Critical role of tissue mast cells in controlling long-term glucose sensor function in vivo
Open accessAbstract
Little is known about the specific cells, mediators and mechanisms involved in the loss of glucose sensor function (GSF) in vivo. Since mast cells (MC) are known to be key effector cells in inflammation and wound healing, we hypothesized that MC and their products are major contributors to the skin inflammation and wound healing that controls GSF at sites of sensor implantation. To test this hypothesis we utilized a murine model of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in vivo in both normal C57BL/6 mice (mast cell sufficient), as well as mast cell deficient B6.Cg-Kit(W-sh)/HNihrJaeBsmJ (Sash) mice over a 28 day CGM period. As expected, both strains of mice displayed excellent CGM for the first 7 days post sensor implantation (PSI). CGM in the mast cell sufficient C57BL/6 mice was erratic over the remaining 21 days PSI. CGM in the mast cell deficient Sash mice displayed excellent sensor function for the entire 28 day of CGM. Histopathologic evaluation of implantation sites demonstrated that tissue reactions in Sash mice were dramatically less compared to the reactions in normal C57BL/6 mice. Additionally, mast cells were also seen to be consistently associated with the margins of sensor tissue reactions in normal C57BL/6 mice. Finally, direct injection of bone marrow derived mast cells at sites of sensor implantation induced an acute and dramatic loss of sensor function in both C57BL/6 and Sash mice. These results demonstrate the key role of mast cells in controlling glucose sensor function in vivo.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Histology confirmed that mast cell-deficient mice had less fibrosis and inflammation at the implantation site.
“Histology samples from both experimental groups confirmed that the mast cell-deficient mice exhibited reduced fibrosis and inflammation at the implantation site.”
From Biocompatible Materials for Continuous Glucose Monitoring Devices (2013) · cites this paper as [106]
Injecting 10^4-10^5 mast cells at the implant site caused sensor performance to recover within about 15 min, followed by a decrease in glucose response after 1-2 days.
“While glucose sensor performance recovered soon after injection (~15 min), the sensor response to glucose decreased after 1–2 days”
From Biocompatible Materials for Continuous Glucose Monitoring Devices (2013) · cites this paper as [106]
These results indicate a link between mast cell action and erratic glucose sensor performance.
“further indicating a link between mast cell action and erratic glucose sensor performance.106”
From Biocompatible Materials for Continuous Glucose Monitoring Devices (2013) · cites this paper as [106]
In mast cell-sufficient mice, glucose sensor performance was erratic, with temporary response loss during the first 3 weeks of a 28-day implantation.
“glucose sensor performance in mast cell-sufficient mice was erratic with temporary response loss occurring within the first 3 weeks.”
From Biocompatible Materials for Continuous Glucose Monitoring Devices (2013) · cites this paper as [106]
In mast cell-deficient mice, sensor performance was markedly better and remained reliable throughout the 28-day period.
“Sensor performance in mast cell-deficient mice was markedly better with reliable sensor function throughout the 28-day period.106”
From Biocompatible Materials for Continuous Glucose Monitoring Devices (2013) · cites this paper as [106]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 21 · Cited by 48
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [20]Krishnaswamy G Chi DS Methods in Molecular Biology: Mast Cells Methods and Protocols 2006 Totowa Humana Press Inc
- Authors
- Klueh, U., Kaur, M., Qiao, Y., & Kreutzer, D. L.
- Affiliations
- University of Connecticut (US)
- Corresponding author
- Klueh, Ulrike
- Venue
- Biomaterials
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-06
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 4540-4551
- ISSN
- 0142-9612 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC2850116
- OpenAlex
- W2051494465
- Cited by
- 48
- References
- 21
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 6.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Licence
- Locations
- Biomaterials (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- American Diabetes Association
- Abbott Diabetes Care
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (DK081171, R01DK074817, R01DK081171, DK074817)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Mast cells and histamine
- Keywords
- mast cells, continuous glucose monitoring, skin inflammation, wound healing, mast cell-deficient mice, bone marrow-derived mast cells, implant biocompatibility
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Bone Marrow Cells, Female, Glucose, Humans, Mast Cells, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Inbred Strains, Biosensing Techniques, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review