A biofunctionalization scheme for neural interfaces using polydopamine polymer
Abstract
Chemical surface modification of neuron-surface interfaces is essential for the development of biologically active and functional neural interfaces. Different types of surface modification schemes are required to derivatize either electrode or insulator surfaces, which limits the surface chemistry based neural interface design. Herein, we report a novel and powerful approach for modifying neuron-surface interfaces using mussel-inspired polymer ('polydopamine film(polyDA)') for generating effective chemical platforms on both electrode and insulator surfaces simultaneously. We applied polyDAs to common neural interface surfaces (gold, glass, platinum, indium tin oxide, liquid crystal polymer) and subsequently functionalized them by covalently linking biomolecules. The surfaces coated with polyDAs exhibited uniform and reproducible surface properties and they all became neuron-adhesive after linking with poly-D-lysine. In addition, polydopamine-coated microelectrode arrays were readily functional such that spontaneous and evoked neural activities could be recorded from cultured neuronal networks. We have successfully showed that a novel polyDA can be effectively used for the neural interface design.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
PDA-assisted surface modification is expanding its applications to not only bone biosubstitutes but also cardiovascular devices, biosensors, neuron pseudosubstitutes, and sustainable drug delivery.
“the PDA-assisted surface modification is expanding its applications to not only bone biosubstitutes but also cardiovascular devices, biosensors, neuron pseudosubstitutes, and sustainable drug delivery [18, 99–101].”
From Polydopamine-Assisted Surface Modification for Bone Biosubstitutes (2016) · cites this paper as [101]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Polydopamine-Assisted Surface Modification for Bone Biosubstitutes
Huang, S., Liang, N., Hu, Y., Zhou, X., & Abidi, N. (2016) · BioMed Research International · doi:10.1155/2016/2389895 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
“[100] K.”
Background
- Authors
- Kang, K., Choi, I. S., & Nam, Y.
- Affiliations
- Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KR)
- Corresponding author
- Choi, Insung S.
- Nam, Yoonkey
- Venue
- Biomaterials
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-09
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 27
- Pages
- 6374-6380
- ISSN
- 0142-9612 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1992661036
- Cited by
- 158
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 17
- FWCI
- 7.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Biomaterials (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Industrial Source Technology Development Program (10033657-2010-12)
- Ministry of Knowledge Economy(MKE), and the Basic Science Research Program (2010-0001953)
- National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
- Ministry of Education, Korea
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Surfaces, Coatings and Films › Polymer Surface Interaction Studies
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Conducting polymers and applications
- Keywords
- polydopamine, neural interfaces, biofunctionalization, surface functionalization, poly-D-lysine, neuron adhesion, microelectrode arrays, liquid crystalline polymers, gold electrode, platinum electrode, indium tin oxide, neural recording
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Cells, Cultured, Dopamine, Electric Stimulation, Gold, Hippocampus, Indoles, Materials Testing, Microelectrodes, Microscopy, Fluorescence, Neurons, Polylysine, Polymers, Surface Properties, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Bivalvia, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review