention

    Viral contaminations have been reported to lead to manufacturing interruptions with a median plant downtime of one to two months, loss of revenue, discarded batches, lawsuits against the company, a decrease in company reputation as reflected in stock value, and significant delays in product development.

    “Further, viral contaminations have been reported to lead to manufacturing interruptions (with a median plant downtime of one to two months, Fig. 3), loss of revenue, discarded batches, lawsuits against the company, a decrease in company reputation as reflected in stock value, as well as significant delays in product development.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § The CAACB virus contamination in biomanufacturing study

    Nine out of the 20 responding companies reported having one or more adventitious virus contaminations in mammalian cell culture operations since 1985, totaling 18 virus contamination events reported to the CAACB.

    “Nine out of the 20 responding companies (i.e., almost half of the involved industry respondents), reported having one or more adventitious virus contaminations in mammalian cell culture operations since 1985, totaling 18 virus contamination events reported to the CAACB.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The CAACB member-reported contamination events are comprehensive and representative of virus contaminations in mammalian cell culture biomanufacturing.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation
    § Viral contamination in biologic manufacture and implications for emerging therapies

    The authors are aware of only 26 virus contaminations over the past 36 years, 18 of which were reported directly as part of this study.

    “These events are rare; we are aware of only 26 virus contaminations over the past 36 years (Table 1) [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34] , 18 of which were reported directly as a part of this study.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [18] Burstyn, D. G. Contamination of genetically engineered Chinese hamster ovary cells. Dev. Biol. Stand. 88, 199–203 (1996).
    • cites [19] Rabenau, H. et al. Contamination of genetically engineered CHO-cells by epizootic haemorrhagic disease virus (EHDV). Biologicals 21, 207–214 (1993). source
    • cites [20] Garnick, R. L. Experience with viral contamination in cell culture. Dev. Biol. Stand. 88, 49–56 (1996).
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning
    § New insights from the CAACB study for recombinant proteins

    The number of contaminations reported to the CAACB per company does not correlate with total manufacturing volume, implying that a combination of circumstance, manufacturing controls in place, and prior lack of virus contamination disclosures may have contributed to this rate.

    “However, the number of contaminations reported to the CAACB per company does not correlate with total manufacturing volume, implying that a combination of circumstance, manufacturing controls in place, and prior lack of virus contamination disclosures may have contributed to this rate.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § New insights from the CAACB study for recombinant proteins

    Only after the viral load was increased to a detectable level, through concentration or biological amplification, was the virus detected in the raw material, and then only in three events.

    “Only after the viral load was increased to a detectable level, through concentration or biological amplification, was the virus detected in the raw material, and then only in three events (Fig. 1).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Different host cells, different risks.

    Despite raw materials being determined to be the most likely source of contamination in 11 events, testing those raw materials did not necessarily detect the contaminating virus.

    “Despite the fact that raw materials were determined to be the most likely source of the contamination in 11 events, testing those raw materials did not necessarily detect the contaminating virus.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Different host cells, different risks.

    For human and primate cell lines, the manufacturing operators or the cell line itself were suspected to be the source of contamination.

    “In comparison, for the human and primate cell lines, the manufacturing operators or cell line itself were suspected to be the source.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Different host cells, different risks.

    The reported virus contaminations occurred at all stages of the product life-cycle, with three events during pre-clinical non-GMP manufacture, two during clinical cGMP manufacture, and the remaining 13 during commercial manufacture.

    “The reported virus contaminations occurred at all stages of the product life-cycle, with three events occurring during pre-clinical non-GMP manufacture, two during clinical cGMP manufacture, and the remaining 13 occurring during commercial manufacture.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § New insights from the CAACB study for recombinant proteins

    Of the 20 companies completing the CAACB virus contamination survey, 45% of respondents had reported experiencing at least one virus contamination event between 1985 and 2018, which is higher than expected when the study began.

