The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Size-dependent radiosensitization of PEG-coated gold nanoparticles for cancer radiation therapy
Open accessAbstract
Gold nanoparticles have been conceived as a radiosensitizer in cancer radiation therapy, but one of the important questions for primary drug screening is what size of gold nanoparticles can optimally enhance radiation effects. Herein, we perform in vitro and in vivo radiosensitization studies of 4.8, 12.1, 27.3, and 46.6 nm PEG-coated gold nanoparticles. In vitro results show that all sizes of the PEG-coated gold nanoparticles can cause a significant decrease in cancer cell survival after gamma radiation. 12.1 and 27.3 nm PEG-coated gold nanoparticles have dispersive distributions in the cells and stronger sensitization effects than 4.8 and 46.6 nm particles by both cell apoptosis and necrosis. Further, in vivo results also show all sizes of the PEG-coated gold nanoparticles can significantly decrease tumor volume and weight after 5 Gy radiations, and 12.1 and 27.3 nm PEG-coated gold nanoparticles have greater sensitization effects than 4.8 and 46.6 nm particles, which can lead to almost complete disappearance of the tumor. In vivo biodistribution confirms that 12.1 and 27.3 nm PEG-coated gold nanoparticles are accumulated in the tumor with high concentrations. The pathology, immune response, and blood biochemistry indicate that the PEG-coated gold nanoparticles have not caused spleen and kidney damages, but give rise to liver damage and gold accumulation. It can be concluded that 12.1 and 27.3 nm PEG-coated gold nanoparticles show high radiosensitivity, and these results have an important indication for possible radiotherapy and drug delivery.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Beiträge zur Optik trüber Medien, speziell kolloidaler Metallösungen
Mie, G. (1908) · Annalen der Physik · doi:10.1002/andp.19083300302 · Cited by 11,537
Cited by
Gold Nanoparticles in Diagnostics and Therapeutics for Human Cancer
Singh, P., Pandit, S., Mokkapati, V. R. S. S., Garg, A., Ravikumar, V., & Mijakovic, I. (2018) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms19071979 · Cited by 1,038
Photosensitizers with Aggregation‐Induced Emission: Materials and Biomedical Applications
Hu, F., Xu, S., & Liu, B. (2018) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201801350 · Cited by 859
Gold nanoparticles for applications in cancer radiotherapy: Mechanisms and recent advancements
Her, S., Jaffray, D. A., & Allen, C. (2017) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2015.12.012 · Cited by 865
Shahbazi, M.-A., Faghfouri, L., Ferreira, M. P. A., Figueiredo, P., Maleki, H., Sefat, F., Hirvonen, J., & Santos, H. A. (2020) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c9cs00283a · Cited by 523
Biodegradable Polymer Nanogels for Drug/Nucleic Acid Delivery
Li, Y., Maciel, D., Rodrigues, J., Shi, X., & Tomás, H. (2015) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr500131f · Cited by 478
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, X.-D., Wu, D., Shen, X., Chen, J., Sun, Y.-M., Liu, P.-X., & Liang, X.-J.
- Venue
- Biomaterials
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-09
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 27
- Pages
- 6408-6419
- ISSN
- 0142-9612 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2130547709
- Cited by
- 511
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 22.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Size-dependent radiosensitization of PEG-coated gold nanoparticles for cancer radiation therapy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.05.047
- The paper
- Zhang, X.-D., Wu, D., Shen, X., Chen, J., Sun, Y.-M., Liu, P.-X., & Liang, X.-J. (2012). Size-dependent radiosensitization of PEG-coated gold nanoparticles for cancer radiation therapy. Biomaterials. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.05.047
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.