Deep brain stimulation for depression.
Open accessAbstract
Deep brain stimulation has been extensively studied as a therapeutic option for treatment-resistant depression (TRD). DBS across different targets is associated with on average 60% response rates in previously refractory chronically depressed patients. However, response rates vary greatly between patients and between studies and often require extensive trial-and-error optimizations of stimulation parameters. Emerging evidence from tractography imaging suggests that targeting combinations of white matter tracts, rather than specific grey matter regions, is necessary for meaningful antidepressant response to DBS. In this article, we review efficacy of various DBS targets for TRD, which networks are involved in their therapeutic effects, and how we can use this information to improve targeting and programing of DBS for individual patients. We will also highlight how to integrate these DBS network findings into developing adaptive stimulation and optimal trial designs.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This review summarizes deep brain stimulation (DBS) for treatment-resistant depression (TRD) across subcallosal cingulate, lateral habenula, ventral capsule/ventral striatum, medial forebrain bundle, and inferior thalamic peduncle targets. It reports variable but often substantial response rates, argues that white matter tract engagement is central to antidepressant effects, and calls for tractography-guided targeting, optimized trial designs, and biomarker-informed closed-loop stimulation.
Key findings
- Across 38 studies and 405 patients, the most common target was the subcallosal cingulate cortex (SCC; N = 216), followed by vALIC/VC/VS (N = 85), MFB (N = 54), LHb (N = 11), and ITP (N = 1); open-label response rates were comparable at on average about 50% after adequate parameter adjustment, with first-year SCC response rates of 20–82%, VC/VS 23–75%, and MFB 0–100%.
- Randomized sham-controlled trials often failed primary endpoints: BROADEN SCC DBS showed 20% vs 17% response at 6 months and was halted at 90/230 planned patients; RECLAIM VC/VS DBS was terminated for futility at N = 30/200 with 1-year response/remission of 20%/13%; after a 52-week open-label optimization phase, vALIC DBS showed 0% response during sham and 43.8% during active stimulation in a 12-week crossover.
- SCC tractography findings implicated a four-bundle blueprint—bilateral forceps minor, bilateral cingulum bundles, dorsal/anterior midcingulate cortices, and medial branch of the uncinate fasciculus—and prospective tractography-based targeting in N = 11 yielded 6-month response/remission of 72.7%/54.5% and 12-month response/remission of 81.9%/54.5%.
- Adverse events included 481 AEs with 12 suicide attempts and 6 suicides for SCC DBS, 330 AEs with 11 attempts and 3 suicides for VC/VS DBS, 434 AEs with 1 attempt and no completed suicides for MFB DBS, and 47 AEs with no attempts or suicides for ITP DBS; the review reports an overall suicide attempt rate of 6.7%, suggesting DBS for TRD does not increase suicide risk.
Methods
- This is a review based on an electronic search through June 2022 using keywords and MeSH terms including “deep brain stimulation,” “DBS,” “depression,” “treatment resistant depression,” and “TRD”; included studies applied chronic DBS in patients with TRD, and due to limited literature, case reports, open-label studies, and randomized clinical trials were included.
- The review screened and included 38 studies with a total of 405 patients; primary outcome measures in all but one study were HDRS-17, HDRS-24, HDRS-28, or MADRS, with HDRS response defined as ≥50% reduction and remission as score <8, and MADRS response as ≥40% reduction and remission as score ≤10.
- For anatomical/network figures, targets were displayed in ICBM 2009b Nlin asymmetric space at 0.5 × 0.5 × 0.5 mm³ resolution, a 2.5 mm radius ball was generated at each DBS target, and normative group connectome diffusion tractography data from Lead-DBS software were used to generate connectivity profiles.
Limitations
- Stated in the paper: the literature is limited and heterogeneous, including case reports and open-label studies; there are no head-to-head studies comparing targets; placebo-controlled results are mixed; and tractography cannot convey current direction through a bundle, disambiguate cell-specific connections, identify network nodes beyond first-level monosynaptic connections, or rely on a uniform methodology, and may require high-quality patient-specific diffusion scans rather than normative connectomic data.
- Stated in the paper: few reviewed studies investigated different stimulation parameters, there are no fast behavioral readouts for fine-tuning DBS in TRD, and closed-loop DBS evidence is limited to case reports and does not yet demonstrate superiority over classic DBS.
- Evident from the text: many efficacy estimates come from small, open-label, non-randomized cohorts, and when multiple studies used the same cohort, totals were calculated using the study with the largest cohort and longest follow-up; adverse event tables contain missing or “NR” data, and the review is not presented as a formal systematic meta-analysis.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 155 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingnone given
Deep brain stimulation across different targets is associated with an average response rate of about 60% in previously refractory chronically depressed patients.
“DBS across different targets is associated with on average 60% response rates in previously refractory chronically depressed patients.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
A total of 330 adverse events were reported in patients receiving ventral capsule/ventral striatum DBS.
“A total of 330 adverse events were reported in patients receiving VC/VS DBS.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
Studies of subcallosal cingulate cortex DBS for treatment-resistant depression generally use fixed frequency (130 Hz) and pulse-width (90 μs).
“While in general, studies of SCC DBS for TRD use fixed frequency (130 Hz) and pulse-width (90 μs), three studies were specifically designed to test effects of different stimulation parameters [32][33][34].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [32] Eitan, 2018, One year double blind study of high vs low frequency subcallosal cingulate stimulation for depression, J Psychiatr Res source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [33] Ramasubbu, 2013, Double-blind optimization of subcallosal cingulate deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression: a pilot study, J Psychiatry Neurosci source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [34] Ramasubbu, 2020, Long versus short pulse width subcallosal cingulate stimulation for treatment-resistant depression: a randomised, double-blind, crossover trial, Lancet Psychiatry source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingnone given
None of the studies testing different stimulation parameters modelled the white matter fibers differentially impacted by varying parameter settings.
“Unfortunately, none of these studies modelled the white matter fibers differentially impacted by varying parameter settings.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
A total of 481 adverse events were reported in studies targeting the subcallosal cingulate cortex.
“A total of 481 adverse events were reported in studies targeting the SCC.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- Findingnone given
Open-label DBS studies across targets show comparable response rates averaging about 50% in severely treatment-resistant patients when enough time is allowed for initial parameter adjustments.
“Open-label studies of DBS at various targets show comparable response rates of on average 50% in severely treatment resistant patients provided there has been adequate time for initial parameter adjustments.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
In the open-label phase of the Fenoy et al. study, the response rate at 1 week of MFB DBS was 50%.
“promising response and remission rates were observed at 1 week of MFB DBS (RS: 50%)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [70] Fenoy, 2016, Deep brain stimulation of the medial forebrain bundle: Distinctive responses in resistant depression, J Affect Disord source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [71] Fenoy, 2018, A longitudinal study on deep brain stimulation of the medial forebrain bundle for treatment-resistant depression, Transl Psychiatry source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingnone given
Reported first-year response rates for MFB DBS in 53 patients range from 0% to 100%.
“and for MFB DBS in 53 patients 0-100%.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
Only 1 of 7 patients preferred ITP stimulation over VC/VS stimulation.
“Only 1 out of 7 patients preferred ITP stimulation over VCVS stimulation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [76] Raymaekers, 2017, Deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant major depressive disorder: a comparison of two targets and long-term follow-up, Transl Psychiatry source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingnone given
In the Broaden trial, the placebo rate after 6 months was only 17%.
“in the largest double-blind placebo-controlled trial, Broaden, the placebo rate after 6 months was only 17%.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
No antidepressant placebo response was found during randomized discontinuation after an initial 1-year period of active DBS with adequate parameter optimization.
“no antidepressant placebo response was found during randomized (dis)continuation after an initial 1-year period of active DBS with adequate parameter optimization [81].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [81] Patricio Riva-Posse ALC, Kathryn Wright, Allison C. Waters, KiSueng Choi, Steven J. Garlow, Paul E. Holtzheimer, Robert E. Gross and Helen S. Mayberg. Rapid antidepressant effects of deep brain stimulation and their relation to surgical protocol. Biol Psychiatry. 2020;88(8):e37-e9. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation
In the Fenoy et al. single-blind phase, no significant difference was found between blinded on and off conditions.
“Results do not indicate any significant difference between blinded on/off conditions”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [70] Fenoy, 2016, Deep brain stimulation of the medial forebrain bundle: Distinctive responses in resistant depression, J Affect Disord source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [71] Fenoy, 2018, A longitudinal study on deep brain stimulation of the medial forebrain bundle for treatment-resistant depression, Transl Psychiatry source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation
In a 12-month randomized trial, no significant difference was found between sham and stimulation groups during the first 2 months.
“Results do not demonstrate a significant difference between sham and stimulation groups during the first 2 months”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [72] Coenen, 2019, Superolateral medial forebrain bundle deep brain stimulation in major depression: a gateway trial, Neuropsychopharmacology source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
The only reported device-related adverse event in MFB DBS is contact malfunction in one patient.
“The only reported device-related adverse event is contact malfunction in one patient.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
Raymaekers et al. found no significant difference between VC/VS and ITP targets in seven treatment-resistant depression patients.
“Raymaekers et al. [76] fail to demonstrate significant difference between targets.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [76] Raymaekers, 2017, Deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant major depressive disorder: a comparison of two targets and long-term follow-up, Transl Psychiatry source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation
In seven patients implanted with bilateral VC/VS and ITP electrodes, no significant difference between targets was found.
“Results do not demonstrate any significant difference between targets.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [76] Raymaekers, 2017, Deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant major depressive disorder: a comparison of two targets and long-term follow-up, Transl Psychiatry source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation
The first case study of ITP-DBS for treatment-resistant depression showed remission at 12 months and at last follow-up.
“The first case study of ITP-DBS for TRD demonstrated remission at 12 months and last follow-up [75].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [75] Jimenez F, Velasco F, Salin-Pascual R, Hernandez JA, Velasco M, Criales JL, et al. A patient with a resistant major depression disorder treated with deep brain stimulation in the inferior thalamic peduncle. Neurosurgery. 2005;57(3):585–93; discussion -93. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingnone given
Results from placebo-controlled DBS studies have been mixed.
“results from placebo-controlled studies have been mixed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Reported first-year response rates for SCC DBS in over 200 patients range from 20% to 82%.
“Reported response rates in the first year of SCC DBS in over 200 patients range between 20 and 82%”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Common surgery-related adverse events in MFB DBS include hemorrhage and infection.
“Common surgery-related adverse events include hemorrhage and infection.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
Among patients receiving MFB DBS, 434 adverse events were reported.
“In patients receiving MFB DBS, 434 adverse events were reported.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
Re-implantation at VC/VS led to remission that was sustained over a 1-year period.
“Re-implantation at the VC/VS led to remission which has been sustained over a 1-year period.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [68] Blomstedt, 2017, Deep brain stimulation in the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis and medial forebrain bundle in a patient with major depressive disorder and anorexia nervosa, Clin Case Rep source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation
After SCC DBS discontinuation, depressive symptoms remained in remission at 3 months in 2 of 5 patients.
“depressive symptoms remained in remission 3 months after SCC DBS discontinuation in 2/5 patients [27]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [27] Puigdemont, 2015, A randomized double-blind crossover trial of deep brain stimulation of the subcallosal cingulate gyrus in patients with treatment-resistant depression: a pilot study of relapse prevention, J Psychiatry Neurosci source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingnone given
High response rates are reported in studies using patient-specific targeting of white matter maps determined in previous responders.
“High response rates are reported in studies applying patient-specific target- ing of white matter maps that were determined in previous responders.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
Reported first-year response rates for VC/VS DBS in 85 patients range from 23% to 75%.
“for VC/VS in 85 patients 23-75%”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
One retrospective group analysis supports improved outcomes with lead placements closer to white matter internal capsule bundles between the prefrontal cortex, thalamus, and brainstem, but without further specificity.
“One retrospective group analysis supports improved outcomes with lead placements closer to white matter internal capsule bundles between the prefrontal cortex, thalamus and brainstem [90] but without further specificity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [90] Liebrand, 2020, Distance to white matter trajectories is associated with treatment response to internal capsule deep brain stimulation in treatment-refractory depression, Neuroimage Clin source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation
To date, there is no evidence in DBS for treatment-resistant depression that depression symptom dimensions measured by HRDS or MADRS change selectively or at different rates.