    “Of the 20 companies completing the CAACB virus contamination survey, 45% of respondents had reported experiencing at least one virus contamination event between 1985 and 2018, which is higher than expected when the study began.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Virus detection methods

    In two events, there was no apparent change in cell culture performance and the contaminating virus was only detected by a virus-specific PCR assay.

    “However, in two events, there was no apparent change in cell culture performance and the contaminating virus was only detected by a virusspecific PCR assay.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning
    § Viral contamination in biologic manufacture and implications for emerging therapies

    Because of the current approach, recombinant DNA-produced therapeutic proteins have been safe for over 35 years, and to the authors' knowledge there has been no transmission of a contaminating virus to a patient from such a product.

    “Because of this approach, these products have been safe for over 35 years, and to our knowledge, there has been no transmission of a contaminating virus to a patient from a therapeutic protein produced using recombinant DNA technology.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The safety record of recombinant DNA-produced therapeutic proteins is due to the current three-pillar safety approach rather than to other factors.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given
    § Contamination costs and the benefit of prevention

    The expense of investigating a contamination, as reported to the CAACB, was in the $1-10 million range, but in the worst cases the cost of investigating a contamination, implementing corrective actions, decontaminating the facility, and other ancillary costs could be in the hundreds of millions.

    “The expense of such an investigation, as reported to the CAACB, was in the $1-10 million range, but in the worst cases the cost of investigating a contamination, implementing corrective actions, decontaminating the facility, and other ancillary costs could be in the hundreds of millions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Different host cells, different risks.

    In 67% of reported events, the manufacturing platform was Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells, whereas the other 33% of events involved human or primate cell lines.

    “In 67% of reported events, the manufacturing platform was Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells, whereas the other 33% of events involved human or primate cell lines.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingnone given
    § New insights from the CAACB study for recombinant proteins

    When a viral contaminant matched a PCR target, this was effective at preventing contamination of the entire manufacturing facility.

    “When a viral contaminant matched a PCR target, this was effective at preventing contamination of the entire manufacturing facility.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning
    § Different host cells, different risks.

    In the other eight contamination events, virus testing of raw materials was negative and the source of the contamination was only identified using indirect evidence.

    “In the other eight contamination events, virus testing of raw materials was negative and the source of the contamination was only identified using indirect evidence.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Source attributions based on indirect evidence correctly identify the raw material as the source of contamination.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given
    § Current viral safety approaches work

    In all cases reported to the CAACB, no drug substance produced from a contaminated cell culture was ever released for human use, and all such drug substance was subsequently destroyed.

    “It is important to note that in all cases reported to the CAACB no drug substance produced from a contaminated cell culture was ever released for human use, and all such drug substance was subsequently destroyed.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Contamination prevention.

    The control of raw materials by direct testing had limited value, either due to virus concentrations in the raw material being below the assay detection limit, or because the contaminating virus was not homogeneously distributed in the raw material.

    “Our study showed that the control of raw materials by direct testing had limited value (Fig. 1), either due to virus concentrations in the raw material being below the assay detection limit, or because the contaminating virus was not homogeneously distributed in the raw material.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Fig. 1

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Conclusions

    The CAACB study has identified five viruses that have been shown to contaminate CHO cell culture, and four viruses that have contaminated cell culture with human or primate cells.

    “The CAACB study has identified five viruses that have been shown to contaminate CHO cell culture, and four viruses that have contaminated cell culture with human or primate cells.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Table 2

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Conclusions

    For 7 events, the contamination was contained in the cell culture, for 6 events the contamination was spread to downstream purification operations, and for 5 events the extent of contamination was unknown.

    “Reovirus / Unknown 34 events, the contamination was contained in the cell culture, for 6 events the contamination was spread to downstream purification operations, and for 5 events the extent of contamination was unknown.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Fig. 2

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Findingnone given
    § Conclusions

    The work presented here represents the first comprehensive collection and analysis of previously unpublished industry wide viral contamination information.

    “Whereas learning from these events has historically been a challenge, the work presented here represents the first comprehensive collection and analysis of previously unpublished industry wide viral contamination information.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Viral contamination in biologic manufacture and implications for emerging therapies

    Despite the excellent safety record, viral infection of mammalian cell culture is a real risk with severe consequences.

