The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Technological learning and cost reductions in wood fuel supply chains in Sweden
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The Nordic countries of Sweden and Finland are pioneers of the systematic large-scale use of forest residues for energy production.
“The Nordic countries of Sweden and Finland are pioneers of the systematic large-scale use of forest residues for energy production (Hakkila andParikka 2002, Junginger et al. 2005), limbs, tops, and small noncommercial trees (i.e., what is called slash in North America and logging residues in Europe) being the main assortment used.”
From Costs, CO2 Emissions, and Energy Balances of Applying Nordic Slash Recovery Methods in British Columbia (2011) · cites this paper as Junginger et al. 2005
The Swedish costs are the result of several decades of efficiency improvement and accompanying cost-cutting; this implies that a slash recovery system in British Columbia is likely, initially, to have substantially higher costs.
“Moreover, the Swedish costs are the result of several decades of efficiency improvement and accompanying cost-cutting (Junginger et al. 2005); this implies that a slash recovery system in British Columbia is likely, initially, to have substantially higher costs.”
From Costs, CO2 Emissions, and Energy Balances of Applying Nordic Slash Recovery Methods in British Columbia (2011) · cites this paper as Junginger et al. 2005
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 28
- Roos, 1999, Critical factors to bioenergy implementation, Biomass and Bioenergy, 17, 113, 10.1016/S0961-9534(99)00028-8 · DOI
- Hillring, 1999, The Swedish woodfuel market, Renewable energy, 16, 1031, 10.1016/S0960-1481(98)00365-6 · DOI
- Junginger M, Faaij A, Turkenburg WC. Cost reduction opportunities for offshore wind farms. Chapter in: Learning in renewable energy technology development, Doctoral thesis, Martin Junginger, Utrecht University, The Netherlands, 13 May 2005. p. 206.
- Goldemberg, 1996, The evolution of ethanol costs in Brazil, Energy Policy, 24, 1127, 10.1016/S0301-4215(96)00086-9 · DOI
- Junginger M, Visser Ed, Faaij A, Claeson Colpier U. Technological learning and cost reductions of biomass CHP combustion plants. The case of Sweden. In: Second World Conference on Biomass for Energy, Industry and Climate Protection, Rome, Italy, 2004.
- Argote, 1990, Learning curves in manufacturing, Science, 247, 920, 10.1126/science.247.4945.920 · DOI
- Wright, 1936, Factors affecting the cost of airplanes, Journal of Aeronautical Sciences, 3, 122, 10.2514/8.155 · DOI
- McDonald, 2001, Learning rates for energy technologies, Energy Policy, 29, 255, 10.1016/S0301-4215(00)00122-1 · DOI
- Kamp L. Learning in wind turbine development. A comparison between the Netherlands and Denmark, Doctoral thesis, Utrecht University, 2002. p. 244.
- Junginger, 2004, Global experience curves for wind farms, Energy Policy, 33, 133, 10.1016/S0301-4215(03)00205-2 · DOI
- Neij L. Dynamics of energy systems, Methods of analysing technology change, Doctoral thesis, Lund University, 1999. p. 48 (and 5 papers).
- Hillring, 1998, National strategies for stimulating the use of bioenergy: policy instruments in Sweden, Biomass and Bioenergy, 14, 425, 10.1016/S0961-9534(97)10036-8 · DOI
- Björklund A, Niklasson T, Wahlen M. Biomass in Sweden. Biomass-fired CHP plant in Eskilstuna, Refocus, September 2001. p. 14–8. · DOI
- Nilsson, 2004, Seeing the wood for the trees: 25 years of renewable energy policy in Sweden, Energy for Sustainable Development, 8, 67, 10.1016/S0973-0826(08)60392-0 · DOI
- Johansson B. Biomass in Sweden—historic development and future potential under new policy regimes. In: Second World Conference on Biomass for Energy, Industry and Climate Protection, Rome, Italy, 2004.
- Björheden, 2001, Learning curves in tree section hauling in central Sweden, Journal of Forest Engineering, 2001, 9
- Andersson, 2002, Chapter 3: production of forest energy, 49
- Hakkila, 2004, Developing technology for large-scale production of forest chips, Tekes, 99
- Brunberg, 1991, Tillvaratagande av skogsbränsle-träddelar och trädrester, Forskningsstiftelsen Skogsarbeten, 54
- SVEBIO. Studieresa A—Södra Skogsenergi. In: SVEBIO 81-Skogsbränsle, Dokumentation från Svenska Bioenergiföreningsn studiebesök och symposium i Växjö 1981.11.17–18, Växjö, Sweden, SVEBIO.
- Gustavsson, 1997, Energy efficiency and competitiveness of biomass-based energy systems, Energy, 22, 959, 10.1016/S0360-5442(97)00028-5 · DOI
- Hillring, 1997, Price trends in the Swedish wood-fuel market, Biomass and Bioenergy, 12, 41, 10.1016/S0961-9534(96)00066-9 · DOI
- Ericsson, 2004, International biofuel trade—a study of the Swedish import, Biomass & Bioenergy, 26, 205, 10.1016/S0961-9534(03)00122-3 · DOI
- Junginger M, Faaij A, Björheden R. Technological learning and cost reductions in woodfuel supply chains. In: Van Swaaij WPM, Fjällstrom T, Helm P, Grassi A, editors. Second World Conference on Biomass for Energy, Industry and Climate Protection. Rome, Italy, 2004. p. 546–49.
- Johansson J, Liss J-E, Gullberg T, Björheden R. Transport and handling of forest energy bundles—advantages and problems. Biomass & Bioenergy 2004, in press.
- Ranta T. Logging residues from regeneration fellings for biofuel production—a GIS-based availability and supply cost analysis. PhD thesis, Lappeeranta University, 2002. p. 182.
- Statistics Finland. Energy statistics 2001, 2003 (Chapter 12).
- Alexandersson H, Carlsson T, Rådström L. Transportalternativ för energiråvaror. Forskningsstifelsen Skogsarbeten Redogörelse 1984;5:40.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lindroos, O., Nilsson, B., & Sowlati, T. (2011) · Western Journal of Applied Forestry · doi:10.1093/wjaf/26.1.30 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Junginger, M., Faaij, A., Björheden, R., & Turkenburg, W. C.
- Affiliations
- Utrecht University (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Junginger, M.
- Venue
- Biomass and Bioenergy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-12
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 399-418
- ISSN
- 0961-9534 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1971653765
- Cited by
- 97
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 6.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Biomass and Bioenergy (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Forest Biomass Utilization and Management
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Wood Residue Utilization and Solid Biofuels
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development
- Keywords
- cost reduction, experience curve, hands-on learning, technological learning, chipping, production costs, Sweden
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