“to date, there is no evidence in DBS for TRD that depression symptom dimensions as measured by the HRDS or MADRS change selectively or at different rates”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
Non-response was reported in a recent case study of two patients despite following the same tractography-based targeting method.
“Non-response, however, was reported in a recent case study of two patients despite following the same tractography-based targeting method [69].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [69] Davidson, 2020, Lack of clinical response to deep brain stimulation of the medial forebrain bundle in depression, Brain Stimul source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingnone given
MFB case series and trials have reported high response rates overall.
“MFB case series and trials have reported high response rates overall.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
In a case study, the HDRS-measured effect of MFB DBS was masked by mood variability and by more marked periods of benefit and decline measured with CAT-DI.
“in a case study, the effect of MFB DBS measured with the HDRS was masked by the variability in mood and more marked periods of benefit and decline measured with a computerized adaptive test (CAT-DI)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [13] Sani, 2017, High-frequency measurement of depressive severity in a patient treated for severe treatment-resistant depression with deep-brain stimulation, Transl Psychiatry source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation
Symptom relapse within a day was observed after discontinuation of VC/VS DBS.
“symptom relapse within a day was observed after discontinuation of VC/VS DBS [9].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [9] Bergfeld, 2016, Deep brain stimulation of the ventral anterior limb of the internal capsule for treatment-resistant depression: a randomized clinical trial, JAMA Psychiat source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation
For SCC DBS, consistent tractography-based targeting of a site structurally connected to the forceps minor, uncinate fasciculus, cingulum bundle, and frontostriatal fibers was associated with an 88% response rate.
“For SCC DBS, consistent tractographybased targeting of a site in the SCC region structurally connected to the forceps minor, uncinate fasciculus, cingulum bundle, and frontostriatal fibers was associated with an 88% response rate [88]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [88] Sendi, 2021, Intraoperative neural signals predict rapid antidepressant effects of deep brain stimulation, Transl Psychiatry source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation
Carryover antidepressant effects of at least 1 week have been observed after transient intraoperative SCC or MFB stimulation.
“carryover antidepressant effects of at least 1 week have been observed after transient intraoperative stimulation of the SCC [81] or MFB [71]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [81] Patricio Riva-Posse ALC, Kathryn Wright, Allison C. Waters, KiSueng Choi, Steven J. Garlow, Paul E. Holtzheimer, Robert E. Gross and Helen S. Mayberg. Rapid antidepressant effects of deep brain stimulation and their relation to surgical protocol. Biol Psychiatry. 2020;88(8):e37-e9. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [71] Fenoy, 2018, A longitudinal study on deep brain stimulation of the medial forebrain bundle for treatment-resistant depression, Transl Psychiatry source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingnone given
No data are yet available using tractography-based targeting to define necessary or sufficient tracts for depression.
“though no data are available yet using tractography-based targeting to define the necessary nor sufficient tracts for depression.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
In chronic SCC-DBS, local field potential 1/f slope changes recorded weekly at the right SCC lead during the first 6 months discriminated depressed from non-depressed states in three of four patients.
“local field potential changes in 1/f slope, a putative correlate of neuronal excitability, recorded weekly at the right SCC-lead during the first 6 months of SCC-DBS discriminated depressed from non-depressed states in three out of the four patients [85].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [85] Veerakumar, 2019, Field potential 1/f activity in the subcallosal cingulate region as a candidate signal for monitoring deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression, J Neurophysiol source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingnone given
Only a few reviewed studies investigated the effect of different stimulation parameters.
“Only few of the reviewed studies investigated the effect of different stimulation parameters.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
During 10 days of intracranial mapping, amygdala gamma power correlated with high depressive symptom states measured several times daily.
“amygdala gamma power correlated with high depressive symptom states measured several times daily.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [109] Scangos, 2021, Closed-loop neuromodulation in an individual with treatment-resistant depression, Nat Med source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation
Low-frequency stimulation does not seem to be effective.
“Low-frequency stimulation does not seem to be effective [32]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [32] Eitan, 2018, One year double blind study of high vs low frequency subcallosal cingulate stimulation for depression, J Psychiatr Res source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation
Closed-loop DBS was recently piloted in a patient with treatment-resistant depression.
“Closed-loop DBS was recently piloted in a TRD patient [109].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [109] Scangos, 2021, Closed-loop neuromodulation in an individual with treatment-resistant depression, Nat Med source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingnone given
None of the reviewed studies systematically investigated antidepressant augmentation strategies for DBS.
“None of the reviewed studies systematically investigated antidepressant augmentation strategies for DBS.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
ECT was safely augmented to SCC DBS in one patient who relapsed, after which depression remained in remission with continued DBS.
“ECT was safely augmented to SCC DBS in one patient who relapsed after which the depression remained in remission with continued DBS [112].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [112] Puigdemont, 2009, Depressive relapse after initial response to subcallosal cingulate gyrus-deep brain stimulation in a patient with a treatment-resistant depression: electroconvulsive therapy as a feasible strategy, Biol Psychiatry source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation
In psychiatric DBS, early reports describe changes in brain activity when mood changes occur.
“In psychiatric DBS, there are early reports of changes that occur in brain activity when changes in mood occur.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Across the four pooled lateral habenula deep brain stimulation studies totaling 11 patients, the response rate was 85.7%.
“Total* | | | N = 11 | | 85.7% | 53.6% | |”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [45] Sartorius, 2010, Remission of major depression under deep brain stimulation of the lateral habenula in a therapy-refractory patient, Biol Psychiatry source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [46] Kiening, 2013, A new translational target for deep brain stimulation to treat depression, EMBO Mol Med source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [47] Zhang C, Zhang Y, Luo H, Xu X, Yuan T-f, Li D, et al. Bilateral Habenula deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression: clinical findings and electrophysiological features. Translational Psychiatry. 2022;12(1):52. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: The four lateral habenula deep brain stimulation studies pooled in the total row are sufficiently comparable in patient population, stimulation parameters, and outcome definitions to justify aggregating their response and remission rates.
- Findingown data
Across the four pooled lateral habenula deep brain stimulation studies totaling 11 patients, the remission rate was 53.6%.
“Total* | | | N = 11 | | 85.7% | 53.6% | |”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [45] Sartorius, 2010, Remission of major depression under deep brain stimulation of the lateral habenula in a therapy-refractory patient, Biol Psychiatry source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [46] Kiening, 2013, A new translational target for deep brain stimulation to treat depression, EMBO Mol Med source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [47] Zhang C, Zhang Y, Luo H, Xu X, Yuan T-f, Li D, et al. Bilateral Habenula deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression: clinical findings and electrophysiological features. Translational Psychiatry. 2022;12(1):52. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: The four lateral habenula deep brain stimulation studies pooled in the total row are sufficiently comparable in patient population, stimulation parameters, and outcome definitions to justify aggregating their response and remission rates.
- Premisecitation
The BROADEN trial was halted by the sponsor at 90 of 230 planned patients due to low probability to meet the pre-study established primary endpoint.
“Nevertheless, the study was halted by the sponsor at the halfway mark (90/230 planned patients) due to low probability to meet the pre-study established primary endpoint.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [28] Holtzheimer, 2017, Subcallosal cingulate deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression: a multisite, randomised, sham-controlled trial, Lancet Psychiatry source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationnone given
Emerging evidence from tractography imaging suggests that targeting combinations of white matter tracts, rather than specific grey matter regions, is necessary for meaningful antidepressant response to DBS.
“Emerging evidence from tractography imaging suggests that targeting combinations of white matter tracts, rather than specific grey matter regions, is necessary for meaningful antidepressant response to DBS.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
In the BROADEN trial, continued observation showed significant response and remission rates from 12 months (RS: 29%, RM: 14%) to 24 months (RS: 49%, RM: 26%).
“However, continued observation of the patients showed significant response and remission rates from 12 months (RS: 29%, RM: 14%) to 24 months (RS: 49%, RM: 26%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [28] Holtzheimer, 2017, Subcallosal cingulate deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression: a multisite, randomised, sham-controlled trial, Lancet Psychiatry source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The subcallosal cingulate cortex is a critical node within a putative mood regulatory circuit, based on functional imaging literature.
“This region was considered a critical node within a putative mood regulatory circuit, based on a large body of functional imaging literature.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Recent studies suggest maximal clinical efficacy of subcallosal cingulate cortex DBS is directly correlated with the specific white matter tracts affected rather than anatomic location of stimulation as defined by traditional gray-white matter landmarks.
“Recent studies suggest maximal clinical efficacy of SCC DBS is directly correlated with the specific white matter tracts affected rather than anatomic location of stimulation as defined by traditional gray-white matter landmarks [6].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [6] Riva-Posse, 2014, Defining critical white matter pathways mediating successful subcallosal cingulate deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression, Biol Psychiat source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Responders to subcallosal cingulate cortex DBS shared a common map of stimulated fibers including bilateral forceps minor, bilateral cingulum bundles, dorsal and anterior midcingulate cortices, and medial branch of uncinated fasciculus.
“Responders shared a common map of stimulated fibers including bilateral forceps minor, bilateral cingulum bundles, dorsal and anterior midcingulate cortices, and medial branch of uncinated fasciculus.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [26] Holtzheimer, 2012, Subcallosal cingulate deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant unipolar and bipolar depression, Arch Gen Psychiatry source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The medial forebrain bundle was selected as a DBS-target for treatment-resistant depression based on its key function within the reward circuit.
“The medial forebrain bundle (MFB) was selected as a DBS-target for TRD based on its key function within the reward circuit [63,64].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [63] Klanker, 2017, Deep brain stimulation of the medial forebrain bundle elevates striatal dopamine concentration without affecting spontaneous or reward-induced phasic release, Neuroscience source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [64] Schlaepfer, 2014, Deep brain stimulation of the human reward system for major depression–rationale, outcomes and outlook, Neuropsychopharmacology source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The superolateral branch of the medial forebrain bundle connects the ventral tegmental area to the orbitofrontal cortex and ventromedial prefrontal cortex via the ventral capsule/ventral striatum.
“The superolateral branch of the MFB connects the VTA to the OFC and vmPFC via the VC/VS [65].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [65] Coenen, 2018, The anatomy of the human medial forebrain bundle: ventral tegmental area connections to reward-associated subcortical and frontal lobe regions, Neuroimage Clin source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
In a retrospective analysis, clinical response to subcallosal cingulate cortex DBS was mediated by a direct impact on a combination of four fiber bundles passing through the SCC region.
“Using individual activation volumes and probabilistic tractography, they revealed that clinical response to SCC DBS was mediated by a direct impact on a combination of four fiber bundles passing through the SCC region.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [26] Holtzheimer, 2012, Subcallosal cingulate deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant unipolar and bipolar depression, Arch Gen Psychiatry source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
In a single-site study, ventral capsule/ventral striatum DBS demonstrated comparable benefits in 10 patients at 1-year (RS: 50%, RM: 30%) and at 2-year follow-ups (RS: 45.5%, RM: 9.1%).
“The second, single-site study demonstrated comparable benefits in 10 patients at 1-year (RS: 50%, RM: 30%) and at 2-year follow-ups (RS: 45.5%, RM: 9.1%) [58,59].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [58] Bewernick BH, Hurlemann R, Matusch A. Nucleus accumbens deep brain stimulation decreases ratings of depression and anxiety in treatment-resistant depression. Biol Psychiatry doi101016jbiopsych09013. 2009;67(2 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.09.013 SRC - BaiduScholar):110–6. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [59] Bewernick, 2012, Long-term effects of nucleus accumbens deep brain stimulation in treatment-resistant depression: evidence for sustained efficacy, Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Ventral capsule/ventral striatum DBS in obsessive-compulsive disorder patients modulates a circuit connecting the orbitofrontal cortex, ventromedial prefrontal cortex, and dorsal anterior cingulate with striatum, thalamus, and brainstem.
