Cited by 60Bioenergy crop production and managementSoil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsForest ecology and management

Characterization of fine root system and potential contribution to soil organic carbon of six perennial bioenergy crops

Chimento, Carlo, Amaducci, Stefano·2015·Biomass and Bioenergy

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.09.008

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chimento, C., & Amaducci, S.
Affiliations
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT)
Corresponding author
Amaducci, Stefano
Venue
Biomass and Bioenergy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-12
Volume
83
Pages
116-122
ISSN
0961-9534 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2143996798
Cited by
60
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 3
FWCI
10.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Biomass and Bioenergy (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • European Union
  • Italian Ministry of Agriculture
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Bioenergy crop production and management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Forest ecology and management
Keywords
fine roots, root length density, fine root biomass, soil organic carbon sequestration, perennial energy crops, poplar, Robinia pseudoacacia, willow, Arundo donax, Miscanthus, switchgrass, root diameter, root depth distribution, beta model, deep soil carbon

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review