The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Finite element study of scaffold architecture design and culture conditions for tissue engineering
Open accessAbstract
Tissue engineering scaffolds provide temporary mechanical support for tissue regeneration and transfer global mechanical load to mechanical stimuli to cells through its architecture. In this study the interactions between scaffold pore morphology, mechanical stimuli developed at the cell microscopic level, and culture conditions applied at the macroscopic scale are studied on two regular scaffold structures. Gyroid and hexagonal scaffolds of 55% and 70% porosity were modeled in a finite element analysis and were submitted to an inlet fluid flow or compressive strain. A mechanoregulation theory based on scaffold shear strain and fluid shear stress was applied for determining the influence of each structures on the mechanical stimuli on initial conditions. Results indicate that the distribution of shear stress induced by fluid perfusion is very dependent on pore distribution within the scaffold. Gyroid architectures provide a better accessibility of the fluid than hexagonal structures. Based on the mechanoregulation theory, the differentiation process in these structures was more sensitive to inlet fluid flow than axial strain of the scaffold. This study provides a computational approach to determine the mechanical stimuli at the cellular level when cells are cultured in a bioreactor and to relate mechanical stimuli with cell differentiation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
3D bioprinting of tissues and organs for regenerative medicine
Vijayavenkataraman, S., Yan, W.-C., Lu, W. F., Wang, C.-H., & Fuh, J. Y. H. (2018) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2018.07.004 · Cited by 630
Biomaterials for articular cartilage tissue engineering: Learning from biology
Armiento, A. R., Stoddart, M. J., Alini, M., & Eglin, D. (2018) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2017.11.021 · Cited by 579
Design and properties of 3D scaffolds for bone tissue engineering
Gómez, S., Vlad, M. D., López, J., & Fernández, E. (2016) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2016.06.032 · Cited by 477
Current trends in the design of scaffolds for computer-aided tissue engineering
Giannitelli, S. M., Accoto, D., Trombetta, M., & Rainer, A. (2014) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2013.10.024 · Cited by 451
Design, Materials, and Mechanobiology of Biodegradable Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering
Velasco, M. A., Narváez-Tovar, C. A., & Garzón-Alvarado, D. A. (2015) · BioMed Research International · doi:10.1155/2015/729076 · Cited by 395
Metadata
- Authors
- Olivares, A. L., Marsal, È., Planell, J. A., & Lacroix, D.
- Venue
- Biomaterials
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-10
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 30
- Pages
- 6142-6149
- ISSN
- 0142-9612 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2035966549
- Cited by
- 339
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Finite element study of scaffold architecture design and culture conditions for tissue engineering. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.07.041
- The paper
- Olivares, A. L., Marsal, È., Planell, J. A., & Lacroix, D. (2009). Finite element study of scaffold architecture design and culture conditions for tissue engineering. Biomaterials. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.07.041
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.