“In addition, VC/VS DBS in OCD patients modulates a circuit connecting the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC), ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC), and dorsal anterior cingulate (dACC) with striatum, thalamus, and brainstem [52][53][54].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [52] Figee, 2013, Deep brain stimulation restores frontostriatal network activity in obsessive-compulsive disorder, Nat Neurosci source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [53] Haber, 2013, Translational research in OCD: circuitry and mechanisms, Neuropsychopharmacology source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [54] Nanda, 2017, Connectivity-based parcellation of the anterior limb of the internal capsule, Hum Brain Mapp source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The first open-label study targeting the medial forebrain bundle in 8 treatment-resistant depression patients showed high response rates from 6 weeks (RS: 85.7%) to 1 year (RS: 75%, RM: 50%).
“The first open-label study targeting the MFB in 8 TRD patients showed high response rates from 6 weeks (RS: 85.7%), to 1 year (RS: 75%, RM: 50%) [8,66].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [8] Schlaepfer, 2013, Rapid effects of deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant major depression, Biol Psychiatry source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [66] Bewernick, 2017, Deep brain stimulation to the medial forebrain bundle for depression- long-term outcomes and a novel data analysis strategy, Brain Stimul source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
In a multi-center study, Malone and colleagues demonstrated antidepressant effects in 15 patients at a minimum of 6-month follow-up (RS: 53.3%, RM: 40%).
“In a multi-center study, Malone and colleagues demonstrated antidepressant effects in 15 patients at a minimum of 6-month follow-up (RS: 53.3%, RM: 40%) [57].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [57] Malone, 2009, Deep brain stimulation of the ventral capsule/ventral striatum for treatment-resistant depression, Biol Psychiat source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The lateral habenula is implicated in negative mood states in both animal and human research.
“The LHb is implicated in negative mood states in both animal and human research.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 4 sources checked- cites [40] Henn, 2005, Stress models of depression: forming genetically vulnerable strains, Neurosci Biobehav Rev source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [41] Shumake, 2003, Opposite metabolic changes in the habenula and ventral tegmental area of a genetic model of helpless behavior, Brain Res source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [42] Morris, 1999, Covariation of activity in habenula and dorsal raphe nuclei following tryptophan depletion, Neuroimage source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [43] Ranft, 2010, Evidence for structural abnormalities of the human habenular complex in affective disorders but not in schizophrenia, Psychol Med source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
The lack of significant differences between active and control groups in the RECLAIM trial may be attributed to insufficient duration of the optimization phase and an experimental window that was too short.
“The lack of significant differences between active and control groups may be attributed to insufficient duration of the optimization phase, and an experimental window that was too short.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [61] Dougherty, 2015, A Randomized sham-controlled trial of deep brain stimulation of the ventral capsule/ventral striatum for chronic treatment-resistant depression, Biol Psychiat source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
In a prospective open-label study using individualized tractography targeting based on a group connectome blueprint, subcallosal cingulate cortex DBS produced response and remission rates at 6 months (RS: 72.7%, RM: 54.5%) and 12 months (RS: 81.9%, RM: 54.5%).
“When all patients had bilateral contacts activated that matched the four-bundle blueprint a significant and large response and remission rates was observed at 6 months (RS: 72.7%, RM: 54.5%) and 12 months (RS: 81.9%, RM: 54.5%).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [29] Riva-Posse, 2018, A connectomic approach for subcallosal cingulate deep brain stimulation surgery: prospective targeting in treatment-resistant depression, Mol Psychiatry source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The lateral habenula is an epithalamic structure mediating communication between the forebrain and monoaminergic systems in the midbrain and hindbrain.
“The lateral habenula (LHb) is an epithalamic structure mediating communication between the forebrain and monoaminergic systems in the midbrain and hindbrain [38,39].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation
In a randomized controlled study of ventral anterior limb of the internal capsule DBS for treatment-resistant depression by Bergfeld et al., after a 52-week open-label optimization phase, a 12-week double-blind crossover phase showed a response rate of 0% during sham stimulation and 43.8% during active DBS.
“Following a 52-week open-label optimization phase, patients entered a 12-week double-blind crossover phase to test for placebo effects.During the crossover phase, response rate was 0% during sham-stimulation and 43.8% during active DBS.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [9] Bergfeld, 2016, Deep brain stimulation of the ventral anterior limb of the internal capsule for treatment-resistant depression: a randomized clinical trial, JAMA Psychiat source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
In the RECLAIM trial, open-label response and remission rates were lower than previous open-label studies at 1 year (RS: 20%, RM: 13%) and 2 years (RS: 23.3%, RM: 20%).
“Open-label response and remission rates were lower than previous open-label studies at 1 year (RS: 20%, RM: 13%) and 2 years (RS: 23.3%, RM: 20%).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [61] Dougherty, 2015, A Randomized sham-controlled trial of deep brain stimulation of the ventral capsule/ventral striatum for chronic treatment-resistant depression, Biol Psychiat source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Relapses after accidental stimulation discontinuation due to device malfunctions, despite sustained response and remission over years, make chronic placebo explanation unlikely for long-term DBS effects.
“Notable are relapses after accidental stimulation discontinuation due to unrecognized device malfunctions (lead fracture, IPG dysfunction, or battery depletion), even in the presence of sustained response and remission rates over many years of ongoing active DBS, which make it seem unlikely that the long-term antidepressant effects of DBS can be attributed to chronic placebo effects.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Naturalistic placebo discontinuation studies provide additional compelling evidence of actual antidepressant effects of DBS at various target sites.
“Naturalistic placebo discontinuation studies offer additional compelling evidence of the actual antidepressant effects of DBS in various target sites.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
In a third case study, two patients with dMRI-guided DBS of the medial forebrain bundle did not reach responder status at any point over the study period of 6 months.
“In a third case study, two patients with dMRI-guided DBS of the MFB did not reach responder status at any point over the study period of 6 months [69].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [69] Davidson, 2020, Lack of clinical response to deep brain stimulation of the medial forebrain bundle in depression, Brain Stimul source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Sham surgeries often show significant placebo effects.
“sham surgeries often show significant placebo effects [80]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [80] Tavel, 2014, The placebo effect: the good, the bad, and the ugly, Am J Med source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Placebo rates are minimal in the most severely depressed patients who are eligible for DBS trials.
“these rates are minimal in the most severely depressed patients that also are eligible for DBS trials [79].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [79] Licht RW, Danish University Antidepressant G. Is it possible to evaluate true prophylactic efficacy of antidepressants in severely ill patients with recurrent depression? Lessons from a placebo-controlled trial. The fifth trial of the Danish University Antidepressant Group (DUAG-5). J Affect Disord. 2013;148(2–3):286–90. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
The effects of stimulation discontinuation may differ depending on the antidepressant target.
“the effects of stimulation discontinuation may differ depending on the antidepressant target.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Acute antidepressant effects after surgery regardless of stimulation condition may be due to microlesioning or placebo.
“Acute antidepressant effects following surgery regardless of stimulation condition could be attributed to either microlesioning effects or to placebo.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Sham placebo effects might have contributed to comparable antidepressant effects of real and sham DBS shortly after surgery.
“which might have contributed to comparable antidepressant effects of real and sham DBS shortly after surgery.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationnone given
The crucial MFB white matter branches and their cortical and subcortical targets needed for early and sustained antidepressant effects while avoiding side effects have not yet been delineated.
“there has been no delineation so far of the crucial white matter MFB branches and their respective cortical and subcortical targets necessary to achieve early and sustained antidepressant effects and avoid side effects.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The first manifestation of effective SCC DBS is usually relief of negative affect and changes in physical awareness.
“the first manifestation of effective SCC DBS is usually a relief of negative affect and changes in physical awareness [98]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [98] Crowell, 2015, Characterizing the therapeutic response to deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression: a single center long-term perspective, Front Integr Neurosci source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
Implementing tractography-based surgical targeting into routine clinical practice may be challenging because it requires high-quality patient-specific diffusion-weighted scans rather than normative connectomic data.
“implementing tractography based surgical targeting into routine clinical practice may be challenging since it requires high-quality patient-specific diffusion-weighted scans rather than normative connectomic data [72].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [72] Coenen, 2019, Superolateral medial forebrain bundle deep brain stimulation in major depression: a gateway trial, Neuropsychopharmacology source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
VC/VS stimulation may be very different from SCC stimulation, which involves monosynaptic white matter fibers to part of the NAc and thalamus that do not pass through the ALIC.
“Thus, VC/VS stimulation may be very different from SCC stimulation that involves monosynaptic white matter fibers to part of the NAc and thalamus that do not pass through the ALIC [93].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [93] Zhu, 2021, A connectomic analysis of deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression, Brain Stimul source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
These opposite modulatory entrances into the same circuit appear to result in different but related antidepressant outcomes.
“These opposite modulatory entrances into the same circuit appear to result in different but related antidepressant outcomes [97].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [97] Eggers, 2014, Treatment of depression with deep brain stimulation works by altering in specific ways the conscious perception of the core symptoms of sadness or anhedonia, not by modulating network circuitry, Med Hypotheses source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
VC/VS DBS may exert bottom-up regulation of a limbic-motivational circuit that SCC DBS regulates in an opposite top-down fashion.
“VC/VS DBS may thus exert “bottom-up” regulation of a similar limbic-motivational circuit that SCC DBS regulates in an opposite “top-down” fashion.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
For VC/VS DBS, a complex combination of internal capsule fibers to the ventrolateral and medial prefrontal cortex is consistently associated with response in DBS for OCD.
“For VC/VS DBS, a complex combination of internal capsule fibers to the ventrolateral and medial prefrontal cortex is consistently associated to response in DBS for OCD [89]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [89] Figee, 2021, Deep brain stimulation for obsessive-compulsive disorder: why anatomy matters, Biol Psychiatry source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given
MFB DBS trials have used individual tractography-targeting since their first reports.
“MFB DBS trials have used individual tractography-targeting since their first reports.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Historically, most targets discussed were identified pre-surgically in standard stereotactic anatomical space based on atlases.
“Historically, most targets discussed here have been identified pre-surgically in standard stereotactic anatomical space based on atlases [11,87].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [11] Horn, 2019, Lead-DBS v2: Towards a comprehensive pipeline for deep brain stimulation imaging, Neuroimage source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [87] Nowinski WL, Fang A, Nguyen BT. editor Schaltenbrand-Wahren-Talairach-Tournoux brain atlas registration. Proc SPIE 2431, Medical Imaging: Image Display. 1995. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
A reason for comparable effectiveness across targets may be their partially overlapping connections.
“A reason behind this comparable effectiveness across targets may be their partially overlapping connections.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Patients responding to NAc DBS report acutely improved motivation for pleasurable activities.
“patients responding to DBS of the NAc, a region more associated with reward and positive affect, report acutely improved motivation for pleasurable activities [99].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [99] Schlaepfer, 2008, Deep brain stimulation to reward circuitry alleviates anhedonia in refractory major depression, Neuropsychopharmacology source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
Bilateral stimulation of all four white matter tracts appears necessary for a full response in SCC DBS.
“bilateral stimulation of all four white matter tracts appears required to achieve a full response [6].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [6] Riva-Posse, 2014, Defining critical white matter pathways mediating successful subcallosal cingulate deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression, Biol Psychiat source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Atlas-based target selection does not account for patient-specific variability of white matter fibers relative to the predefined standard DBS target.
“Atlas-based target selection does not consider the patient-specific variability of white matter fibers in relation to the predefined standard DBS target.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Outcomes in all patients may be enhanced through the addition of rehabilitative and behavioral treatments.
“Regardless of target selection, outcomes in all patients may be enhanced through the addition of rehabilitative and behavioral treatments.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The treatment-resistant depression patient population has an average disease duration lasting many years.
- Premisecitation
In the Sartorius et al 2010 case study of one patient with treatment-resistant depression, lateral habenula deep brain stimulation yielded a 100% response rate at 14 months, measured by HDRS.
“| | Sartorius et al | 2010 Case study | N = 1 | 14 | 100.0% | 100.0% | HDRS |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [45] Sartorius, 2010, Remission of major depression under deep brain stimulation of the lateral habenula in a therapy-refractory patient, Biol Psychiatry source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
In the Zhang et al 2022 open-label study of seven patients with treatment-resistant depression, lateral habenula deep brain stimulation yielded a 14.3% remission rate at 1 to 12 months, measured by HDRS.
