The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The healing of bony defects by cell-free collagen-based scaffolds compared to stem cell-seeded tissue engineered constructs
Abstract
One of the key challenges in tissue engineering is to understand the host response to scaffolds and engineered constructs. We present a study in which two collagen-based scaffolds developed for bone repair: a collagen-glycosaminoglycan (CG) and biomimetic collagen-calcium phosphate (CCP) scaffold, are evaluated in rat cranial defects, both cell-free and when cultured with MSCs prior to implantation. The results demonstrate that both cell-free scaffolds showed excellent healing relative to the empty defect controls and somewhat surprisingly, to the tissue engineered (MSC-seeded) constructs. Immunological analysis of the healing response showed higher M1 macrophage activity in the cell-seeded scaffolds. However, when the M2 macrophage response was analysed, both groups (MSC-seeded and non-seeded scaffolds) showed significant activity of these cells which are associated with an immunomodulatory and tissue remodelling response. Interestingly, the location of this response was confined to the construct periphery, where a capsule had formed, in the MSC-seeded groups as opposed to areas of new bone formation in the non-seeded groups. This suggests that matrix deposited by MSCs during in vitro culture may adversely affect healing by acting as a barrier to macrophage-led remodelling when implanted in vivo. This study thus improves our understanding of host response in bone tissue engineering.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Research from our group suggests that marked differences in M1 and M2 presence is observed 4 and 8 weeks after implantation of cell free and MSC filled porous collagen-based scaffolds (Fig. 6a,b,e,f) [82]”
From Biomaterial based modulation of macrophage polarization: a review and suggested design principles (2015) · cites this paper as [82]
Citations
Cites
Multilineage potential of adult human mesenchymal stem cells
Pittenger, M. F., Mackay, A. M., Beck, S. C., Jaiswal, R. K., Douglas, R., Mosca, J. D., Moorman, M. A., Simonetti, D. W., Craig, S., & Marshak, D. R. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.284.5411.143 · Cited by 21,052
Biodegradable and bioactive porous polymer/inorganic composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering
Rezwan, K., Chen, Q. Z., Blaker, J. J., & Boccaccini, A. R. (2006) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.039 · Cited by 3,840
Krampera, M., Glennie, S. J., Dyson, J., Scott, D. M., Laylor, R. M., Simpson, E., & Dazzi, F. (2003) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2002-07-2104 · Cited by 1,597
Calcium Phosphate-Based Osteoinductive Materials
LeGeros, R. Z. (2008) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr800427g · Cited by 1,347
The effect of pore size on cell adhesion in collagen-GAG scaffolds
O’Brien, F. J., Harley, B. A. C., Yannas, I. V., & Gibson, L. J. (2004) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.02.052 · Cited by 1,336
Self-citationDesign of an artificial skin. I. Basic design principles
Yannas, I. V., & Burke, J. F. (1980) · Journal of Biomedical Materials Research · doi:10.1002/jbm.820140108 · Cited by 1,045
Bone remodeling during fracture repair: The cellular picture
Schindeler, A., McDonald, M. M., Bokko, P. B., & Little, D. G. (2008) · Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.1016/j.semcdb.2008.07.004 · Cited by 986
Vascularization Strategies for Tissue Engineering
Lovett, M. L., Lee, K., Edwards, A., & Kaplan, D. L. (2009) · Tissue Engineering Part B Reviews · doi:10.1089/ten.teb.2009.0085 · Cited by 923
Brown, B. N., Valentin, J. E., Stewart-Akers, A. M., McCabe, G. P., & Badylak, S. F. (2009) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.11.040 · Cited by 896
Design of an artificial skin. I. Basic design principles
Yannas, I. V., & Burke, J. F. (1980) · Journal of Biomedical Materials Research · doi:10.1002/jbm.820140314 · Cited by 889
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Jahangir, 2008, Bone-graft substitutes in orthopaedic surgery, AAOS Now, 2
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Biomaterials & scaffolds for tissue engineering
O'Brien, F. J. (2011) · Materials Today · doi:10.1016/s1369-7021(11)70058-x · Cited by 3,437
Self-citation3D bioactive composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering
Turnbull, G. S., Clarke, J., Picard, F., Riches, P. E., Jia, L., Han, F., Li, B., & Shu, W. (2017) · Bioactive Materials · doi:10.1016/j.bioactmat.2017.10.001 · Cited by 1,388
The Collagen Suprafamily: From Biosynthesis to Advanced Biomaterial Development
Sorushanova, A., Delgado, L. M., Wu, Z., Shologu, N., Kshirsagar, A., Raghunath, R., Mullen, A. M., Bayon, Y., Pandit, A. S., Raghunath, M., et al. (2018) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201801651 · Cited by 1,204
Biomaterial based modulation of macrophage polarization: a review and suggested design principles
Sridharan, R., Cameron, A. R., Kelly, D. J., Kearney, C. J., & O’Brien, F. J. (2015) · Materials Today · doi:10.1016/j.mattod.2015.01.019 · Cited by 826
Self-citationFernández, M., Abbah, S. A., McNamara, L. M., Zeugolis, D. I., Pandit, A. S., & Biggs, M. J. P. (2014) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2014.09.005 · Cited by 524
Metadata
- Authors
- Lyons, F. G., Al-Munajjed, A. A., Kieran, S. M., Toner, M. E., Murphy, C. M., Duffy, G. P., & O’Brien, F. J.
- Affiliations
- Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (IE)
- Trinity College Dublin (IE)
- Corresponding author
- O’Brien, Fergal J.
- Venue
- Biomaterials
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-12
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 35
- Pages
- 9232-9243
- ISSN
- 0142-9612 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2060078219
- Cited by
- 222
- References
- 54
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 8.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Biomaterials (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Lenus, The Irish Health Repository (Dr Steevens Hospital Library) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Enterprise Ireland
- Science Foundation Ireland (04/Yl1/B531, 06/RFP/ENM012)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Collagen: Extraction and Characterization
- Keywords
- bone defect repair, collagen scaffolds, cell-free scaffolds, mesenchymal stem cells, cranial defects, macrophage polarization, M1 macrophages, M2 macrophages, collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffolds, bone tissue engineering, capsule formation, bone remodeling
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Biomechanical Phenomena, Bone Regeneration, Calcium Phosphates, Collagen, Glycosaminoglycans, Macrophages, Male, Wound Healing, Rats, Wistar, Tissue Engineering, Rats, Tissue Scaffolds, X-Ray Microtomography, Mesenchymal Stem Cells
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
