Cited by 158Tissue Engineering and Regenerative MedicineHydrogels: synthesis, properties, applicationsNitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects

Reduced foreign body response at nitric oxide-releasing subcutaneous implants

Open access
Hetrick, Evan M., Prichard, Heather L., Klitzman, Bruce, Schoenfisch, Mark H.·2007·Biomaterials

Abstract

The tissue response to nitric oxide (NO)-releasing subcutaneous implants is presented. Model implants were created by coating silicone elastomer with diazeniumdiolate-modified xerogel polymers capable of releasing NO. The host tissue response to such implants was evaluated at 1, 3, and 6 weeks and compared to that of uncoated silicone elastomer blanks and xerogel-coated controls incapable of releasing NO. Delivery of NO (approximately 1.35 micromol/cm2 of implant surface area) reduced foreign body collagen capsule ("scar tissue") thickness by >50% compared to uncoated silicone elastomer after 3 weeks. The chronic inflammatory response at the tissue/implant interface was also reduced by >30% at NO-releasing implants after 3 and 6 weeks. Additionally, CD-31 immunohistochemical staining revealed approximately 77% more blood vessels in proximity to NO-releasing implants after 1 week compared to controls. These findings suggest that conferring NO release to subcutaneous implants may promote effective device integration into healthy vascularized tissue, diminish foreign body capsule formation, and improve the performance of indwelling medical devices that require constant mass transport of analytes (e.g., implantable sensors).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.06.036

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Hetrick et al. found that nitric oxide reduced collagen encapsulation by about 20-25% versus controls at 3 and 6 weeks, mitigated inflammation, and appeared to enhance vascular density at 1 and 3 weeks.

    “In addition to reduced collagen encapsulation (~20–25% vs. controls) observed at 3 and 6 weeks, the NO mitigated inflammation (determined by reduced inflammatory cells near the implant) and appeared to enhance vascular density at 1 and 3 weeks.238”
  • The anti-inflammatory effect correlated with nitric oxide release duration, indicating that benefits may only persist while the interface is releasing nitric oxide, in contrast to Hetrick et al. where long-term reduction in inflammation was observed after cessation of release.

    “The anti-inflammation correlated with the NO-release duration indicating that the observed benefits may only persist as long as the interface is releasing NO, in contrast to observations by Hetrick et al. where long-term reduction in inflammation were observed after cessation of NO release.103,238”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 46 · Cited by 158

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [29]Pett MA. Nonparametric statistics for health care research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications; 1997. [Google Scholar]

Authors
Hetrick, E. M., Prichard, H. L., Klitzman, B., & Schoenfisch, M. H.
Affiliations
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • Duke University (US)
Corresponding author
Schoenfisch, Mark H.
Venue
Biomaterials
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-11
Volume
28
Issue
31
Pages
4571-4580
ISSN
0142-9612 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2054343135
Cited by
158
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 9
FWCI
6.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biomaterials (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
  • UNC Libraries
Funders
  • Eastman Chemical Company
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (EB 000708, R01EB000708)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Medicine › Hydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects
Keywords
nitric oxide release, subcutaneous implants, foreign body reaction, diazeniumdiolates, chronic inflammation, CD31, angiogenesis, implantable sensors, implant-tissue interface
MeSH terms
Animals, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Drug Carriers, Drug Implants, Foreign Bodies, Male, Nitric Oxide, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Implants, Experimental, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review