“| | Zhang et al | 2022 Open label | N = 7 | 1-12 | 42.9% | 14.3% | HDRS |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [47] Zhang C, Zhang Y, Luo H, Xu X, Yuan T-f, Li D, et al. Bilateral Habenula deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression: clinical findings and electrophysiological features. Translational Psychiatry. 2022;12(1):52. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
In the Malone et al 2009 open-label study of 15 patients with treatment-resistant depression, ventral capsule/ventral striatum deep brain stimulation yielded a 53.3% response rate at 6 months, measured by HDRS.
“| | Malone et al | 2009 Open label | N = 15 | 6 | 53.3% | 40.0% | HDRS |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [57] Malone, 2009, Deep brain stimulation of the ventral capsule/ventral striatum for treatment-resistant depression, Biol Psychiat source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
In the Bewernick et al 2012 open-label study of 11 patients with treatment-resistant depression, ventral capsule/ventral striatum deep brain stimulation yielded a 48.4% response rate at 24 months, measured by HDRS.
“| | Bewernick et al | 2012 Open label | N = 11 | 24 | 48.4% | 45.5% | HDRS |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [59] Bewernick, 2012, Long-term effects of nucleus accumbens deep brain stimulation in treatment-resistant depression: evidence for sustained efficacy, Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
In the Bewernick et al 2009 open-label study of 10 patients with treatment-resistant depression, ventral capsule/ventral striatum deep brain stimulation yielded a 50.0% remission rate at 12 months, measured by HDRS.
“| | Bewernick et al | 2009 Open label | N = 10 | 12 | 48.6% | 50.0% | HDRS |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [58] Bewernick BH, Hurlemann R, Matusch A. Nucleus accumbens deep brain stimulation decreases ratings of depression and anxiety in treatment-resistant depression. Biol Psychiatry doi101016jbiopsych09013. 2009;67(2 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.09.013 SRC - BaiduScholar):110–6. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Intraoperative shifts in mood in direct response to effective stimulation have been described.
“This has been described in intraoperative shifts in mood in direct response to effective stimulation [108].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [108] Smart, 2018, Initial unilateral exposure to deep brain stimulation in treatment-resistant depression patients alters spectral power in the subcallosal cingulate, Front Comput Neurosci source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Tractography studies in healthy individuals show that the MFB connects the VTA with the OFC and medial and dorsolateral prefrontal cortices via the VC/VS, forming a circuit involved in reward, motivation, and emotion processing.
“Tractography studies in healthy individuals have revealed that the MFB connects the ventral tegmental area (VTA) with the OFC and medial and dorsolateral prefrontal cortices via the VC/VS, together constituting a circuit involved in the processing of rewards, motivation, and emotions [65].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [65] Coenen, 2018, The anatomy of the human medial forebrain bundle: ventral tegmental area connections to reward-associated subcortical and frontal lobe regions, Neuroimage Clin source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
In the Zhang et al 2022 open-label study of seven patients with treatment-resistant depression, lateral habenula deep brain stimulation yielded a 42.9% response rate at 1 to 12 months, measured by HDRS.
“| | Zhang et al | 2022 Open label | N = 7 | 1-12 | 42.9% | 14.3% | HDRS |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [47] Zhang C, Zhang Y, Luo H, Xu X, Yuan T-f, Li D, et al. Bilateral Habenula deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression: clinical findings and electrophysiological features. Translational Psychiatry. 2022;12(1):52. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
It is likely that patients within a specific symptom subgroup will respond preferentially to different targets.
“Therefore, it is likely that patients within a specific subgroup of symptoms will respond preferentially to different targets.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Rehabilitation and behavioral therapy have been shown to have an additive effect for patients receiving DBS for OCD.
“Rehabilitation and behavioral therapy have been shown to have an additive effect for patients receiving DBS for OCD [113].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [113] Mantione, 2014, Cognitive-behavioural therapy augments the effects of deep brain stimulation in obsessive-compulsive disorder, Psychol Med source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
In the Bewernick et al 2009 open-label study of 10 patients with treatment-resistant depression, ventral capsule/ventral striatum deep brain stimulation yielded a 48.6% response rate at 12 months, measured by HDRS.
“| | Bewernick et al | 2009 Open label | N = 10 | 12 | 48.6% | 50.0% | HDRS |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [58] Bewernick BH, Hurlemann R, Matusch A. Nucleus accumbens deep brain stimulation decreases ratings of depression and anxiety in treatment-resistant depression. Biol Psychiatry doi101016jbiopsych09013. 2009;67(2 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.09.013 SRC - BaiduScholar):110–6. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
In the Malone et al 2009 open-label study of 15 patients with treatment-resistant depression, ventral capsule/ventral striatum deep brain stimulation yielded a 40.0% remission rate at 6 months, measured by HDRS.
“| | Malone et al | 2009 Open label | N = 15 | 6 | 53.3% | 40.0% | HDRS |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [57] Malone, 2009, Deep brain stimulation of the ventral capsule/ventral striatum for treatment-resistant depression, Biol Psychiat source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
In the Milett et al 2014 open-label study of four patients with treatment-resistant depression, ventral capsule/ventral striatum deep brain stimulation yielded a 25.0% remission rate at 14 months, measured by HDRS.
“| | Milett et al | 2014 Open label | N = 4 | 14 | 75.0% | 25.0% | HDRS |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [60] Millet, 2014, Limbic versus cognitive target for deep brain stimulation in treatment-resistant depression: accumbens more promising than caudate, Eur Neuropsychopharmacol source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
In the Bergfeld et al 2016 double-blind study of 25 patients with treatment-resistant depression, ventral capsule/ventral striatum deep brain stimulation yielded a 40.0% response rate at 13 months, measured by HDRS.
“| | Bergfeld et al | 2016 Double blind N = 25 | 13 | 40.0% | 20.0% | HDRS | |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [9] Bergfeld, 2016, Deep brain stimulation of the ventral anterior limb of the internal capsule for treatment-resistant depression: a randomized clinical trial, JAMA Psychiat source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
In the Bewernick et al 2012 open-label study of 11 patients with treatment-resistant depression, ventral capsule/ventral striatum deep brain stimulation yielded a 45.5% remission rate at 24 months, measured by HDRS.
“| | Bewernick et al | 2012 Open label | N = 11 | 24 | 48.4% | 45.5% | HDRS |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [59] Bewernick, 2012, Long-term effects of nucleus accumbens deep brain stimulation in treatment-resistant depression: evidence for sustained efficacy, Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
In the Van der Wal et al 2020 open-label study of 18 patients with treatment-resistant depression, ventral capsule/ventral striatum deep brain stimulation yielded a 27.8% remission rate at 24 months, measured by HDRS.
“| | Van der Wal et al | 2020 Open label | N = 18 | 24 | 44.4% | 27.8% | HDRS |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [62] van der Wal, 2020, Long-term deep brain stimulation of the ventral anterior limb of the internal capsule for treatment-resistant depression, J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
In the Van der Wal et al 2020 open-label study of 18 patients with treatment-resistant depression, ventral capsule/ventral striatum deep brain stimulation yielded a 44.4% response rate at 24 months, measured by HDRS.
“| | Van der Wal et al | 2020 Open label | N = 18 | 24 | 44.4% | 27.8% | HDRS |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [62] van der Wal, 2020, Long-term deep brain stimulation of the ventral anterior limb of the internal capsule for treatment-resistant depression, J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
In the Bergfeld et al 2016 double-blind study of 25 patients with treatment-resistant depression, ventral capsule/ventral striatum deep brain stimulation yielded a 20.0% remission rate at 13 months, measured by HDRS.
“| | Bergfeld et al | 2016 Double blind N = 25 | 13 | 40.0% | 20.0% | HDRS | |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [9] Bergfeld, 2016, Deep brain stimulation of the ventral anterior limb of the internal capsule for treatment-resistant depression: a randomized clinical trial, JAMA Psychiat source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
In the Milett et al 2014 open-label study of four patients with treatment-resistant depression, ventral capsule/ventral striatum deep brain stimulation yielded a 75.0% response rate at 14 months, measured by HDRS.
“| | Milett et al | 2014 Open label | N = 4 | 14 | 75.0% | 25.0% | HDRS |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [60] Millet, 2014, Limbic versus cognitive target for deep brain stimulation in treatment-resistant depression: accumbens more promising than caudate, Eur Neuropsychopharmacol source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
In the Dougherty et al 2015 double-blind study of 30 patients with treatment-resistant depression, ventral capsule/ventral striatum deep brain stimulation yielded a 23.3% remission rate at 24 months, measured by MADRS.
“| | Dougherty et al | 2015 Double blind N = 30 | 24 | 23.3% | 23.3% | MADRS | |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [61] Dougherty, 2015, A Randomized sham-controlled trial of deep brain stimulation of the ventral capsule/ventral striatum for chronic treatment-resistant depression, Biol Psychiat source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
In the Dougherty et al 2015 double-blind study of 30 patients with treatment-resistant depression, ventral capsule/ventral striatum deep brain stimulation yielded a 23.3% response rate at 24 months, measured by MADRS.
“| | Dougherty et al | 2015 Double blind N = 30 | 24 | 23.3% | 23.3% | MADRS | |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [61] Dougherty, 2015, A Randomized sham-controlled trial of deep brain stimulation of the ventral capsule/ventral striatum for chronic treatment-resistant depression, Biol Psychiat source
Not checked in the free run.
- May combine two claims. 62
- The quote only partly states this claim. 5
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 16
May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
FindingcitationOpen-label trials of subcallosal cingulate cortex DBS for treatment-resistant depression have shown response rates around 55-66% and remission rates around 33-40% at 6-12 months.
“The first open-label trial of DBS for TRD conducted by Mayberg et al. demonstrated its safety and efficacy, with a response rate (RS) at 6 months of 66% and remission (RM) rate of 33% [5].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [5] Mayberg, 2005, Deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression, Neuron source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [23] Lozano, 2008, Subcallosal cingulate gyrus deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression, Biol Psychiatry source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [24] Kennedy, 2011, Deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression: follow-up after 3 to 6 years, Am J Psychiatry source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenResponse rates to DBS for treatment-resistant depression vary greatly between patients and between studies, and often require extensive trial-and-error optimization of stimulation parameters.
“However, response rates vary greatly between patients and between studies and often require extensive trial-and-error optimizations of stimulation parameters.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFollowing subcallosal cingulate cortex DBS, there have been 12 suicide attempts and 6 suicides.
“Following SCC DBS there have been 12 suicide attempts, and 6 suicides.(Table 2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationThe average length of the current depressive episode for patients in the BROADEN trial was 12 years, almost double the average of previous published studies.
“Notably, the average length of the current depressive episode for these patients was 12 years, almost double the average of previous published studies”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [28] Holtzheimer, 2017, Subcallosal cingulate deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression: a multisite, randomised, sham-controlled trial, Lancet Psychiatry source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataFollowing ventral capsule/ventral striatum DBS, there have been 11 suicide attempts and 3 suicides.
“Following VC/VS DBS there have been 11 suicide attempts and 3 suicides (Table 2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenThe necessary and sufficient white matter bundles within the ventral anterior limb of the internal capsule to achieve predictable good outcomes have yet to be defined.
“The necessary and sufficient white matter bundles within the vALIC to achieve predictable good outcomes have yet to be defined.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationAt last follow-up, six of seven patients preferred VC/VS stimulation over ITP stimulation, and 66.7% of these were responders.
“However, at last follow up, six out of seven patients preferred VC/VS stimulation over ITP stimulation with 66.7% of these responding to simulation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [76] Raymaekers, 2017, Deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant major depressive disorder: a comparison of two targets and long-term follow-up, Transl Psychiatry source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataAmong 8 patients receiving ITP stimulation, 47 adverse events and no suicide attempts or suicides have been reported.
“In the 8 patients receiving ITP stimulation, 47 adverse events and no suicide attempts or suicides have been reported (Table 2) (Fig. 6).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenSubstantial relapses after many years of sustained wellness are usually observed during unintended discontinuation.
“Though substantial relapses after many years of sustained wellness are usually observed during unintended discontinuation”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationIn a case study, MFB stimulation improved depressive symptoms, but blurred vision could not be reduced by changing stimulation parameters, leading to selection of a new target.
