The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The profitability of transporting uncomminuted raw materials in Finland
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Moreover, followup studies of chipped slash have indicated that it allows substantially higher truck payloads (approximately 17 ODt; Ranta and Rinne 2006) than the hog fuel payloads assumed in this study.”
From Costs, CO2 Emissions, and Energy Balances of Applying Nordic Slash Recovery Methods in British Columbia (2011) · cites this paper as Ranta and Rinne 2006
In the citing paper
“Given these general relationships, the finding that the slash system is competitive only for very small landings and very short transport distances is consistent with both expectations and previous studies (e.g., Ranta andRinne 2006, Engblom 2007).”
From Costs, CO2 Emissions, and Energy Balances of Applying Nordic Slash Recovery Methods in British Columbia (2011) · cites this paper as Ranta and Rinne 2006
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Angus, 1995, The transportation of fuel wood from forest to facility, Biomass and Bioenergy, 9, 191, 10.1016/0961-9534(95)00091-7 · DOI
- Andersson G. Technology of fuel chip production in Sweden. In: Alakangas E., editor. Nordic treasure hunt. Extracting energy from forest residues. VTT symposium 208, Jyväskylä, Finland, 2000. p. 113–125.
- Ranta T. Logging residues from regeneration fellings for biofuel production—a GIS-based availability and supply cost analysis. Doctoral thesis, Acta Universitatis Lappeenrantaensis 128, Lappeenranta University of Technology, Finland, 2002. 180pp.
- Sundberg U, Silversides CR, editors. Operational efficiency in forestry, vol. 1, Analysis. Forestry Sciences 1988; 219. · DOI
- Väkevä J. Uusi polttoaineen kulutusmalli puuautoille. Summary: new fuel consumption model for timber trucks. Metsäteho 2003(2): 7–8.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lindroos, O., Nilsson, B., & Sowlati, T. (2011) · Western Journal of Applied Forestry · doi:10.1093/wjaf/26.1.30 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Ranta, T., & Rinne, S.
- Affiliations
- Lappeenranta-Lahti University of Technology (FI)
- VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland (FI)
- Corresponding author
- Ranta, T.
- Venue
- Biomass and Bioenergy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-03
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 231-237
- ISSN
- 0961-9534 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2026370721
- Cited by
- 104
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 4.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Biomass and Bioenergy (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Forest Biomass Utilization and Management
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Wood Residue Utilization and Solid Biofuels
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Transport and Logistics Innovations
- Keywords
- energy wood, biomass transportation, transport profitability, load size, bulk density, GPS tracking, truck-trailer combinations, terminal time, stumps, forest chips, moisture content, Finland
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review