Cited by 362Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersNeurological disorders and treatmentsElectroconvulsive Therapy Studies

Deep brain stimulation for intractable obsessive compulsive disorder: pilot study using a blinded, staggered-onset design

Open access
Goodman, Wayne K., Foote, Kelly D., Greenberg, Benjamin D., Ricciuti, Nikki, Bauer, Russell, Ward, Herbert, Shapira, Nathan A., Wu, Sam S. +3 more·2010·Biological Psychiatry

Abstract

Background Prior promising results have been reported with deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the anterior limb of the internal capsule in cases with severe obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) who had exhausted conventional therapies.Methods In this pilot study, six adult patients (2 male; 4 female) meeting stringent criteria for severe (minimum Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale [Y-BOCS] of 28) and treatment-refractory OCD had DBS electrode arrays placed bilaterally in an area spanning the ventral anterior limb of the internal capsule and adjacent ventral striatum referred to as the ventral capsule/ventral striatum. Using a randomized, staggered-onset design, patients were stimulated at either 30 or 60 days following surgery under blinded conditions.Results After 12 months of stimulation, four (66.7%) of six patients met a stringent criterion as "responders" (> or =35% improvement in the Y-BOCS and end point Y-BOCS severity < or =16). Patients did not improve during sham stimulation. Depressive symptoms improved significantly in the group as a whole; global functioning improved in the four responders. Adverse events associated with chronic DBS were generally mild and modifiable with setting changes. Stimulation interruption led to rapid but reversible induction of depressive symptoms in two cases.Conclusions This pilot study suggests that DBS of the ventral capsule/ventral striatum region is a promising therapy of last resort for carefully selected cases of severe and intractable OCD. Future research should attend to subject selection, lead location, DBS programming, and mechanisms underpinning therapeutic benefits.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.11.028

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • DBS for obsessive-compulsive disorder showed significant benefit for OCD symptoms with an associated improvement in mood.

    “DBS for OCD showed significant benefit for OCD symptoms with an associated improvement in mood [49][50][51].”

    From Deep brain stimulation for depression. (2022) · cites this paper as [49]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 36 · Cited by 362

Authors
Goodman, W. K., Foote, K. D., Greenberg, B. D., Ricciuti, N., Bauer, R., Ward, H., Shapira, N. A., Wu, S. S., Hill, C. L., Rasmussen, S. A., & Okun, M. S.
Affiliations
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
  • University of Florida (US)
  • Brown University (US)
  • University of Florida Health (US)
Corresponding author
Goodman, Wayne K.
Venue
Biological Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-03
Volume
67
Issue
6
Pages
535-542
ISSN
0006-3223 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2044381962
Cited by
362
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 34
FWCI
32.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Florida (M01 RR000082)
  • Medtronic
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
Keywords
deep brain stimulation, treatment-resistant OCD, ventral capsule/ventral striatum, anterior limb of the internal capsule, sham stimulation, depressive symptoms, global functioning, adverse events
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Limbic System, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Pilot Projects, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Severity of Illness Index, Single-Blind Method, Treatment Outcome, Internal Capsule, Deep Brain Stimulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review