Prospective assessment of stereotactic ablative surgery for intractable major depression
Abstract
Background Despite therapeutic advances for major depression, a subset of patients with this disorder does not respond to conventional treatment. Stereotactic ablative procedures such as anterior cingulotomy have been performed in severely affected, treatment-resistant patients, but the long-term results of such procedures are not fully understood. Methods Findings are reported for 33 patients with severe treatment-resistant major depression who underwent ablative stereotactic procedures (dorsal anterior cingulotomy followed if necessary by subcaudate tractotomy). Preoperative and long-term postoperative Beck Depression Inventory scores were obtained along with postoperative Clinical Global Improvement values. Both were analyzed to evaluate patients' responses to the surgical procedure(s). Results At mean follow-up of 30 months after one or more stereotactic ablative procedures, 11 patients (33.3%) were classified as responders, 14 (42.4%) were partial responders, and 8 (24.2%) did not respond to the surgical procedure(s). Among those (17) who underwent only one procedure, seven (41.2%) responded, whereas six (35.3%) and four (23.5%) showed partial or no response, respectively. Among patients who required multiple surgical procedures, four patients (25%) responded, whereas eight (50%) and four (25%) patients demonstrated partial or no responses, respectively, at long-term follow-up evaluations. Conclusions Approximately 75% of depression patients previously resistant to antid…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Cingulotomy outcomes are slightly better for anxiety disorders and affective disorders, including depression, than for OCD.
“with slightly better outcomes for anxiety disorders and affective disorders, including depression (Ballantine et al., 1987; Shields et al., 2008).”
From The cingulum bundle: Anatomy, function, and dysfunction (2018) · cites this paper as Shields et al., 2008
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 25 · Cited by 109
- Authors
- Shields, D. C., Asaad, W., Eskandar, E. N., Jain, F. A., Cosgrove, G. R., Flaherty, A. W., Cassem, E. H., Price, B. H., Rauch, S. L., & Dougherty, D. D.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Biological Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-09
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 449-454
- ISSN
- 0006-3223 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1964720371
- Cited by
- 109
- References
- 25
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 3.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
- Keywords
- treatment-resistant depression, major depressive disorder, anterior cingulotomy, long-term outcomes, surgical response, multiple surgical procedures
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Brain, Depressive Disorder, Major, Major Depressive Disorder, Female, Gyrus Cinguli, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Severity of Illness Index, Radiosurgery, Neurosurgical Procedures, Ablation Techniques, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review