“Although depressive symptoms improved following stimulation, blurred vision could not be attenuated with changes in stimulation parameters and ultimately led to the selection of a new target.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [68] Blomstedt, 2017, Deep brain stimulation in the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis and medial forebrain bundle in a patient with major depressive disorder and anorexia nervosa, Clin Case Rep source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationAfter at least 5 months of VC/VS stimulation, 6 of 7 patients were responders and 5 were in remission, with response 85% and remission 71%.
“After at least 5 months VC/VS stimulation 6 out of 7 patients were responders, and 5 were in remission (RS: 85%, RM: 71%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [76] Raymaekers, 2017, Deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant major depressive disorder: a comparison of two targets and long-term follow-up, Transl Psychiatry source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataFrequent stimulation-related adverse events in MFB DBS include vision or eye movement disorder and blurred vision, which account for most listed adverse events.
“Frequent stimulation-related adverse events include vision/eye movement disorder and blurred vision-accounting for the majority of listed AEs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationA case study of combined VC/VS and SCC DBS reported remission until 75 weeks of follow-up and differential response profiles.
“A case study of combined VC/VS and SCC DBS reports remission until 75 weeks follow-up of combined stimulation and differential response-profiles.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [77] Sheth S.A. BKR, Metzger B., Allawala A., Pirtle V., Adkinson, J.A. MJ, Mathura R.K., Oswalt D., Tsolaki E., Xiao J., Noecker A., Strutt A.M., Cohn J.F., McIntyre C.C., Mathew S.J., Borton D., Goodman W. & Pouratian N. Deep brain stimulation for depression informed by intracranial recordings. Biol Psychiatry. 2021. source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenAfter MFB DBS, one attempted suicide and no completed suicides have been reported.
“There has been one attempted and no completed suicides reported following MFB DBS.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationIn that 12-month randomized trial, significant response and remission rates were observed at 1 year, with response 100% and remission 50%.
“show significant response and remission rates at 1 year (RS: 100%, RM: 50%)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [72] Coenen, 2019, Superolateral medial forebrain bundle deep brain stimulation in major depression: a gateway trial, Neuropsychopharmacology source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationAfter at least 3 months of ITP stimulation, 4 of 7 patients were responders and 1 was in remission, with response 57% and remission 14%.
“After at least 3-month ITP stimulation, 4 out of 7 patients were responders, and 1 was in remission (RS: 57%, RM: 14%).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [76] Raymaekers, 2017, Deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant major depressive disorder: a comparison of two targets and long-term follow-up, Transl Psychiatry source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
FindingcitationSCC stimulation reduced mental noise and produced calmness and attention, while VC/VS stimulation produced energy and motivation.
“SCC stimulation reduced “mental noise” and produced calmness and attention and VC/VS stimulation produced energy and motivation [77].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [77] Sheth S.A. BKR, Metzger B., Allawala A., Pirtle V., Adkinson, J.A. MJ, Mathura R.K., Oswalt D., Tsolaki E., Xiao J., Noecker A., Strutt A.M., Cohn J.F., McIntyre C.C., Mathew S.J., Borton D., Goodman W. & Pouratian N. Deep brain stimulation for depression informed by intracranial recordings. Biol Psychiatry. 2021. source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationIn the open-label phase of the Fenoy et al. study, at 1 year the response rate was 66% and the remission rate was 50%.
“at 1 year (RS: 66%, RM: 50%)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [70] Fenoy, 2016, Deep brain stimulation of the medial forebrain bundle: Distinctive responses in resistant depression, J Affect Disord source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [71] Fenoy, 2018, A longitudinal study on deep brain stimulation of the medial forebrain bundle for treatment-resistant depression, Transl Psychiatry source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenPsychiatric adverse events associated with stimulation are not fully delineated and appear variable across targets.
“psychiatric adverse events associated with stimulation are not yet fully delineated and appear variable across targets.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingcitationAlternative measures are under study, such as scales for symptom subdimensions or analysis of movements, speech, or facial expression.
“alternative measures are under study for example scales for symptom subdimensions or analysis of movements, speech, or facial expression [82][83][84].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [82] Jiang, 2021, Classifying major depressive disorder and response to deep brain stimulation over time by analyzing facial expressions, IEEE Trans Biomed Eng source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [83] Scangos, 2021, State-dependent responses to intracranial brain stimulation in a patient with depression, Nat Med source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [84] McCall, 2020, Analyzing non-verbal behavior throughout recovery in a sample of depressed patients receiving deep brain stimulation, Neurol Psychiatry Brain Res source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationIn one SCC DBS study, only activation of the cingulum correlated with response, though only half of participants were responders and inclusion of other fibers was unclear.
“In one study of SCC DBS only activation of the cingulum correlated with response though only half of this trial's participants were responders and it is unclear to what extent the forceps minor, uncinate fasciculus or subcortical fibers were fully included in the surgical target [30].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [30] Clark, 2020, Tract-based analysis of target engagement by subcallosal cingulate deep brain stimulation for treatment resistant depression, Brain Stimul source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationSymptoms return in the order of weeks when SCC DBS is turned off, whereas symptoms return in the order of days when VC/VS DBS is turned off.
“It appears that symptoms return in the order of weeks when SCC DBS is turned off [26], whereas symptoms return on the order of days when VC/VS DBS is turned off [9].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [26] Holtzheimer, 2012, Subcallosal cingulate deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant unipolar and bipolar depression, Arch Gen Psychiatry source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [9] Bergfeld, 2016, Deep brain stimulation of the ventral anterior limb of the internal capsule for treatment-resistant depression: a randomized clinical trial, JAMA Psychiat source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThis patient population has an average disease duration lasting many years, with a variety of associated secondary problems.
“This patient population has an average disease duration lasting many years, with a variety of associated secondary problems.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenIn psychiatric disorders, several groups are using electrophysiology to detect mood signals to select stimulation target and parameters.
“In psychiatric disorders, there are several groups that are utilizing electrophysiology to detect mood signals to select stimulation target and parameters.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationResponsive VC/VS stimulation triggered by amygdala gamma increases resulted in over 400 daily biomarker detections and acute and sustained remission of depressive symptoms.
“This strategy resulted in over 400 daily depressive biomarker detections triggering 6-s stimulations, and acute and sustained remission of depressive symptoms.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [109] Scangos, 2021, Closed-loop neuromodulation in an individual with treatment-resistant depression, Nat Med source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationThe sweet spot is in the high-frequency range of 100-150 Hz, which is also supported by animal studies.
“the sweet spot is in the high-frequency range (100-150 Hz) [103], which is also supported by animal studies [104,105].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [103] Rudebeck PH, Rich EL, Mayberg HS. From bed to bench side: reverse translation to optimize neuromodulation for mood disorders. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2019. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [104] Hamani, 2010, Effects of different stimulation parameters on the antidepressant-like response of medial prefrontal cortex deep brain stimulation in rats, J Psychiatr Res source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [105] Lim LW, Prickaerts J, Huguet G, Kadar E, Hartung H, Sharp T, et al. Electrical stimulation alleviates depressive-like behaviors of rats: investigation of brain targets and potential mechanisms. Trans Psychiatry. 2015;5(3):e535-e. source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenFor now, there are no fast behavioral effects with DBS at these targets as there are for tremor in Parkinson's disease.
“for now, there are not fast behavioral effects with DBS at these targets as there are for tremor in PD.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationIn the BROADEN trial, improvement between 12 and 24 months relative to the first 12 months was attributable to stimulation changes (active contacts and current) that were not permissible under study protocol in the first 12 months.
“improvement between 12 and 24 months relative to the first 12 months was attributable to stimulation changes-changes in active contacts and current-which were not permissible under study protocol in the first 12 months.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [28] Holtzheimer, 2017, Subcallosal cingulate deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression: a multisite, randomised, sham-controlled trial, Lancet Psychiatry source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe BROADEN trial of subcallosal cingulate cortex DBS for treatment-resistant depression showed no significant difference between active and sham groups at the 6-month primary endpoint, with response rates of 20% vs 17%.
“Results at the 6-month primary endpoint showed no significant difference between active and sham groups with a low response rate in both groups (20% vs 17%).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [28] Holtzheimer, 2017, Subcallosal cingulate deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression: a multisite, randomised, sham-controlled trial, Lancet Psychiatry source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationActivity in the subcallosal cingulate cortex increases with provocation of sad mood and decreases in response to antidepressant interventions.
“Activity in this region increases with the provocation of sad mood [16] and decreases in response to antidepressant interventions [16][17][18][19][20].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [16] Mayberg, 1999, Reciprocal limbic-cortical function and negative mood: converging PET findings in depression and normal sadness, Am J Psychiatry source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [17] Mayberg, 2009, Targeted electrode-based modulation of neural circuits for depression, J Clin Investig source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [18] Siegle, 2006, Use of FMRI to predict recovery from unipolar depression with cognitive behavior therapy, Am J Psychiatry source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe RECLAIM trial of ventral capsule/ventral striatum DBS for treatment-resistant depression did not demonstrate a significant difference between active and sham groups at the 4-month primary endpoint, resulting in early termination for futility (N = 30/200).
“Results from the primary endpoint did not demonstrate a significant difference between active and sham groups, resulting in an early termination of the study for futility (N = 30/200).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [61] Dougherty, 2015, A Randomized sham-controlled trial of deep brain stimulation of the ventral capsule/ventral striatum for chronic treatment-resistant depression, Biol Psychiat source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationDBS for obsessive-compulsive disorder showed significant benefit for OCD symptoms with an associated improvement in mood.
“DBS for OCD showed significant benefit for OCD symptoms with an associated improvement in mood [49][50][51].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [49] Goodman, 2010, Deep brain stimulation for intractable obsessive compulsive disorder: pilot study using a blinded, staggered-onset design, Biol Psychiatry source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [50] Greenberg, 2010, Deep brain stimulation of the ventral internal capsule/ventral striatum for obsessive-compulsive disorder: worldwide experience, Mol Psychiatry source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [51] Nuttin, 2003, Electrical stimulation of the anterior limbs of the internal capsules in patients with severe obsessive-compulsive disorder: anecdotal reports, Neurosurg Clin N Am source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThe clear and well-characterized subcortical lateral habenula connections from optogenetic and functional imaging studies are of limited use for precision targeting of selective LHb white matter connections in human DBS trials, which is technically confounded by the small size of this nucleus relative to the large volume of tissue activated by conventional DBS.
“The clear and well-characterized subcortical LHb connections from optogenetic and functional imaging studies [39] are of limited use for precision targeting of selective LHb white matter connections in human DBS trials which is technically confounded by the small size of this nucleus relative to the large volume of tissue activated by conventional DBS.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [39] Yang, 2018, Lateral habenula in the pathophysiology of depression, Curr Opin Neurobiol source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationVentral capsule/ventral striatum DBS was first developed for obsessive-compulsive disorder, given positive capsulotomy outcomes for these patients.
“Ventral capsule/ventral striatum (VC/VS) DBS was first developed for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), given positive capsulotomy outcomes for these patients [48].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [48] Abelson, 2005, Deep brain stimulation for refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder, Biol Psychiatry source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationIn the Bergfeld et al. study, most patients had to be prematurely crossed over due to significantly increased depressive symptoms typically occurring within one day of crossover, raising ethical concerns around discontinuation-trials in DBS for treatment-resistant depression.
“Of note, most patients had to be prematurely crossed over due to significantly increased depressive symptoms typically occurring within one day of crossover, raising ethical concerns around discontinuation-trials in DBS for TRD.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [9] Bergfeld, 2016, Deep brain stimulation of the ventral anterior limb of the internal capsule for treatment-resistant depression: a randomized clinical trial, JAMA Psychiat source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn a subsequent retrospective analysis of an independent cohort of 19 treatment-resistant depression patients, only activation of the cingulum correlated with response at 6 months, while activation of the forceps minor negatively correlated to response.
“In this group of patients with a lower response rate than the original study (RS: 47.4% vs 81.9%),only activation of one of the four bundles, the cingulum, correlated with response at 6 months, while activation of the forceps minor negatively correlated to response.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [30] Clark, 2020, Tract-based analysis of target engagement by subcallosal cingulate deep brain stimulation for treatment resistant depression, Brain Stimul source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn a recent study of lateral habenula DBS in 6 patients with bipolar depression and 1 with unipolar depression, 3 patients were responders and 1 remitted (RS: 42.9%, RM: 14.3%).
