Functional connectivity of dissociative responses in posttraumatic stress disorder: a functional magnetic resonance imaging investigation.
Abstract
Background The purpose of this study was to assess interregional brain activity covariations during traumatic script-driven imagery in subjects with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD).Methods Functional magnetic resonance imaging and functional connectivity analyses were used to assess interregional brain activity covariations during script-driven imagery in PTSD subjects with a dissociative response, PTSD subjects with a flashback response, and healthy control subjects.Results Significant between-group differences in functional connectivity were found. Comparing dissociated PTSD patients and control subjects' connectivity maps in the left ventrolateral thalamus (VLT) [-14, -16, 4] revealed that control subjects had higher covariations between activations in VLT and in the left superior frontal gyrus (Brodmann's area [BA] 10), right parahippocampal gyrus (BA 30), and right superior occipital gyrus (BA 19, 39), whereas greater covariation with VLT in dissociated PTSD subjects occurred in the right insula (BA 13, 34), left parietal lobe (BA 7), right middle frontal gyrus (BA 8), superior temporal gyrus (BA 38, 34), and right cuneus (BA 19). Comparing dissociated PTSD and flashback PTSD connectivity maps in the right cingulate gyrus [3, 16, 30] revealed that dissociated PTSD subjects had higher covariations between activations in this region and the left inferior frontal gyrus (BA 47).Conclusions Greater activation of neural networks involved in representing bodily states was seen in dissociated PTSD subjects than in non-PTSD control subjects. These findings might illuminate the mechanisms underlying distorted body perceptions often observed clinically during dissociative episodes.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Compared to patients with a flashback response, dissociative PTSD patients showed increased FC between right cingulate gyrus and left IFG.
“Compared to patients with a flashback response, dissociative patients showed increased FC between right cingulate gyrus and left IFG [56].”
From Dissociation and Alterations in Brain Function and Structure: Implications for Borderline Personality Disorder (2017) · cites this paper as [56]
Compared to controls, dissociative PTSD patients showed stronger FC of left VLT with right insula, middle frontal gyrus, superior temporal gyrus, cuneus, and left parietal lobe, but reduced VLT-FC with left superior frontal gyrus, right parahippocampal gyrus, and right superior occipital gyrus.
“compared to controls, dissociative patients showed stronger FC of the left ventrolateral thalamus (VLT) with right insula, middle frontal gyrus, superior temporal gyrus, cuneus, and with left parietal lobe, but reduced VLT-FC with the left superior frontal gyrus, right parahippocampal gyrus, and right superior occipital gyrus.”
From Dissociation and Alterations in Brain Function and Structure: Implications for Borderline Personality Disorder (2017) · cites this paper as [56]
For PTSD patients with dissociative responses to autobiographical trauma scripts, there is evidence for altered functional connectivity in areas implicated in sensory processing, consciousness, memory, and emotion regulation.
“For PTSD patients who showed dissociative responses to autobiographical trauma scripts (compared to patients with a flashback response and healthy controls), there is also evidence for altered functional connectivity (FC), i.e., coactivation in areas implicated in sensory processing, consciousness, memory, and emotion regulation [56]”
From Dissociation and Alterations in Brain Function and Structure: Implications for Borderline Personality Disorder (2017) · cites this paper as [56]
The dissociative PTSD pattern involves changes in connectivity and activation of the right anterior insula.
“changes in connectivity and activation of the right anterior insula,55,127,128”
From Fear and the Defense Cascade (2015) · cites this paper as [128]
Drawing on animal research, Porges postulates that hypoxic conditions, such as hyperventilation-induced cerebral hypoxia, increase the probability that sporadically active cardiac vagal neurons in the DMN will be activated, resulting in an episode of collapsed immobility.
“Drawing on animal research, Porges3 postulates that hypoxic conditions—of which hyperventilation-induced cerebral hypoxia is an example—increase the probability that the sporadically active102 cardiac vagal neurons in the DMN will be activated, resulting in an episode of collapsed immobility.”
From Fear and the Defense Cascade (2015) · cites this paper as [102]
Another study from the same research group found that although some dissociative PTSD patients had unchanged (or not increased) HR during trauma exposure, there was no clinical difference between these patients and those who exhibited decreased or increased HR.
“Another study from the same research group found that although some dissociative PTSD patients had unchanged (or not increased) HR during trauma exposure, there was no clinical difference between these patients and those who exhibited decreased or increased HR (Lanius et al., 2005).”
From Trauma-related dissociation and the autonomic nervous system: a systematic literature review of psychophysiological correlates of dissociative experiencing in PTSD patients (2022) · cites this paper as Lanius et al., 2005
The PTSD dissociative subtype demonstrates additional concomitant brainstem-mediated periaqueductal gray connectivity with structures linked to passive defensive responses and emotional detachment, including the temporoparietal junction, which has been previously associated with depersonalization.
“Specifically, the PTSD dissociative subtype demonstrated additional concomitant brainstem-mediated periaqueductal gray connectivity with structures linked to passive defensive responses and emotional detachment, including the temporoparietal junction, which has been previously associated with depersonalization (Lanius et al., 2005; Harricharan et al., 2016).”
From How Processing of Sensory Information From the Internal and External Worlds Shape the Perception and Engagement With the World in the Aftermath of Trauma: Implications for PTSD (2021) · cites this paper as Lanius et al., 2005
The posterior insula is thought to be important for receiving raw internal viscerosensory information related to interoceptive sensory processing, while the temporoparietal junction is thought to be involved in understanding one's self-location in external space.
“Whereas the posterior insula is thought to be important for receiving raw internal viscerosensory information related to interoceptive sensory processing, the temporoparietal junction is thought to be involved in understanding one’s self-location in external space (Craig, 2003; Lanius et al., 2005; Heydrich and Blanke, 2013; Simmons et al., 2013; Suzuki et al., 2013).”
From How Processing of Sensory Information From the Internal and External Worlds Shape the Perception and Engagement With the World in the Aftermath of Trauma: Implications for PTSD (2021) · cites this paper as Lanius et al., 2005
Individuals with PTSD + DS exhibit increased v/l PAG functional connectivity with OP2 and TPJ, primary vestibular-multisensory processing regions associated with depersonalization symptoms.
“Alternatively, individuals with PTSD + DS exhibited increased v/l PAG functional connectivity with OP2 and TPJ, primary vestibular-multisensory processing regions ( Ibitoye et al., 2022 ) associated with depersonalization symptoms ( Lanius et al., 2005 ; Harricharan et al., 2017 ).”
From The brain-body disconnect: A somatic sensory basis for trauma-related disorders (2022) · cites this paper as Lanius et al., 2005
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 66 · Cited by 260
- Authors
- Lanius, R. A., Williamson, P. C., Bluhm, R. L., Densmore, M., Boksman, K., Neufeld, R. W. J., Gati, J. S., & Menon, R. S.
- Affiliations
- Western University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Lanius, Ruth A.
- Venue
- Biological Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-04
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 873-884
- ISSN
- 0006-3223 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1966806791
- Cited by
- 260
- References
- 66
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 18
- FWCI
- 12.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
- Keywords
- post-traumatic stress disorder, dissociation, script-driven imagery, functional connectivity, ventrolateral thalamic nucleus, cingulate gyrus, insula, body perception, flashbacks, artificial neural networks
- MeSH terms
- Accidents, Traffic, Adolescent, Adult, Child, Child Abuse, Child Abuse, Sexual, Child, Preschool, Dissociative Disorders, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Nerve Net, Photic Stimulation, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Mental Recall, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Violence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review