Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 176

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Self-assembled peptide nanofibers raising durable antibody responses against a malaria epitope

Open access
Rudra, Jai S., Mishra, Satish, Chong, Anita S., Mitchell, Robert A., Nardin, Elizabeth H., Nussenzweig, Victor, Collier, Joel H.·2012·Biomaterials

Abstract

Biomaterials that modulate innate and adaptive immune responses are receiving increasing interest as adjuvants for eliciting protective immunity against a variety of diseases. Previous results have indicated that self-assembling β-sheet peptides, when fused with short peptide epitopes, can act as effective adjuvants and elicit robust and long-lived antibody responses. Here we investigated the mechanism of immunogenicity and the quality of antibody responses raised by a peptide epitope from P. falciparum circumsporozoite (CS) protein, (NANP)3,conjugated to the self-assembling peptide domain Q11. The mechanism of adjuvant action was investigated in knockout mice with impaired MyD88, NALP3, TLR-2, or TLR-5 function, and the quality of antibodies raised against (NANP)3-Q11 was assessed using a transgenic sporozoite neutralizing (TSN) assay for malaria infection. (NANP)3-Q11 self-assembled into nanofibers, and antibody responses lasted up to 40 weeks in C57BL/6 mice. The antibody responses were T cell- and MyD88-dependent. Sera from mice primed with either irradiated sporozoites or a synthetic peptide, (T1BT*)4-P3C, and boosted with (NANP)3-Q11 showed significant increases in antibody titers and significant inhibition of sporozoite infection in TSN assays. In addition, two different epitopes could be self-assembled together without compromising the strength or duration of the antibody responses raised against either of them, making these materials promising platforms for self-adjuvanting multi-antigenic immunotherapies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.05.041

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 176

Metadata

Authors
Rudra, J. S., Mishra, S., Chong, A. S., Mitchell, R. A., Nardin, E. H., Nussenzweig, V., & Collier, J. H.
Venue
Biomaterials
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-09
Volume
33
Issue
27
Pages
6476-6484
ISSN
0142-9612 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1972483952
Cited by
176
References
3
FWCI
12.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Self-assembled peptide nanofibers raising durable antibody responses against a malaria epitope. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.05.041
The paper
Rudra, J. S., Mishra, S., Chong, A. S., Mitchell, R. A., Nardin, E. H., Nussenzweig, V., & Collier, J. H. (2012). Self-assembled peptide nanofibers raising durable antibody responses against a malaria epitope. Biomaterials. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.05.041

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.