“Recently, LHb DBS was investigated in 6 patients with bipolar depression and 1 patient with unipolar depression [47].Three patients were responders and 1 patient remitted (RS: 42.9%, RM: 14.3%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [47] Zhang C, Zhang Y, Luo H, Xu X, Yuan T-f, Li D, et al. Bilateral Habenula deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression: clinical findings and electrophysiological features. Translational Psychiatry. 2022;12(1):52. source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAnother retrospective study of 17 treatment-resistant depression patients found activation of the forceps minor and uncinate fascicle but not cingulate bundle and no association between activated bundles and response, but this study did not apply tractography-based targeting.
“Another retrospective study of 17 TRD patients (RS: 58.9%, RM: 35.5%) found activation of the forceps minor and uncinate fascicle but not cingulate bundle and no association between activated bundles and response but this study did not apply tractography-based targeting [31].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [31] Aibar-Duran, 2022, Long-term results of deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression: outcome analysis and correlation with lead position and electrical parameters, Neurosurgery source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe ventral capsule/ventral striatum is a central hub in the reward circuitry with dopaminergic inputs from the ventral tegmental area, and serving as a relay between prefrontal cortex (OFC, vmPFC, ACC), ventral striatum and the amygdala and hippocampus.
“The VC/VS is a central hub in the reward circuitry with dopaminergic inputs from the ventral tegmental area (VTA), and serving as a relay between prefrontal cortex (OFC, vmPFC, ACC), ventral striatum and the amygdala and hippocampus [55,56] (Fig. 4).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe inferior thalamic peduncle connects the dorsomedial thalamus with the orbitofrontal cortex, and both regions show hypermetabolism in depressed patients.
“The inferior thalamic peduncle (ITP) connects the dorsomedial thalamus with the orbitofrontal cortex, which both show hypermetabolism in depressed patients [73].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [73] Velasco F, Velasco M, Jimenez F, Velasco AL, Salin-Pascual R. Neurobiological background for performing surgical intervention in the inferior thalamic peduncle for treatment of major depression disorders. Neurosurgery. 2005;57(3):439–48; discussion -48. source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThese patients, in addition to another cohort (N = 21), were followed for a maximum of 5 years and showed significant response and remission rates at 6 months (N = 21, RS: 42.8%, RM: 38.1%), 2 years (N = 17, RS: 64.7%, RM: 47.1%), and 5 years (N = 11, RS: 72.27%, RM: 72.7%).
“These patients, in addition to another cohort (N = 21), were followed for a maximum of 5 years and showed significant response and remission rates at 6 months (N = 21, RS: 42.8%, RM: 38.1%), 2 years (N = 17, RS: 64.7%, RM: 47.1%), and 5 years (N = 11, RS: 72.27%, RM: 72.7%) [67].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [67] Bewernick, 2018, Deep brain stimulation of the supero-lateral branch of the medial forebrain bundle does not lead to changes in personality in patients suffering from severe depression, Psychol Med source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationPlacebo rates are high in medication trials for depression.
“Though placebo rates are high in medication trials for depression [78]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [78] Jakovljevic, 2014, The placebo-nocebo response: controversies and challenges from clinical and research perspective, Eur Neuropsychopharmacol source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationITP fibers continue rostrally through the ventral limb of the internal capsule and have modulatory connections to the DLPFC, OFC, ventromedial striatum, and intralaminar thalamus.
“ITP fibers continue rostrally through the ventral limb of the internal capsule, with modulatory connections to the DLPFC, OFC, ventromedial striatum, and intralaminar thalamus [74].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [74] Kopell, 2008, Anatomy and physiology of the basal ganglia: implications for DBS in psychiatry, Neurosci Biobehav Rev source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAvailable evidence suggests that DBS for treatment-resistant depression is an effective, safe, and well-tolerated experimental therapeutic option.
“Available evidence suggests that DBS for TRD is an effective, safe, and well-tolerated experimental therapeutic option for TRD.”
- Also stated in: § Conclusion · plain
“DBS is an effective, safe, and well-tolerated therapeutic option for TRD.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § Conclusion · plain
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAll therapeutic DBS targets reviewed have comparable effectiveness for treating depression, although no head-to-head studies exist.
“All therapeutic DBS targets reviewed here have comparable effectiveness for treating depression though there are no head-to-head studies to date.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe reviewed DBS studies show a suicide attempt rate of 6.7%, suggesting that DBS for treatment-resistant depression does not increase suicide risk.
“The DBS studies reviewed here demonstrate a suicide attempt rate of 6.7%, suggesting that DBS for TRD does not increase suicide risk.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningDiscontinuation of stimulation is generally associated with measurable relapse, raising ethical concerns and potential non-compliance at a critical trial stage.
“Discontinuation of stimulation is nonetheless generally associated with measurable relapse, raising ethical concerns and the potential for patients' non-compliance at this critical stage of a clinical trial.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisereasoningThe HRDS and MADRS assess depressive symptom severity but cannot track symptoms once a patient is out of episode, when distinguishing relapse from transient mood instability matters.
“the HRDS and MADRS are designed to assess severity of depressive symptoms but cannot be used for tracking symptoms once someone is out of episode when it is important to discriminate depression relapse from transient mood instability.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The HRDS and MADRS cannot be used to track symptoms once a patient is out of episode.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationVC/VS targets structurally and functionally connect to the MFB and partially to the SCC, but the SCC has selective fibers not directly connected to VC/VS or NAc.
“DBS targets in the VC/VS region structurally and functionally connect to the MFB and partially to the SCC [91], but the SCC has selective fibers that are not directly connected to VC/VS or NAc [92,93].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [91] Salgado, 2015, The nucleus accumbens: a comprehensive review, Stereotact Funct Neurosurg source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [92] Gutman, 2009, A tractography analysis of two deep brain stimulation white matter targets for depression, Biol Psychiatry source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [93] Zhu, 2021, A connectomic analysis of deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression, Brain Stimul source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningTractography-based surgical planning across DBS targets appears to improve outcomes but has not directly informed understanding of DBS mechanisms.
“While tractography-based surgical planning across different DBS targets appears to improve outcomes, it has not directly informed understanding of DBS mechanisms.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisereasoningThe HRDS and MADRS were designed to survey all depression symptoms globally, whereas DBS is circuit-selective and likely acts on circuit-specific symptom profiles.
“these scales were designed to globally survey all symptoms of depression while DBS is by definition a circuit-selective intervention likely acting on circuit-specific symptom profiles.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: DBS is by definition a circuit-selective intervention that likely acts on circuit-specific symptom profiles.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSCC DBS modulates NAc activity and NAc DBS modulates the SCC; both targets influence the brainstem, hypothalamus, amygdala, and OFC.
“Nevertheless, SCC DBS modulates activity in the NAc and, conversely, NAc DBS modulates the SCC, while other regions that are influenced via both targets include the brainstem, hypothalamus, amygdala, and OFC [94][95][96].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [94] Bewernick, 2010, Nucleus accumbens deep brain stimulation decreases ratings of depression and anxiety in treatment-resistant depression, Biol Psychiatry source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [95] Rauch, 2006, A functional neuroimaging investigation of deep brain stimulation in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder, J Neurosurg source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [96] Van Laere, 2006, Metabolic imaging of anterior capsular stimulation in refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder: a key role for the subgenual anterior cingulate and ventral striatum, J Nucl Med
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationGenerally, 30% of patients with treatment-resistant depression attempt suicide at least once in their lives.
“Generally, 30% of patients with TRD attempt suicide at least once in their lives [86].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [86] Bergfeld, 2018, Treatment-resistant depression and suicidality, J Affect Disord source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenTractography has limitations, including inability to convey current direction through a bundle, disambiguate cell-specific connections, identify network nodes beyond first-level monosynaptic connections, and lack of uniform tract identification methodology.
“Tractography has several limitations, including inability to con-vey information about the direction of current flow through a given bundle, inability to disambiguate cell-specific connections, inability to identify network nodes beyond first-level monosynaptic connections and lack of a uniform methodology to identify the tracts.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationNotable exceptions include prospective targeting of a predefined responder map of specific white matter fibers connected to the SCC and individual tractography identification of the medial forebrain bundle.
“Notable exceptions include prospective targeting of a predefined responder map of specific white matter fibers connected to the SCC [29], and the individual tractography identification of the medial forebrain bundle [72]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [29] Riva-Posse, 2018, A connectomic approach for subcallosal cingulate deep brain stimulation surgery: prospective targeting in treatment-resistant depression, Mol Psychiatry source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [72] Coenen, 2019, Superolateral medial forebrain bundle deep brain stimulation in major depression: a gateway trial, Neuropsychopharmacology source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenIn Parkinson's disease, it is more accepted that DBS selectively improves tremor and rigidity items of the MDS-UPDRS rather than freezing, gait, or apathy.
“In Parkinson's disease (PD), it is more accepted that DBS selectively improves tremor and rigidity items of the motor Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) rather than freezing, gait, or apathy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningIn the MFB target, tractography is necessary for implantation and there is no responder template.
“In this target, tractography is necessary for implantation, and there is no “responder” template.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisereasoningNAc or VC/VS stimulation does not affect the SCC monosynaptically because NAc connections go to the thalamus first and then back to frontal cortex via the ALIC.
“NAc or VC/VS stimulation does not affect the SCC monosynaptically as NAc connections go to the thalamus first and then back to frontal cortex via the ALIC.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenThe reviewed surgical risks of DBS for treatment-resistant depression are minimal and do not differ significantly from risks of DBS for movement disorders.
“The reviewed surgical risks of DBS for TRD are minimal and do not differ significantly from risks of DBS for movement disorders.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationDifferences between active and sham groups might not be observable until stimulation parameter optimization has been achieved, which can take up to 1 year after surgery in some targets.
“Our review suggests that differences between active and sham groups might not be observable until stimulation parameter optimization has been achieved, and that can take up to 1 year after surgery in some targets [9].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [9] Bergfeld, 2016, Deep brain stimulation of the ventral anterior limb of the internal capsule for treatment-resistant depression: a randomized clinical trial, JAMA Psychiat source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationvALIC DBS improved mood in primary OCD and was associated with enhanced striatal reward-processing and dopamine release, which may be important mechanisms for reversing anhedonia and lack of positive mood in major depression.
“DBS of the vALIC improved mood in patients with primary OCD and was associated with enhanced striatal reward-processing and dopamine release, which may be important mechanisms for the reversal of anhedonia and lack of positive mood in major depression [52,65,100,101].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 4 sources checked- cites [52] Figee, 2013, Deep brain stimulation restores frontostriatal network activity in obsessive-compulsive disorder, Nat Neurosci source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [65] Coenen, 2018, The anatomy of the human medial forebrain bundle: ventral tegmental area connections to reward-associated subcortical and frontal lobe regions, Neuroimage Clin source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [100] Denys, 2010, Deep brain stimulation of the nucleus accumbens for treatment-refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder, Arch Gen Psychiatry source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [101] Figee, 2014, Deep brain stimulation induces striatal dopamine release in obsessive-compulsive disorder, Biol Psychiatry source
Not checked in the free run.
The quote only partly states this claim.
PremisecitationIn the Keining et al 2013 open-label study of two patients with treatment-resistant depression, lateral habenula deep brain stimulation yielded a 100% remission rate, measured by HDRS.
“| | Keining et al | 2013 Open label | N = 2 | N/A | 100.0% | 100.0% | HDRS |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [46] Kiening, 2013, A new translational target for deep brain stimulation to treat depression, EMBO Mol Med source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationnone givenFor closed-loop stimulation in psychiatric disorders to become a reality, reliable and accessible biomarkers of depression in TRD patients with DBS must first be determined.
“For closed loop stimulation in psychiatric disorders to become a reality, reliable and accessible biomarkers of depression in TRD patients with DBS first have to be determined.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningWhite matter activation maps in DBS responders across targets will help determine the optimal antidepressant network for tractography-guided surgery.
“White matter activation maps in DBS responders across targets will help determining the optimal antidepressant network that can be used for tractography-guided surgery.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningProgress in the field may depend on developing novel outcome measurements that capture sustained circuit-selective symptom changes and on standardizing randomized placebo-controlled designs with initial open-label parameter optimization.