    “Despite this excellent safety record, viral infection of mammalian cell culture is a real risk with severe consequences.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Viral contamination in biologic manufacture and implications for emerging therapies

    Poliovirus vaccine was contaminated with Simian Virus 40 (SV40), and the health impacts of that contamination were not fully known for many decades.

    “This included the contamination of poliovirus vaccine with Simian Virus 40 (SV40) 3 , for which the health impacts were not fully known for many decades 4 .”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [3] Shah, K. & Nathanson, N. Human exposure to SV40: review and comment. Am. J. Epidemiol. 103, 1–12 (1976). source
    • cites [4] Stratton, K., Alamario, D. A. & McCormick, M. C. Immunization Safety Review: SV40 Contamination of Polio Vaccine and Cancer. (National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2003).
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § New insights from the CAACB study for recombinant proteins

    Different host cells may require the consideration and management of different virus contamination risks, with human and primate cell lines being more susceptible to contamination from operators.

    “The implication is that different host cells may require the consideration and management of different virus contamination risks, with human and primate cell lines being more susceptible to contamination from operators.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data
    § Current viral safety approaches work

    Current manufacturing controls used to prevent the spread of a potential contaminant within manufacturing facilities are effective, as no cross-contamination of other concurrent manufacturing operations was reported.

    “Data collected as a part of the CAACB study indicate that current manufacturing controls used to prevent the spread of a potential contaminant within manufacturing facilities are effective as no cross-contamination of other concurrent manufacturing operations was reported.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The absence of reported cross-contamination in the CAACB data indicates that cross-contamination controls are effective.
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Different host cells, different risks.

    CHO cells are the most commonly used host cells by the recombinant biologic industry, with published reports indicating that approximately 70% of approved biotech products are manufactured using CHO.

    “This result is not unexpected as CHO cells are the most commonly used host cells by the recombinant biologic-industry with published reports indicating that approximately 70% of approved biotech products are manufactured using CHO 12 .”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [12] Walsh, G. Biopharmaceutical benchmarks 2014. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 992–1000 (2014). source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § New insights from the CAACB study for recombinant proteins

    The IVV assay takes 14 to 28 days, which is much too long to assess the reactor for contamination prior to processing downstream for purification.

    “The IVV assay also takes 14 to 28 days-much too long to assess the reactor for contamination prior to processing downstream for purification.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation
    § Virus detection methods

    The in vitro virus (IVV) assay is a cell-based assay used to test harvest cell culture samples for potential viral contaminants.

    “The in vitro virus (IVV) assay is a cell-based assay used to test harvest cell culture samples for potential viral contaminants 38 .”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [38] Sexton, D. J. et al. Life-threatening Cache Valley virus infection. N. Engl. J. Med. 336, 547–549 (1997). source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given
    § Different host cells, different risks.

    Minute virus of mice is especially challenging as a potential contaminant because it is shed from ever-present wild mouse populations, may not be detectable even with established rodent control, and can persist in the environment and in raw materials long after being shed.

    “Minute virus of mice is especially challenging as a potential contaminant.It is shed from ever present wild mouse populations, may not be detectable even with established rodent control, and can persist in the environment and in raw materials long after being shed.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationown data
    § Virus detection methods

    The safety of biologic products should not rely on testing alone, including orthogonal methods, but should be assured by multiple controls including prevention, detection, and viral clearance throughout the process.

    “These data imply that the safety of biologic products should not rely on testing alone (including orthogonal methods) but be assured by multiple controls (including prevention, detection, and viral clearance) throughout the process.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § Virus risk-mitigation strategies.

    For living cell-based therapies, viral clearance would be required to remove or inactivate viruses in the cell culture supernatant and to separate or destroy infected cells from uninfected cells.

    “In the case of living cell-based therapies, viral clearance would be required to remove or inactivate viruses in the cell culture supernatant as well as separating or destroying infected cells, which harbor virus, from any cells not infected with virus.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given
    § Virus contamination risks.

