The DOI matches its Crossref record; 111 of the 111 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Could 3D models of cancer enhance drug screening?
Open accessAbstract
Cancer is a multifaceted pathology, where cellular and acellular players interact to drive cancer progression and, in the worst-case, metastasis. The current methods to investigate the heterogeneous nature of cancer are inadequate, since they rely on 2D cell cultures and animal models. The cell line-based drug efficacy and toxicity assays are not able to predict the tumor response to anti-cancer agents and it is already widely discussed how molecular pathway are not recapitulated in vitro so called flat biology. On the other side, animal models often fail to detect the side-effects of drugs, mimic the metastatic progression or the interaction between cancer and immune system, due to biologic difference in human and animals. Moreover, ethical and regulatory issues limit animal experimentation. Every year pharma/biotech companies lose resources in drug discovery and testing processes that are successful only in 5% of the cases. There is an urgent need to validate accurate and predictive platforms in order to enhance drug-testing process taking into account the physiopathology of the tumor microenvironment. Three dimensional in vitro tumor models could enhance drug manufactures in developing effective drugs for cancer diseases. The 3D in vitro cancer models can improve the predictability of toxicity and drug sensitivity in cancer. Despite the demonstrated advantages of 3D in vitro disease systems when compared to 2D culture and animal models, they still do not reach the standardization required for preclinical trials. This review highlights in vitro models that may be used as preclinical models, accelerating the drug development process towards more precise and personalized standard of care for cancer patients. We describe the state-of-the art of 3D in vitro culture systems, with a focus on how these different approaches could be coupled in order to achieve a compromise between standardization and reliability in recapitulating tumor microenvironment and drug response.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Innovation in the pharmaceutical industry: New estimates of R&D costs
DiMasi, J. A., Grabowski, H. G., & Hansen, R. W. (2016) · Journal of Health Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jhealeco.2016.01.012 · Cited by 3,359
Bhatia, S. N., & Ingber, D. E. (2014) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2989 · Cited by 3,305
Modeling Development and Disease with Organoids
Clevers, H. (2016) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2016.05.082 · Cited by 3,196
Organogenesis in a dish: Modeling development and disease using organoid technologies
Lancaster, M. A., & Knoblich, J. A. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1247125 · Cited by 2,931
The NCI60 human tumour cell line anticancer drug screen
Shoemaker, R. H. (2006) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc1951 · Cited by 2,620
A living biobank of breast cancer organoids captures disease heterogeneity
Sachs, N., de Ligt, J., Kopper, O., Gogola, E., Bounova, G., Weeber, F., Balgobind, A. V., Wind, K., Gracanin, A., Begthel, H., et al. (2018) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2017.11.010 · Cited by 1,973
Spheroid-based drug screen: Considerations and practical approach
Friedrich, J., Seidel, C., Ebner, R., & Kunz-Schughart, L. A. (2009) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2008.226 · Cited by 1,742
How does the extracellular matrix direct gene expression?
Bissell, M. J., Hall, H. G., & Parry, G. (1982) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-5193(82)90388-5 · Cited by 1,522
Chen, F., Tillberg, P. W., & Boyden, E. S. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1260088 · Cited by 1,501
2D and 3D Cell Cultures - a Comparison of Different Types of Cancer Cell Cultures
Kapałczyńska, M., Kolenda, T., Przybyła, W., Zajączkowska, M., Teresiak, A., Filas, V., Ibbs, M., Bliźniak, R., Łuczewski, Ł., & Lamperska, K. (2016) · Archives of Medical Science · doi:10.5114/aoms.2016.63743 · Cited by 1,499
Cited by
Lv, Y., Wang, H., Li, G., & Zhao, B. (2021) · Bioactive Materials · doi:10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.02.004 · Cited by 67
3D fluid-dynamic ovarian cancer model resembling systemic drug administration for efficacy assay
Marrella, A. (2020) · ALTEX · doi:10.14573/altex.2003131 · Cited by 36
Xu, Y., Qi, J., Zhou, W., Liu, X., Zhang, L., Yao, X., & Wu, H. (2022) · Bio-Design and Manufacturing · doi:10.1007/s42242-022-00204-4 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Brancato, V., Oliveira, J. M., Correlo, V. M., Reis, R. L., & Kundu, S. C.
- Venue
- Biomaterials
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-02
- Volume
- 232
- Pages
- 119744
- ISSN
- 0142-9612 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2996862224
- Cited by
- 281
- References
- 111
- FWCI
- 9.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Could 3D models of cancer enhance drug screening? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119744
- The paper
- Brancato, V., Oliveira, J. M., Correlo, V. M., Reis, R. L., & Kundu, S. C. (2020). Could 3D models of cancer enhance drug screening? Biomaterials. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119744
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.