“Progress in the field may depend on the development of novel outcome measurements capturing the sustained circuit-selective symptom changes observed after DBS, and standardization of randomized placebo-controlled study designs including initial open-label parameter optimization.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThis case study does not demonstrate superiority of closed-loop VC/VS stimulation over classic VC/VS DBS or whether stimulation must be tailored to daily mood fluctuations versus prolonged depressive states.
“it does not yet demonstrate effective superiority compared to classic VC/VS DBS or whether stimulation needs to be tailored to biomarkers of daily mood fluctuations or more prolonged depressive states.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningMost trials kept medications stable during DBS because withdrawing TRD patients from treatments before experimental DBS is an ethical and safety challenge.
“Most trials have kept medications stable during the DBS as withdrawing TRD patients from treatments prior to experimental DBS is an ethical and safety challenge.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). The quote only partly states this claim.
Premiseown dataIn the Wang et al 2021 open-label study of one patient with treatment-resistant depression, lateral habenula deep brain stimulation yielded a 0% remission rate at 3 months, measured by HDRS.
“| | Wang et al | 2021 Open label | N = 1 | 3 | 100.0% | 0% | HDRS |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationComorbid psychiatric disorders may favor specific targets, such as comorbid OCD or OC symptoms favoring VC/VS and anorexia favoring SCC stimulation.
“Similarly, comorbid psychiatric disorders may favor the choice of specific targets in depression, i.e., comorbid OCD or significant OC symptoms may favor a VC/VS target, and depressed patients with anorexia may respond to SCC stimulation [102].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [102] Lipsman, 2017, Deep brain stimulation of the subcallosal cingulate for treatment-refractory anorexia nervosa: 1 year follow-up of an open-label trial, Lancet Psychiatry source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn the Sartorius et al 2010 case study of one patient with treatment-resistant depression, lateral habenula deep brain stimulation yielded a 100% remission rate at 14 months, measured by HDRS.
“| | Sartorius et al | 2010 Case study | N = 1 | 14 | 100.0% | 100.0% | HDRS |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [45] Sartorius, 2010, Remission of major depression under deep brain stimulation of the lateral habenula in a therapy-refractory patient, Biol Psychiatry source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Premiseown dataIn the Wang et al 2021 open-label study of one patient with treatment-resistant depression, lateral habenula deep brain stimulation yielded a 100% response rate at 3 months, measured by HDRS.
“| | Wang et al | 2021 Open label | N = 1 | 3 | 100.0% | 0% | HDRS |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningLonger pulse-widths were beneficial in some patients but caused more side effects, suggesting less specific stimulation delivery.
“Although longer pulse-widths were beneficial in some patients, this also caused more side effects suggesting a less specific stimulation delivery.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningA precision-stimulation strategy will likely produce faster and higher antidepressant responses that can be maintained or optimized by adjusting stimulation over time in a closed-loop or assisted-open-loop fashion informed by biomarkers of depressive states.
“This precision-stimulation strategy will likely result in faster and higher antidepressant responses that can be maintained or optimized by adjusting the stimulation over time in a closed-loop or assisted-open-loop fashion informed by biomarkers of depressive states.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
PremisecitationIn the Keining et al 2013 open-label study of two patients with treatment-resistant depression, lateral habenula deep brain stimulation yielded a 100% response rate, measured by HDRS.
“| | Keining et al | 2013 Open label | N = 2 | N/A | 100.0% | 100.0% | HDRS |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [46] Kiening, 2013, A new translational target for deep brain stimulation to treat depression, EMBO Mol Med source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationA case report suggests augmenting effects of SCC DBS with a monoamine oxidase inhibitor but not with other antidepressants.
“A casereport suggests augmenting effects of SCC DBS with monoamine oxidase inhibitor but not with other antidepressants [111].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [111] Hamani, 2012, Monoamine oxidase inhibitors potentiate the effects of deep brain stimulation, Am J Psychiatry source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationSeveral patients withdrawn from unhelpful medication at implant showed similar robust response to DBS, suggesting medication may not be required to achieve or augment DBS response.
“several patients that were withdrawn from unhelpful medication at the time of implant showed similar robust response to DBS [9], suggesting that medication may not be required to achieve or augment DBS response.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [9] Bergfeld, 2016, Deep brain stimulation of the ventral anterior limb of the internal capsule for treatment-resistant depression: a randomized clinical trial, JAMA Psychiat source
Not checked in the free run.
The authors state this as an assumption.
The reward circuitry is related to the anhedonia symptoms of major depressive disorder.
“This circuitry significantly overlaps with the reward-circuitry assumed to be related to the anhedonia symptoms of MDD.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The ventral capsule/ventral striatum target modulates the medial forebrain bundle in addition to the anterior thalamic radiation and other pathways.
“Notably, the VC/VS target is thought to modulate the MFB in addition to the anterior thalamic radiation (ATR) and other pathways discussed previously.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Treatment-resistant depression is characterized by a lack of mood variability.
“Since TRD is characterized by a lack of mood variability, successful treatment should restore this variability in patients.”
The paper relies on this without support.
DBS is by definition a circuit-selective intervention that likely acts on circuit-specific symptom profiles.
“while DBS is by definition a circuit-selective intervention likely acting on circuit-specific symptom profiles.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The HRDS and MADRS cannot be used to track symptoms once a patient is out of episode.
“the HRDS and MADRS are designed to assess severity of depressive symptoms but cannot be used for tracking symptoms once someone is out of episode”
The paper relies on this without support.
The treatment-resistant depression patient population has an average disease duration lasting many years.
“This patient population has an average disease duration lasting many years”
The paper relies on this without support.
The four lateral habenula deep brain stimulation studies pooled in the total row are sufficiently comparable in patient population, stimulation parameters, and outcome definitions to justify aggregating their response and remission rates.
“Total* | | | N = 11 | | 85.7% | 53.6% | |”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Closed-loop procedures allow an improved control of some neurological conditions such as epilepsy, and can also be used for better control of obsessive-compulsive disorders and depression.
“This procedures allow an improved control of some neurological conditions such as epilepsy (Ranjandish and Schmid, 2020; Farkhondeh Tale Navi et al., 2022), and can also be used for better control of obsessive-compulsive disorders and depression (Figee et al., 2022; Visser-Vandewalle et al., 2022).”
From Toward a personalized closed-loop stimulation of the visual cortex: Advances and challenges (2022) · cites this paper as Figee et al., 2022
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Bewernick two-year remission rate conflicts with Table 1
MajorThe text reports 9.1% remission at two years for this cohort, but Table 1 reports 45.5% for the 2012 Bewernick study at 24 months.
“at 2-year follow-ups (RS: 45.5%, RM: 9.1%) [58,59].”
“| | Bewernick et al | 2012 Open label | N = 11 | 24 | 48.4% | 45.5% | HDRS |”
Bewernick one-year remission rate conflicts with Table 1
MajorThe VC/VS discussion gives a 30% one-year remission rate for the 10-patient cohort, whereas Table 1 gives 50% for Bewernick et al. at 12 months.
“The second, single-site study demonstrated comparable benefits in 10 patients at 1-year (RS: 50%, RM: 30%)”
“| | Bewernick et al | 2009 Open label | N = 10 | 12 | 48.6% | 50.0% | HDRS |”
MFB trial one-year remission rates disagree
MajorThe text gives 50% remission at one year in the 16-patient randomized MFB trial, while the Table 1 entry for Coenen et al. reports 62.5% at 12 months.
“show significant response and remission rates at 1 year (RS: 100%, RM: 50%).”
“Coenen et al 2019 Double blind N = 16 12 100.0%62.5% MADRS”
Holtzheimer SCC outcomes conflict with Table 1
MajorFor the 2012 Holtzheimer study at 24 months, the text reports 100% response and 92% remission, but Table 1 reports 58% response and 11% remission.
“Results from the open-label phase support results from previous studies, demonstrating significant response and remission rates at 2 years (RS: 100%, RM: 92%).”
“| | Holtzheimer et al 2012 Single blind N = 17 | 24 | 58.0% | 11.0% | HDRS | | |”
Original SCC cohort has two reported sizes
MinorThe text says the original Mayberg cohort had six patients, while Table 1 lists five for the same study.
“This original cohort (N = 6) was expanded by Lozano and colleagues (N = 20)”
“| | Mayberg et al | 2005 Open label | N = 5 | 6 | 66.0% | 33.0% | HDRS |”
RECLAIM two-year remission rate differs from Table 1
MinorThe text reports 20% remission at two years, while Table 1 lists 23.3% remission for the Dougherty study at 24 months.
“2 years (RS: 23.3%, RM: 20%).”
“| | Dougherty et al | 2015 Double blind N = 30 | 24 | 23.3% | 23.3% | MADRS | |”
Claim of no head-to-head studies contradicts reviewed comparison
MinorThe discussion says there are no head-to-head studies, but the paper describes a seven-patient study directly comparing VC/VS and ITP stimulation.
“All therapeutic DBS targets reviewed here have comparable effectiveness for treating depression though there are no head-to-head studies to date.”
“In a study comparing Fig. 5 MFB stimulation location (left panel) and tractography of connections from the target (right panel) VC/VS stimulation to ITP stimulation in 7 TRD patients, Raymaekers et al. [76] fail to demonstrate significant difference between targets.”
Cites
Hamilton, M. (1960) · Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp.23.1.56 · Cited by 32,817 · cited 5× · see citing works
“The primary outcome measure in all but one [13] reviewed study was one of the following: HDRS-17, HDRS24, HDRS-28, and MADRS [14, 15].”
BackgroundInfluentialA new depression scale designed to be sensitive to change
Montgomery, S. A., & Åsberg, M. (1979) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.134.4.382 · Cited by 13,962 · see citing works
Rush, A. J., Trivedi, M. H., Wisniewski, S. R., Nierenberg, A. A., Stewart, J. W., Warden, D., Niederehe, G., Thase, M. E., Lavori, P. W., Lebowitz, B. D., et al. (2006) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.2006.163.11.1905 · Cited by 5,643 · cited 1× · see citing works
“While there are many treatments currently available for MDD, it is estimated that 10 to 30% of patients are refractory to standard interventions [3, 4].”