    The three main risks for viral contamination in cell culture for therapeutic production are cell sources, materials utilized in cell culture, and exposure of the cell culture process stream to the operator/environment.

    “The three main risks for viral contamination in cell culture for therapeutic production are cell sources, materials utilized in cell culture, and exposure of the cell culture process stream to the operator/environment.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Virus contamination risks.

    Due to the scale of their manufacture, ATMPs may rely much more on open cell culture transfers than recombinant proteins and vaccines, resulting in an increased possibility of virus contamination from open operations for these types of products.

    “However, due to the scale of their manufacture, ATMPs may rely much more on open cell culture transfers than recombinant proteins and vaccines.The result is an increased possibility of virus contamination from open operations for these types of products.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § Contamination prevention.

    Some animal- or human-derived materials may be sensitive to heat, radiation, or UV exposure, which may ultimately affect cell growth and performance.

    “Despite the effectiveness of treating raw materials, we note that some animal-or human-derived materials may be sensitive to heat, radiation, or UV exposure, which may ultimately affect cell growth and performance.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Contamination prevention.

    New detection technologies, such as high-throughput sequencing (HTS), have detected adventitious viral contaminants in the presence of virus product.

    “Additionally, new detection technologies, such as high-throughput sequencing (HTS), have detected adventitious viral contaminants in the presence of virus product 54 and are being explored for use in the industry 55,56 .”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [54] Wirth, T., Parker, N. & Ylä-Herttuala, S. History of gene therapy. Gene 525, 162–169 (2013). source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given
    § Virus contamination risks.

    Media are filter sterilized before use, typically with 0.1 μm rated sterilizing-grade filters through which most viruses will pass.

    “These are filter sterilized before use, typically with 0.1µm rated sterilizing-grade filters through which most viruses will pass.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Virus contamination risks.

    Tests to assure that autologous cell therapy-derived cells are free of adventitious virus generally cannot be completed prior to initiating cell therapy manufacturing, and the process generally proceeds at risk.

    “Tests to assure that the derived cells are free of adventitious virus generally cannot be completed prior to initiating cell therapy manufacturing and the process generally proceeds at risk.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § Conclusions

    For a previously unknown emerging virus, such as SARS-CoV-2, the capacity of the virus to infect production cell lines or be detected in existing assays is not initially known.

    “This is never more true than when faced with a previously unknown emerging virus, such as SARS-CoV-2, where the capacity of the virus to infect production cell lines or be detected in existing assays is not initially known.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Virus contamination risks.

    Animal-derived and human-derived components, such as serum and growth factors, carry a higher risk of virus contamination than other media components and are commonly added to media for ATMP production.

    “Animalderived (Table 2) and human-derived components (e.g., serum, growth factors), which carry a higher risk of virus contamination than other media components 47 , are commonly added to media for ATMP production 48 .”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [47] Mundt, W. et al. Virus filtration of cell culture media. Patent WO2013192009A1 (2003).

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [48] Mullard, A. Second anticancer CAR T therapy receives FDA approval. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 16, 818 (2017). source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Contamination prevention.

    Developing media formulations that do not require animal- or human-sourced raw materials can be a challenge for some ATMPs, especially those where nutrient requirements are not well understood, such as primary cell cultures, or which may have variable starting cells, such as autologous cell therapies.

    “This can be a challenge for some ATMPs, especially those where nutrient requirements are not well understood, such as primary cell cultures, or which may have variable starting cells, such as autologous cell therapies.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given
    § Virus contamination risks.

    Cell culture processes employed for the manufacture of biopharmaceutical products and ATMP products all utilize a variety of basal media formulations comprised of a mixture of more than 50 essential nutrients and other chemicals.

    “Cell culture processes employed for the manufacture of biopharmaceutical products and ATMP products all utilize a variety of basal media formulations comprised of a mixture of more than 50 essential nutrients (e.g., amino acids, vitamins, trace elements) and other chemicals.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Contamination prevention.

