Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 630

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 265 of the 265 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

3D bioprinting of tissues and organs for regenerative medicine

Vijayavenkataraman, Sanjairaj, Yan, Wei-Cheng, Lu, Wen Feng, Wang, Chi-Hwa, Fuh, Jerry Ying Hsi·2018·Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews

Abstract

&NA; 3D bioprinting is a pioneering technology that enables fabrication of biomimetic, multiscale, multi‐cellular tissues with highly complex tissue microenvironment, intricate cytoarchitecture, structure‐function hierarchy, and tissue‐specific compositional and mechanical heterogeneity. Given the huge demand for organ transplantation, coupled with limited organ donors, bioprinting is a potential technology that could solve this crisis of organ shortage by fabrication of fully‐functional whole organs. Though organ bioprinting is a far‐fetched goal, there has been a considerable and commendable progress in the field of bioprinting that could be used as transplantable tissues in regenerative medicine. This paper presents a first‐time review of 3D bioprinting in regenerative medicine, where the current status and contemporary issues of 3D bioprinting pertaining to the eleven organ systems of the human body including skeletal, muscular, nervous, lymphatic, endocrine, reproductive, integumentary, respiratory, digestive, urinary, and circulatory systems were critically reviewed. The implications of 3D bioprinting in drug discovery, development, and delivery systems are also briefly discussed, in terms of in vitro drug testing models, and personalized medicine. While there is a substantial progress in the field of bioprinting in the recent past, there is still a long way to go to fully realize the translational potential of this technology. Computational studies for study of tissue growth or tissue fusion post‐printing, improving the scalability of this technology to fabricate human‐scale tissues, development of hybrid systems with integration of different bioprinting modalities, formulation of new bioinks with tuneable mechanical and rheological properties, mechanobiological studies on cell‐bioink interaction, 4D bioprinting with smart (stimuli‐responsive) hydrogels, and addressing the ethical, social, and regulatory issues concerning bioprinting are potential futuristic focus areas that would aid in successful clinical translation of this technology.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.addr.2018.07.004

Cites

265 of 265 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Show all 265 references

Cited by

See all 630

Metadata

Authors
Vijayavenkataraman, S., Yan, W.-C., Lu, W. F., Wang, C.-H., & Fuh, J. Y. H.
Venue
Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-07
Volume
132
Pages
296-332
ISSN
0169-409X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2811526028
Cited by
630
References
265
FWCI
4.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs for regenerative medicine. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.addr.2018.07.004
The paper
Vijayavenkataraman, S., Yan, W.-C., Lu, W. F., Wang, C.-H., & Fuh, J. Y. H. (2018). 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs for regenerative medicine. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2018.07.004

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.