The DOI matches its Crossref record; 265 of the 265 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
3D bioprinting of tissues and organs for regenerative medicine
Abstract
&NA; 3D bioprinting is a pioneering technology that enables fabrication of biomimetic, multiscale, multi‐cellular tissues with highly complex tissue microenvironment, intricate cytoarchitecture, structure‐function hierarchy, and tissue‐specific compositional and mechanical heterogeneity. Given the huge demand for organ transplantation, coupled with limited organ donors, bioprinting is a potential technology that could solve this crisis of organ shortage by fabrication of fully‐functional whole organs. Though organ bioprinting is a far‐fetched goal, there has been a considerable and commendable progress in the field of bioprinting that could be used as transplantable tissues in regenerative medicine. This paper presents a first‐time review of 3D bioprinting in regenerative medicine, where the current status and contemporary issues of 3D bioprinting pertaining to the eleven organ systems of the human body including skeletal, muscular, nervous, lymphatic, endocrine, reproductive, integumentary, respiratory, digestive, urinary, and circulatory systems were critically reviewed. The implications of 3D bioprinting in drug discovery, development, and delivery systems are also briefly discussed, in terms of in vitro drug testing models, and personalized medicine. While there is a substantial progress in the field of bioprinting in the recent past, there is still a long way to go to fully realize the translational potential of this technology. Computational studies for study of tissue growth or tissue fusion post‐printing, improving the scalability of this technology to fabricate human‐scale tissues, development of hybrid systems with integration of different bioprinting modalities, formulation of new bioinks with tuneable mechanical and rheological properties, mechanobiological studies on cell‐bioink interaction, 4D bioprinting with smart (stimuli‐responsive) hydrogels, and addressing the ethical, social, and regulatory issues concerning bioprinting are potential futuristic focus areas that would aid in successful clinical translation of this technology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
RETRACTED: Clinical transplantation of a tissue-engineered airway
Macchiarini, P., Jungebluth, P., Go, T., Asnaghi, M. A., Rees, L. E., Cogan, T. A., Dodson, A., Martorell, J., Bellini, S., Parnigotto, P. P., et al. (2008) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(08)61598-6 · Cited by 1,433
Retracted3D bioprinting of tissues and organs
Murphy, S. V., & Atala, A. (2014) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2958 · Cited by 7,034
Feldkamp, L. A., Davis, L. C., & Kress, J. W. (1984) · Journal of the Optical Society of America A · doi:10.1364/josaa.1.000612 · Cited by 6,319
Iliff, J. J., Wang, M., Liao, Y., Plogg, B. A., Peng, W., Gundersen, G. A., Benveniste, H., Vates, G. E., Deane, R., Goldman, S. A., et al. (2012) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.3003748 · Cited by 5,824
Scaffolds in tissue engineering bone and cartilage
Hutmacher, D. W. (2000) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/s0142-9612(00)00121-6 · Cited by 4,994
Rayleigh, L. (1878) · Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society · doi:10.1112/plms/s1-10.1.4 · Cited by 3,064
A 3D bioprinting system to produce human-scale tissue constructs with structural integrity
Kang, H.-W., Lee, S. J., Ko, I. K., Kengla, C., Yoo, J. J., & Atala, A. (2016) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.3413 · Cited by 2,622
A review on stereolithography and its applications in biomedical engineering
Melchels, F. P. W., Feijen, J., & Grijpma, D. W. (2010) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.04.050 · Cited by 2,457
A new algorithm for Monte Carlo simulation of Ising spin systems
Bortz, A. B., Kalos, M. H., & Lebowitz, J. L. (1975) · Journal of Computational Physics · doi:10.1016/0021-9991(75)90060-1 · Cited by 2,403
Idris, M. H., Jafari, H., Harandi, S. E., Mirshahi, M., & Koleyni, S. J. (2012) · Advanced materials research · Cited by 2,357
Cited by
Nazir, A., Gokcekaya, O., Md Masum Billah, K., Ertugrul, O., Jiang, J., Sun, J., & Hussain, S. (2023) · Materials & Design · doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2023.111661 · Cited by 773
Innovative Treatment Strategies to Accelerate Wound Healing: Trajectory and Recent Advancements
Kolimi, P., Narala, S., Nyavanandi, D., Youssef, A. A. A., & Dudhipala, N. (2022) · Cells · doi:10.3390/cells11152439 · Cited by 585
Nicolas, J., Magli, S., Rabbachin, L., Sampaolesi, S., Nicotra, F., & Russo, L. (2020) · Biomacromolecules · doi:10.1021/acs.biomac.0c00045 · Cited by 509
Metaverse for Healthcare: A Survey on Potential Applications, Challenges and Future Directions
Chengoden, R., Victor, N., Huynh-The, T., Yenduri, G., Jhaveri, R. H., Alazab, M., Bhattacharya, S., Hegde, P., Maddikunta, P. K. R., & Gadekallu, T. R. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3241628 · Cited by 508
Kim, B. S., Das, S., Jang, J., & Cho, D.-W. (2020) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00808 · Cited by 465
Metadata
- Authors
- Vijayavenkataraman, S., Yan, W.-C., Lu, W. F., Wang, C.-H., & Fuh, J. Y. H.
- Venue
- Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-07
- Volume
- 132
- Pages
- 296-332
- ISSN
- 0169-409X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2811526028
- Cited by
- 630
- References
- 265
- FWCI
- 4.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs for regenerative medicine. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.addr.2018.07.004
- The paper
- Vijayavenkataraman, S., Yan, W.-C., Lu, W. F., Wang, C.-H., & Fuh, J. Y. H. (2018). 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs for regenerative medicine. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2018.07.004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.