    High-throughput sequencing is seeing widespread interest from the vaccine and recombinant protein industry.

    “High-throughput sequencing provides a greater breadth of detection than PCR and is seeing widespread interest from the vaccine and recombinant protein industry 56 .”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [56] US Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for Industry: Characterization and Qualification of Cell Substrates and Other Biological Materials Used in the Production of Viral Vaccines for Infectious Disease Indications (US Food and Drug Administration, 2010).

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Contamination prevention.

    Viral-vectored gene therapy products utilize plasmids or recombinant viruses to initiate production.

    “Viral-vectored gene therapy products utilize plasmids or recombinant viruses to initiate production 51 .”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [51] Brindley, D. A. et al. Peak serum: implications of serum supply for cell therapy manufacturing. Regen. Med. 7, 7–13 (2012). source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Virus risk-mitigation strategies.

    Virus-risk mitigation for biopharmaceutical manufacturing uses three complementary approaches: preventing virus entry by selecting low-risk starting and raw materials and utilizing manufacturing controls; testing of in-process materials to ensure they are free of virus and enable lot rejection; and clearance of virus by inactivation and/or removal from the product.

    “As noted above, virus-risk mitigation for biopharmaceutical manufacturing uses three complementary approaches: 1) preventing virus entry by selecting low risk starting and raw materials and utilizing manufacturing controls, 2) testing of in process materials to ensure they are free of virus and enable lot rejection and 3) clearance of virus (inactivation and/or removal) from the product 9,14 .”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [9] International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use. Q5A(R1). Viral Safety Evaluation Of Biotechnology Products Derived From Cell Lines Of Human Or Animal Origin (International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use, 1999).

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [14] Kozlowski, S. & Swann, P. Current and future issues in the manufacturing and development of monoclonal antibodies. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 58, 707–722 (2006). source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Implications for cell and gene therapy manufacturers

    A delay in administering treatment, such as due to contamination of a production process, could negatively impact patients, possibly leading to their death.

    “A delay in administering treatment, such as due to contamination of a production process, could negatively impact patients, possibly leading to their death.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Virus risk-mitigation strategies.

    These differential clearance strategies, coupled with an understanding of the most likely viral risks, potential sources of virus, and the host cell line susceptibility to those viruses, could enable the development of a virus removal strategy.

    “These differential clearance strategies, coupled with an understanding of the most likely viral risks, potential sources of virus, and the host cell line susceptibility to those viruses, could enable the development of a virus removal strategy.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Contamination prevention.

    ATMP manufacturing is often more challenging for environmental control as there are more open manipulations that provide opportunity to introduce an environmental contaminant and many small lots may be manufactured at once.

    “This is often more challenging in ATMP manufacturing as there are more open manipulations that provide opportunity to introduce an environmental contaminant and many small lots may be manufactured at once.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Contamination prevention.

    New detection technologies, such as HTS, are being explored for use in the industry.

    “Additionally, new detection technologies, such as high-throughput sequencing (HTS), have detected adventitious viral contaminants in the presence of virus product 54 and are being explored for use in the industry 55,56 .”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [55] US Food and Drug Administration. Draft Guidance for Industry: Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Control (CMC) Information for Human Gene Therapy Investigational New Drug Applications (INDs) (US Food and Drug Administration, 2018).

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [56] US Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for Industry: Characterization and Qualification of Cell Substrates and Other Biological Materials Used in the Production of Viral Vaccines for Infectious Disease Indications (US Food and Drug Administration, 2010).

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationnone given
    § Contamination prevention.

    Virus contamination during ATMP cell-culture manufacturing processes by environmental sources can be avoided by the use of functionally closed systems, which often employ single-use, disposable equipment.

    “Virus contamination during ATMP cell-culture manufacturing processes by environmental sources must be strictly avoided and can be done so by the use of functionally closed systems, which often employ single-use, disposable equipment.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Contamination prevention.

    Approaches to develop successful virus tests have been developed and used.

