Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 566

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 162 of the 162 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Biomass-to-hydrogen: A review of main routes production, processes evaluation and techno-economical assessment

Lepage, Thibaut, Kammoun, Maroua, Schmetz, Quentin, Richel, Aurore·2021·Biomass and Bioenergy

Abstract

Abstract Hydrogen is viewed as a sustainable strategic alternative to fossil fuels, especially in the field of road and air transport. Currently, hydrogen production is derived from fossil fuels or is manufactured by splitting water. A novel option, H2-generation from lignocellulosic biomass, based on renewable resources is currently in a pilot-scale demonstration or at a commercial stage. The present study reviews the thermochemical, biological, and electrochemical approaches used for biomass-to-hydrogen. The advantages, limitations, and major improvements of each process are presented. A techno-economic assessment is also established based on the production cost, technology readiness level, and industrial scalability. The objective is to allow industrial producers to visualise the degree of technological maturity of each option, clarify the necessary development efforts before reaching the commercial stage, determine the most relevant and competitive routes, and assess the suitability of biomass as a feedstock for renewable hydrogen production. In the reviewed results, the thermochemical process, particularly gasification, partial oxidation, and steam reforming, presented the best yield for H2 production. Steam gasification is the best compromise because it is suitable for wet and dry biomass, and it does not require an oxidising agent. As for biological conversion, dark fermentation is more worthwhile than photo-fermentation due to its lower energy consumption. Additionally, the electrochemical process is feasible for biomass. The findings of this study indicate that biomass-hydrogen-based processes are promising options that contribute to the H2 production capacity but require improvements to produce larger competitive volumes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biombioe.2020.105920

Cites

162 of 162 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 162 references

Cited by

See all 566

Metadata

Authors
Lepage, T., Kammoun, M., Schmetz, Q., & Richel, A.
Venue
Biomass and Bioenergy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-01
Volume
144
Pages
105920
ISSN
0961-9534 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3112070256
Cited by
566
References
162
FWCI
16.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biomass-to-hydrogen: A review of main routes production, processes evaluation and techno-economical assessment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.biombioe.2020.105920
The paper
Lepage, T., Kammoun, M., Schmetz, Q., & Richel, A. (2021). Biomass-to-hydrogen: A review of main routes production, processes evaluation and techno-economical assessment. Biomass and Bioenergy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2020.105920

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.