Cited by 238Bee Products Chemical AnalysisHealthcare and Venom ResearchWound Healing and Treatments

Potential role of propolis in wound healing: Biological properties and therapeutic activities

Oryan, Ahmad, Alemzadeh, Esmat, Moshiri, Ali·2018·Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy

Abstract

Propolis is a resinous mixture that honey bees collect from the tree buds, sap flows, or other botanical sources. The chemical composition of propolis varies and depends on the geographical area, time of collection, seasonality, illumination, altitude, and food availability during propolis exploitation. The goal of this review is to discuss important concepts including mechanisms of action and therapeutic activities of propolis. The PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for the literature published from January the 1st 2000 to October the 1st 2017. Sixteen animals and three clinical studies were included. A quantitative and qualitative review was performed on the clinical trials and the animal studies were comprehensively overviewed. In this study, the clinical trials have been combined and the results were provided as meta-analysis. Propolis is a non-toxic natural product; however some cases of allergy and contact dermatitis to this compound have been described mainly among beekeepers. An important factor in impaired wound healing is biofilm formation; propolis as an anti-microbial agent can reduce biofilm generation and result in accelerated healing processes. Most of the in vivo studies on various wound models suggested the beneficial roles of propolis on experimental wound healing and this has also been approved in the clinical trial studies. However, there is a lack of information concerning, dose, side effects and clinical effectiveness of…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biopha.2017.12.069

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Oryan, A., Alemzadeh, E., & Moshiri, A.
Affiliations
Shiraz University (IR)
Corresponding author
Oryan, Ahmad
Venue
Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-02
Volume
98
Pages
469-483
ISSN
0753-3322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2775860365
Cited by
238
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 7
FWCI
1.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Bee Products Chemical Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Healthcare and Venom Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Wound Healing and Treatments
Keywords
propolis, wound healing, biofilm formation, antimicrobial activity, contact dermatitis, clinical trials
MeSH terms
Animals, Anti-Infective Agents, Biological Products, Humans, Propolis, Wound Healing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review