    “While challenging to test for adventitious viruses in the presence of recombinant viral stocks, approaches to develop successful virus tests have been developed and used 53 .”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [53] Ye, G. J. et al. Herpes simplex virus clearance during purification of a recombinant adeno-associated virus serotype 1 vector. Hum. Gene Ther. Clin. Dev. 25, 212–217 (2014). source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Contamination prevention.

    Current HTS sample preparation approaches and bioinformatic pipelines are not as rapid as PCR and can take 7-10 days.

    “However, current HTS sample preparation approaches and bioinformatic pipelines are not as rapid as PCR and can take 7-10 days 55 .”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [55] US Food and Drug Administration. Draft Guidance for Industry: Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Control (CMC) Information for Human Gene Therapy Investigational New Drug Applications (INDs) (US Food and Drug Administration, 2018).

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § Virus risk-mitigation strategies.

    Many of the virus clearance unit operations used during purification of therapeutic proteins are not suitable for use with, or have not been widely applied to, ATMPs.

    “Many of the virus clearance unit operations used during purification of therapeutic proteins described earlier are not suitable for use with, or have not been widely applied to, ATMPs.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
59 of 59
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The safety record of recombinant DNA-produced therapeutic proteins is due to the current three-pillar safety approach rather than to other factors.

    “Because of this approach, these products have been safe for over 35 years, and to our knowledge, there has been no transmission of a contaminating virus to a patient from a therapeutic protein produced using recombinant DNA technology.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The CAACB member-reported contamination events are comprehensive and representative of virus contaminations in mammalian cell culture biomanufacturing.

    “The CAACB has collected a comprehensive set of data on virus contamination experience, as well as controls in place to prevent contaminations, from 20 major biopharmaceutical manufacturers.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Source attributions based on indirect evidence correctly identify the raw material as the source of contamination.

    “In the other eight contamination events, virus testing of raw materials was negative and the source of the contamination was only identified using indirect evidence.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The absence of reported cross-contamination in the CAACB data indicates that cross-contamination controls are effective.

    “Data collected as a part of the CAACB study indicate that current manufacturing controls used to prevent the spread of a potential contaminant within manufacturing facilities are effective as no cross-contamination of other concurrent manufacturing operations was reported.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The 18 virus contamination events reported to the CAACB are all the contamination events that occurred among the responding companies.

    “Nine out of the 20 responding companies (i.e., almost half of the involved industry respondents), reported having one or more adventitious virus contaminations in mammalian cell culture operations since 1985, totaling 18 virus contamination events reported to the CAACB.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    There is currently no technology capable of meeting the challenge of viral clearance for living cell-based therapies.

    “To our knowledge, there is currently no technology capable of meeting this challenge.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    None of the virus inactivation methods used for traditional biopharmaceutical manufacturing is compatible with the survival of living cells.

    “Additionally, none of the virus inactivation methods used for traditional biopharmaceutical manufacturing is compatible with the survival of living cells.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Plasmids are generated in prokaryotic cells.

    “Plasmids are generated in prokaryotic cells and should be free of viruses that would replicate in mammalian cell cultures.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The use of animal- and human-derived raw materials during ATMP production increases virus contamination risk.

    “The use of animal-and human-derived raw materials during ATMP production increases virus contamination risk.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Gamma-irradiation of human serum is not yet standard practice.

    “It is not yet standard practice for human serum but should be strongly considered to reduce the risk of these raw materials if safer alternatives are not suitable.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Testing for adventitious virus contamination at relevant points in the cell-culture manufacturing process has been conducted in recombinant protein manufacture for many years.

    “Testing for adventitious virus contamination at relevant points in the cell-culture manufacturing process, usually just before production cell culture harvest, has been conducted in recombinant protein manufacture for many years.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The current gold standard for lot release testing in recombinant protein products is the in vitro virus (IVV) assay.

    “The current gold standard for lot release testing in recombinant protein products is the in vitro virus, or IVV, assay, a cell-based assay that has a large breadth of detection for potential viral contaminants.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Nucleic acid-based assays, such as PCR, are faster than the IVV assay, taking less than a day.

