Cited by 87Tissue Engineering and Regenerative MedicineElectrochemical sensors and biosensorsPancreatic function and diabetes

Enhancement of implantable glucose sensor function in vivo using gene transfer-induced neovascularization

Klueh, Ulrike, Dorsky, David I., Kreutzer, Don L.·2005·Biomaterials

Abstract

The in vivo failure of implantable glucose sensors is thought to be largely the result of inflammation and fibrosis-induced vessel regression at sites of sensor implantation. To determine whether increased vessel density at sites of sensor implantation would enhance sensor function, cells genetically engineered to over-express the angiogenic factor (AF) vascular endothelial cell growth factor (VEGF) were incorporated into an ex ova chicken embryo chorioallantoic membrane (CAM)-glucose sensor model. The VEGF-producing cells were delivered to sites of glucose sensor implantation on the CAM using a tissue-interactive fibrin bio-hydrogel as a cell support and activation matrix. This VEGF-cell-fibrin system induced significant neovascularization surrounding the implanted sensor, and significantly enhanced the glucose sensor function in vivo. This model system, for the first time, provides the "proof of principle" that increasing vessel density at the sites of implantation can enhance glucose sensor function in vivo, and demonstrates the potential of gene transfer and tissue interactive fibrin bio-hydrogels in the development of successful implants.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.04.017

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Significant inflammation and development of foreign body giant cells were reported for VEGF-producing biosensors.

    “significant inflammation and the development of FBGCs were reported for VEGF-“producing” biosensors.204”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 40 · Cited by 87

Authors
Klueh, U., Dorsky, D. I., & Kreutzer, D. L.
Affiliations
University of Connecticut (US)
Corresponding author
Kreutzer, Don L.
Venue
Biomaterials
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-04
Volume
26
Issue
10
Pages
1155-1163
ISSN
0142-9612 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2013455392
Cited by
87
References
40
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 3
FWCI
5.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biomaterials (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electrochemical sensors and biosensors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
Keywords
implantable glucose sensor, neovascularization, vascular endothelial growth factor, gene transfer, chorioallantoic membrane model, angiogenesis, fibrosis, vessel regression
MeSH terms
Animals, Blood Glucose, Chick Embryo, Chickens, Drug Implants, Foreign-Body Reaction, Biosensing Techniques, Drug Delivery Systems, Gene Transfer Techniques, Neovascularization, Physiologic, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A, Chorioallantoic Membrane

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review