Cited by 25Bioenergy crop production and managementAgricultural Productivity and Crop ImprovementWeed Control and Herbicide Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Long-term yield effects of establishment method and weed control in willow for short rotation coppice (SRC)

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.10.001

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. Hauk, 2014, Economic evaluation of short rotation coppice systems for energy from biomass - a review, Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 29, 435, 10.1016/j.rser.2013.08.103 · DOI
  2. Rosenqvist, 2005, Economics of willow growing in Northern Ireland, Biomass Bioenergy, 28, 7, 10.1016/j.biombioe.2004.06.001 · DOI
  3. Kasmioui, 2013, Financial analysis of the cultivation of short rotation woody crops for bioenergy in Belgium: barriers and opportunities, Bioenergy Res, 6, 336, 10.1007/s12155-012-9262-7 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Kasmioui, 2012, Financial analysis of the cultivation of poplar and willow for bioenergy, Biomass & Bioenergy, 43, 52, 10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.04.006 · DOI
  5. Buchholz, 2011, Improving the profitability of willow crops – identifying opportunities with a crop budget model, Bioenergy Res, 4, 85, 10.1007/s12155-010-9103-5 · DOI
  6. Faasch, 2012, The economics of short rotation coppice in Germany, Biomass & Bioenergy, 45, 27, 10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.04.012 · DOI
  7. Larsen, 2014, Willow yield is highly dependent on clone and site, Bioenergy Res, 10.1007/s12155-014-9463-3 · DOI
  8. Karp, 2011, Genetic improvement of willow for bioenergy and biofuels, J Integr Plant Biol, 53, 151, 10.1111/j.1744-7909.2010.01015.x · DOI · Paper page
  9. Dimitriou, 2011, Slow expansion and low yields of willow short rotation coppice in Sweden; implications for future strategies, Biomass & Bioenergy, 35, 4613, 10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.09.006 · DOI
  10. Mola-Yudego, 2008, Yield models for commercial willow biomass plantations in Sweden, Biomass Bioenergy, 32, 829, 10.1016/j.biombioe.2008.01.002 · DOI
  11. Sowinski, 1988, Effect of herbicides and of additional interrow hoeing on weediness, growth and yields of willow. Part I. Effect of weediness, growth and yield of willow in the first cultivation year. Roczniki Nauk Rolniczych Seria A, Prod Rosl, 107, 187
  12. Clay, 1997, Effect of ground-cover vegetation on the growth of poplar and willow short-rotation coppice, Aspects Appl Biol, 49, 53
  13. Albertsson, 2014, Site-related set-back by weeds on the establishment of 12 biomass willow clones, Weed Res, 10.1111/wre.12086 · DOI
  14. Sage, 1999, Weed competition in willow coppice crops: the cause and extent of yield losses, Weed Res Oxf, 39, 399, 10.1046/j.1365-3180.1999.00154.x · DOI
  15. Skrzypczak, 2007, Effectiveness of chemical weed control in first year of wicker (Salix ssp.) growing, Prog Plant Prot/Postępy w Ochronie Roślin, 47, 392
  16. Bergkvist, 1997, Effects of the herbicides propaquizafop and primisulfuron-methyl on Salix plants and weeds in energy plantations, Biomass Bioenergy, 12, 25, 10.1016/S0961-9534(96)00056-6 · DOI
  17. Lowthe-Thomas, 2010, Reducing the establishment costs of short rotation willow coppice (SRC) - a trial of a novel layflat planting system at an upland site in mid-Wales, Biomass Bioenergy, 34, 677, 10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.01.011 · DOI
  18. McCracken, 2010, Effect of planting vertical/horizontal willow (Salix spp.) cuttings on establishment and yield, Biomass Bioenergy, 34, 1764, 10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.07.008 · DOI
  19. Mortensen, 1998, Nitrate leaching during establishment of willow (Salix viminalis) on two soil types and at two fertilization levels, Biomass Bioenergy, 15, 457, 10.1016/S0961-9534(98)00056-7 · DOI
  20. Makkink, 1957, Testing the penman formula by means of lysimeters, Int J Water Eng, 11, 277
  21. Sowinski, 1988, Effect of herbicides and of additional interrow hoeing on weediness, growth and yields of willow. Part II. Residual effect on yield and quality of stems in the second cultivation year. Roczniki Nauk Rolniczych Seria A, Prod Rosl, 107, 205