    “Nucleic acid-based assays, such as PCR, are faster than the In Vitro Virus assay, taking less than a day.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    PCR assays require prior knowledge of potential contaminants and only detect viral nucleic acids.

    “Yet PCR assays require prior knowledge of potential contaminants and only detect viral nucleic acids.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Viral infection of cell culture is a real risk with severe consequences.

    “Despite these controls, viral infection of cell culture is a real risk with severe consequences.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Rapid PCR tests for forward processing decisions enhance containment and prevent the spread of a contaminating virus to other parts of the manufacturing facility.

    “Some approaches, such as the implementation of rapid PCR tests for forward processing decisions, have been shown to enhance containment and prevent the spread of a contaminating virus to other parts of the manufacturing facility.”
16 of 16

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Conclusion reverses the virus counts by host cell type

    Minor

    The conclusion assigns five contaminating viruses to CHO cells and four to human or primate cells, reversing the counts stated earlier in the paper.

  • IVV lot-release assay count differs between text and Table 3

    Minor

    The text says the IVV assay was used for lot release in all 15 cGMP events, but Table 3 lists it as a QC lot-release assay in 14 events.

2 of 2

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 64 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Nims, R.W. et al. Detection of Cache Valley virus in biologics manufactured in CHO cells. Biopharm. Int. 21, 89–95 (2008).
  2. Anonymous. The 2019 16th Annual Report and Survey of Biopharmaceutical Manufacturing Capacity and Production (BioPlan Associates, Rockville, MD, USA, 2019).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barone, P. W., Wiebe, M. E., Leung, J. C., Hussein, I. T. M., Keumurian, F. J., Bouressa, J., Brussel, A., Chen, D., Chong, M., Dehghani, H., Gerentes, L., Gilbert, J., Gold, D., Kiss, R., Kreil, T. R., Labatut, R., Li, Y., Müllberg, J., Mallet, L., Menzel, C., Moody, M., Monpoeho, S., Murphy, M., Plavsic, M., Roth, N. J., Roush, D., Ruffing, M., Schicho, R., Snyder, R., Stark, D., Zhang, C., Wolfrum, J., Sinskey, A. J., & Springs, S. L.
Affiliations
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
  • Pfizer (United States) (US)
  • Sanofi (France) (FR)
  • Eli Lilly (United States) (US)
  • CSL (Australia) (AU)
  • Amgen (United States) (US)
  • Biogen (United States) (US)
  • BioMarin (United States) (US)
  • Genentech (US)
  • Baxter (Austria) (AT)
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb (United States) (US)
  • University of Geneva (CH)
  • Merrimack Pharmaceuticals (United States) (US)
  • Regeneron (United States) (US)
  • CSL (Switzerland) (CH)
  • Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) (US)
  • Boehringer Ingelheim (Germany) (DE)
  • Novartis (Switzerland) (CH)
  • Shire (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Springs, Stacy L.
Venue
Nature Biotechnology
Published
2020-04-27
Volume
38
Issue
5
Pages
563-572
ISSN
  • 0733-222X (ISSN-L)
  • 1087-0156
  • 1546-1696
OpenAlex
W3018259108
Cited by
212
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 14
FWCI
2.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Biotechnology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Funders
  • Amgen
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • Pfizer
  • AstraZeneca
  • Sanofi
  • Biogen
  • Histogenics
  • CSL Behring
  • Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
  • Genentech
  • EMD Serono
  • Sanofi Genzyme
  • Sanofi Pasteur
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Viral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein purification and stability
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Virus-based gene therapy research
Keywords
viral contamination, bioproduction, recombinant therapeutic proteins, cell culture, adventitious agents, cell lines, cell and gene therapy, vaccine production, plasma-derived products, pollution sources, corrective actions
MeSH terms
Biological Products, Data Collection, Drug Contamination, Drug Industry, Humans, Massachusetts, Viruses, Cell Culture Techniques, Information Dissemination

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-28.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-28.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review