Neural correlates of eye gaze processing in the infant broader autism phenotype
Abstract
Background Studies of infant siblings of children diagnosed with autism have allowed for a prospective approach to study the emergence of autism in infancy and revealed early behavioral characteristics of the broader autism phenotype. In view of previous findings of atypical eye gaze processing in children and adults with autism, the aim of this study was to examine the early autism phenotype in infant siblings of children diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder (sib-ASD), focusing on the neural correlates of direct compared with averted gaze. Methods A group of 19 sib-ASD was compared with 17 control infants with no family history of ASD (mean age=10 months) on their response to direct versus averted gaze in static stimuli. Results Relative to the control group, the sib-ASD group showed prolonged latency of the occipital P400 event-related potentials component in response to direct gaze, but they did not differ in earlier components. Similarly, time-frequency analysis of high-frequency oscillatory activity in the gamma band showed group differences in response to direct gaze, where induced gamma activity was late and less persistent over the right temporal region in the sib-ASD group. Conclusion This study suggests that a broader autism phenotype, which includes an atypical response to direct gaze, is manifest early in infancy.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Direct gaze, independent of the symmetry cues provided by differences between straight-ahead direct and averted gaze, is more problematic for those on the autism spectrum to process.
“Another difference noted between ASD and control groups, which may be related, is that direct gaze (independent of the symmetry cues provided by differences between straight-ahead direct and averted gaze) is more problematic for those on the autism spectrum to process.”
From Vision in autism spectrum disorders (2009) · cites this paper as Elsabbagh et al., 2009
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 61 · Cited by 206
- Authors
- Elsabbagh, M., Volein, A., Csibra, G., Holmboe, K., Garwood, H., Tucker, L., Krljes, S., Baron-Cohen, S., Bolton, P., Charman, T., Baird, G., & Johnson, M. H.
- Affiliations
- University of London (GB)
- King's College London (GB)
- University College London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Elsabbagh, Mayada
- ORCID
- Venue
- Biological Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-01
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 31-38
- ISSN
- 0006-3223 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2105463909
- Cited by
- 206
- References
- 61
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 24
- FWCI
- 7.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Explore Bristol Research (publishedVersion)
- BIROn (Birkbeck, University of London) (submittedVersion)
- Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
- Open Access at Essex (University of Essex) (submittedVersion)
- Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Autism Speaks (AS1584, AS1292)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
- Keywords
- broader autism phenotype, direct gaze, averted gaze, gamma oscillations, neural correlates, autism spectrum disorder
- MeSH terms
- Autistic Disorder, Brain, Evoked Potentials, Visual, Female, Fixation, Ocular, Humans, Infant, Male, Phenotype, Psychomotor Performance, Siblings
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review