  22. Cox, 1999, Agronomics and economics of different weed management systems in corn and soybean, Agron J, 91, 585, 10.2134/agronj1999.914585x · DOI
  23. Vigl, 2014, Size matters? the diverging influence of cutting length on growth and allometry of two Salicaceae clones, Biomass & Bioenergy, 60, 130, 10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.11.020 · DOI
  24. Burgess, 1990, The importance of initial cutting size for improving the growth performance of Salix alba l, Scand J For Res, 5, 215, 10.1080/02827589009382607 · DOI
  25. Rossi, 1999, Length of cuttings in establishment and production of short-rotation plantations of Salix 'Aquatica', New For, 18, 161, 10.1023/A:1006525716499 · DOI
  26. Verwijst, 2012, Effects of clone and cutting traits on shoot emergence and early growth of willow, Biomass & Bioenergy, 37, 257, 10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.12.004 · DOI
  27. Shield, 2008, The effect of the size of the cuttings planted on the subsequent performance of three contrasting willow cultivars for short rotation coppice, Aspects Appl Biol, 90, 225
  28. Cao, 2011, Effects of planting orientation and density of willows on biomass production and nutrient leaching, New For, 41, 361, 10.1007/s11056-010-9228-6 · DOI
  29. Cao, 2012, Effects of planting orientation and density on the soil solution chemistry and growth of willow cuttings, Biomass Bioenergy, 46, 165, 10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.09.006 · DOI
  30. Edelfeldt, 2013, Effects of mechanical planting on establishment and early growth of willow, Biomass Bioenergy, 55, 234, 10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.02.018 · DOI
  31. McCracken, 2001, Yield responses of willow (Salix) grown in mixtures in short rotation coppice (SRC), Biomass Bioenergy, 21, 311, 10.1016/S0961-9534(01)00046-0 · DOI
  32. Bullard, 2002, Yield improvements through modification of planting density and harvest frequency in short rotation coppice Salix spp. - 1. Yield response in two morphologically diverse varieties, Biomass Bioenergy, 22, 15, 10.1016/S0961-9534(01)00054-X · DOI
  33. Wilkinson, 2007, Yield of willow cultivars at different planting densities in a commercial short rotation coppice in the north of England, Biomass Bioenergy, 31, 469, 10.1016/j.biombioe.2007.01.020 · DOI
  34. Willebrand, 1993, Willow coppice systems in short rotation forestry: effects of plant spacing rotation length and clonal composition on biomass production, Biomass Bioenergy, 4, 323, 10.1016/0961-9534(93)90048-9 · DOI
  35. Verwijst, 1991, Shoot mortality and dynamics of live and dead biomass in a stand of Salix viminalis, Biomass Bioenergy, 1, 35, 10.1016/0961-9534(91)90049-I · DOI
  36. Dimitriou, 2011, Sewage sludge and wastewater fertilisation of short rotation coppice (SRC) for increased bioenergy production - biological and economic potential, Biomass Bioenergy, 35, 835, 10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.11.010 · DOI
  37. Kopp, 2001, Willow biomass production during ten successive annual harvests, Biomass & Bioenergy, 20, 1, 10.1016/S0961-9534(00)00063-5 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Larsen, S. U., Jørgensen, U., Kjeldsen, J. B., & Lærke, P. E.
Affiliations
Aarhus University (DK)
Corresponding author
Lærke, Poul Erik
Venue
Biomass and Bioenergy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-12
Volume
71
Pages
266-274
ISSN
0961-9534 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2119135868
Cited by
25
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2
FWCI
6.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Biomass and Bioenergy (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Bioenergy crop production and management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Agricultural Productivity and Crop Improvement
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Weed Control and Herbicide Applications
Keywords
willow, short rotation coppice, establishment methods, dry matter yield, weed control, mechanical weed control, chemical weed control, cuttings, billets, rods, energy crops

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review