BackgroundDeep Brain Stimulation for Treatment-Resistant Depression
Mayberg, H. S., Lozano, A. M., Voon, V., McNeely, H. E., Seminowicz, D., Hamani, C., Schwalb, J. M., & Kennedy, S. H. (2005) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2005.02.014 · Cited by 4,059 · see citing works
Self-citationBardo, M. T., & Hammer, R. P. (1991) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/0306-4522(91)90226-e · Cited by 3,229 · see citing works
Mayberg, H. S., Liotti, M., Brannan, S. K., McGinnis, S., Mahurin, R. K., Jerabek, P. A., Silva, J. A., Tekell, J. L., Martin, C. C., Lancaster, J. L., et al. (1999) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.156.5.675 · Cited by 2,416 · see citing works
Self-citationEpidemiology of Adult <i>DSM-5</i> Major Depressive Disorder and Its Specifiers in the United States
Hasin, D. S., Sarvet, A. L., Meyers, J. L., Saha, T. D., Ruan, W. J., Stohl, M., & Grant, B. F. (2018) · JAMA Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.4602 · Cited by 1,737 · see citing works
Deep Brain Stimulation to Reward Circuitry Alleviates Anhedonia in Refractory Major Depression
Schlaepfer, T. E., Cohen, M. X., Frick, C., Kosel, M., Brodesser, D., Axmacher, N., Joe, A. Y., Kreft, M., Lenartz, D., & Sturm, V. (2008) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/sj.npp.1301408 · Cited by 1,027 · see citing works
Subcallosal cingulate gyrus deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression
Lozano, A. M., Mayberg, H. S., Giacobbe, P., Hamani, C., Craddock, R. C., & Kennedy, S. H. (2008) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2008.05.034 · Cited by 1,024 · see citing works
Self-citationTechnology of deep brain stimulation: current status and future directions
Krauss, J. K., Lipsman, N., Aziz, T. Z., Boutet, A., Brown, P., Chang, J. W., Davidson, B., Grill, W. M., Hariz, M. I., Horn, A., et al. (2020) · Nature Reviews Neurology · doi:10.1038/s41582-020-00426-z · Cited by 930 · see citing works
Deep Brain Stimulation of the Ventral Capsule/Ventral Striatum for Treatment-Resistant Depression
Malone, D. A., Dougherty, D. D., Rezai, A. R., Carpenter, L. L., Friehs, G. M., Eskandar, E. N., Rauch, S. L., Rasmussen, S. A., Machado, A. G., Kubu, C. S., et al. (2009) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2008.08.029 · Cited by 897 · see citing works
Greenberg, B. D., Gabriels, L. A., Malone, D. A., Rezai, A. R., Friehs, G. M., Okun, M. S., Shapira, N. A., Foote, K. D., Cosyns, P. R., Kubu, C. S., et al. (2010) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/mp.2008.55 · Cited by 867 · see citing works
Bewernick, B. H., Hurlemann, R., Matusch, A., Kayser, S., Grubert, C., Hadrysiewicz, B., Axmacher, N., Lemke, M., Cooper-Mahkorn, D., Cohen, M. X., et al. (2010) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.09.013 · Cited by 865 · see citing works
Denys, D., Mantione, M., Figee, M., van den Munckhof, P., Koerselman, F., Westenberg, H., Bosch, A., & Schuurman, R. (2010) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.122 · Cited by 763 · see citing works
Self-citationLead-DBS v2: Towards a comprehensive pipeline for deep brain stimulation imaging
Horn, A., Li, N., Dembek, T. A., Kappel, A., Boulay, C., Ewert, S., Tietze, A., Husch, A., Perera, T., Neumann, W.-J., et al. (2019) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.08.068 · Cited by 739 · see citing works
Lead-DBS: A toolbox for deep brain stimulation electrode localizations and visualizations
Horn, A., & Kühn, A. A. (2014) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.12.002 · Cited by 670 · see citing works
Sartorius, A., Kiening, K. L., Kirsch, P., von Gall, C. C., Haberkorn, U., Unterberg, A. W., Henn, F. A., & Meyer-Lindenberg, A. (2010) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.08.027 · Cited by 611 · see citing works
Subcallosal Cingulate Deep Brain Stimulation for Treatment-Resistant Unipolar and Bipolar Depression
Holtzheimer, P. E. (2012) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.1456 · Cited by 608 · see citing works
Holtzheimer, P. E., Husain, M. M., Lisanby, S. H., Taylor, S. F., Whitworth, L. A., McClintock, S., Slavin, K. V., Berman, J., McKhann, G. M., Patil, P. G., et al. (2017) · The Lancet Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(17)30371-1 · Cited by 577 · see citing works
Self-citationAssessing anhedonia in depression: potentials and pitfalls
Rizvi, S. J., Pizzagalli, D. A., Sproule, B. A., & Kennedy, S. H. (2016) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.03.004 · Cited by 571 · see citing works
Rapid effects of deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant major depression
Schlaepfer, T. E., Bewernick, B. H., Kayser, S., Mädler, B., & Coenen, V. A. (2013) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2013.01.034 · Cited by 563 · see citing works
Dougherty, D. D., Rezai, A. R., Carpenter, L. L., Howland, R. H., Bhati, M. T., O’Reardon, J. P., Eskandar, E. N., Baltuch, G. H., Machado, A. D., Kondziolka, D., et al. (2015) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2014.11.023 · Cited by 558 · see citing works
Targeted electrode-based modulation of neural circuits for depression.
Mayberg, H. S. (2009) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci38454 · Cited by 542 · see citing works
Self-citationClosed-loop neuromodulation in an individual with treatment-resistant depression
Scangos, K. W., Khambhati, A. N., Daly, P. M., Makhoul, G. S., Sugrue, L. P., Zamanian, H., Liu, T. X., Rao, V. R., Sellers, K. K., Dawes, H. E., et al. (2021) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-021-01480-w · Cited by 535 · see citing works
Deep brain stimulation for refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder
Abelson, J. L., Curtis, G. C., Sagher, O., Albucher, R. C., Harrigan, M., Taylor, S. F., Martis, B., & Giordani, B. (2005) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2004.11.042 · Cited by 522 · see citing works
NTU-90: A high angular resolution brain atlas constructed by q-space diffeomorphic reconstruction
Yeh, F.-C. F., & Tseng, W. I. (2011) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.06.021 · Cited by 509 · see citing works
Use of fMRI to Predict Recovery From Unipolar Depression With Cognitive Behavior Therapy
Siegle, G. J., Carter, C. S., & Thase, M. E. (2006) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.2006.163.4.735 · Cited by 495 · see citing works
The nucleus accumbens: a comprehensive review
Salgado, S., & Kaplitt, M. G. (2015) · Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery · doi:10.1159/000368279 · Cited by 489 · see citing works
Deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression: follow-up after 3 to 6 years
Kennedy, S. H., Giacobbe, P., Rizvi, S. J., Placenza, F. M., Nishikawa, Y., Mayberg, H. S., & Lozano, A. M. (2011) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2010.10081187 · Cited by 481 · see citing works
Self-citationThe afferent and efferent connections of the ventromedial thalamic nucleus in the rat
Herkenham, M. (1979) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.901830304 · Cited by 477 · see citing works
Deep brain stimulation restores frontostriatal network activity in obsessive-compulsive disorder
Figee, M., Luigjes, J., Smolders, R., Valencia-Alfonso, C.-E., van Wingen, G., de Kwaasteniet, B., Mantione, M., Ooms, P., de Koning, P., Vulink, N., et al. (2013) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.3344 · Cited by 466 · see citing works
Self-citationRiva-Posse, P., Choi, K. S., Holtzheimer, P. E., McIntyre, C. C., Gross, R. E., Chaturvedi, A., Crowell, A. L., Garlow, S. J., Rajendra, J. K., & Mayberg, H. S. (2014) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2014.03.029 · Cited by 460 · see citing works
Self-citationRiva-Posse, P., Choi, K. S., Holtzheimer, P. E., Crowell, A. L., Garlow, S. J., Rajendra, J. K., McIntyre, C. C., Gross, R. E., & Mayberg, H. S. (2018) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/mp.2017.59 · Cited by 441 · see citing works
Self-citationBewernick, B. H., Kayser, S., Sturm, V., & Schlaepfer, T. E. (2012) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/npp.2012.44 · Cited by 371 · see citing works
Goodman, W. K., Foote, K. D., Greenberg, B. D., Ricciuti, N., Bauer, R., Ward, H., Shapira, N. A., Wu, S. S., Hill, C. L., Rasmussen, S. A., et al. (2010) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.11.028 · Cited by 362 · see citing works
Lozano, A. M., Giacobbe, P., Hamani, C., Rizvi, S. J., Kennedy, S. H., Kolivakis, T. T., Debonnel, G., Sadikot, A. F., Lam, R. W., Howard, A. K., et al. (2012) · Journal of Neurosurgery · doi:10.3171/2011.10.jns102122 · Cited by 356 · see citing works
Self-citationBergfeld, I. O., Mantione, M., Hoogendoorn, M. L. C., Ruhé, H. G., Notten, P., van Laarhoven, J., Visser, I., Figee, M., de Kwaasteniet, B. P., Horst, F., et al. (2016) · JAMA Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.0152 · Cited by 336 · see citing works
Self-citationBrain stimulation and brain lesions converge on common causal circuits in neuropsychiatric disease
Siddiqi, S. H., Schaper, F. L. W. V. J., Horn, A., Hsu, J., Padmanabhan, J. L., Brodtmann, A., Cash, R. F. H., Corbetta, M., Choi, K. S., Dougherty, D. D., et al. (2021) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-021-01161-1 · Cited by 296 · see citing works
Self-citationJiménez, F., Velasco, F., Salin-Pascual, R., Hernández, J. A., Velasco, M., Criales, J. L., & Nicolini, H. (2005) · Neurosurgery · doi:10.1227/01.neu.0000170434.44335.19 · Cited by 291 · see citing works
Covariation of activity in habenula and dorsal raphe nuclei following tryptophan depletion
Morris, J. S., Smith, K. A., Cowen, P. J., Friston, K. J., & Dolan, R. J. (1999) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1006/nimg.1999.0455 · Cited by 288 · see citing works
Stress models of depression: forming genetically vulnerable strains
Henn, F. A., & Vollmayr, B. (2005) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2005.03.019 · Cited by 274 · see citing works
Rauch, S. L., Dougherty, D. D., Malone, D., Rezai, A., Friehs, G., Fischman, A. J., Alpert, N. M., Haber, S. N., Stypulkowski, P. H., Rise, M. T., et al. (2006) · Journal of Neurosurgery · doi:10.3171/jns.2006.104.4.558 · Cited by 260 · see citing works
Treatment-resistant depression and suicidality
Bergfeld, I. O., Mantione, M., Figee, M., Schuurman, P. R., Lok, A., & Denys, D. (2018) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2018.04.016 · Cited by 256 · see citing works
Self-citationLateral habenula in the pathophysiology of depression
Yang, Y., Wang, H., Hu, J., & Hu, H. (2018) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2017.10.024 · Cited by 254 · see citing works
State-dependent responses to intracranial brain stimulation in a patient with depression
Scangos, K. W., Makhoul, G. S., Sugrue, L. P., Chang, E. F., & Krystal, A. D. (2021) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-020-01175-8 · Cited by 243 · see citing works
Puigdemont, D., Pérez‐Egea, R., Portella, M. J., Molet, J., de Diego-Adeliño, J., Gironell, A., Raduà, J., Gómez‐Ansón, B., Rodríguez, R. R., Serra-Blasco, M., et al. (2011) · The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1017/s1461145711001088 · Cited by 235 · see citing works
Shumake, J., Edwards, E., & Gonzalez-Lima, F. (2003) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0006-8993(02)04048-9 · Cited by 232 · see citing works
A tractography analysis of two deep brain stimulation white matter targets for depression
Gutman, D. A., Holtzheimer, P. E., Behrens, T. E. J., Johansen-Berg, H., & Mayberg, H. S. (2009) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2008.09.021 · Cited by 220 · see citing works
Self-citationThe lateral habenula in addiction and depression: an anatomical, synaptic and behavioral overview
Lecca, S., Meye, F. J., & Mameli, M. (2014) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/ejn.12480 · Cited by 196 · see citing works
Zald, D. H., Mattson, D. L., & Pardo, J. V. (2002) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.042457199 · Cited by 186 · see citing works
Ranft, K., Dobrowolny, H., Krell, D., Bielau, H., Bogerts, B., & Bernstein, H.-G. (2010) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291709990821 · Cited by 183 · see citing works
Superolateral medial forebrain bundle deep brain stimulation in major depression: a gateway trial
Coenen, V. A., Bewernick, B. H., Kayser, S., Kilian, H., Boström, J., Greschus, S., Hurlemann, R., Klein, M. E., Spanier, S., Sajonz, B., et al. (2019) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/s41386-019-0369-9 · Cited by 176 · see citing works
Lipsman, N., Lam, E., Volpini, M., Sutandar, K., Twose, R., Giacobbe, P., Sodums, D. J., Smith, G. S., Woodside, D. B., & Lozano, A. M. (2017) · The Lancet Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(17)30076-7 · Cited by 174 · see citing works
Schlaepfer, T. E., Bewernick, B. H., Kayser, S., Hurlemann, R., & Coenen, V. A. (2014) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/npp.2014.28 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
(2006) · PubMed · Cited by 159 · see citing works
Deep Brain Stimulation for Depression Informed by Intracranial Recordings
Sheth, S. A., Bijanki, K. R., Metzger, B., Allawala, A., Pirtle, V., Adkinson, J. A., Myers, J., Mathura, R. K., Oswalt, D., Tsolaki, E., et al. (2022) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2021.11.007 · Cited by 158 · see citing works
Anatomy and physiology of the basal ganglia: implications for DBS in psychiatry
Kopell, B. H., & Greenberg, B. D. (2008) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2007.07.004 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Self-citationBewernick, B. H., Kayser, S., Gippert, S. M., Switala, C., Coenen, V. A., & Schlaepfer, T. E. (2017) · Brain stimulation · doi:10.1016/j.brs.2017.01.581 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Hamani, C., Diwan, M., Isabella, S., Lozano, A. M., & Nobrega, J. N. (2010) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2009.12.010 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
Mantione, M., Nieman, D. H., Figee, M., & Denys, D. (2014) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291714000956 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Coenen, V. A., Schumacher, L. V., Kaller, C., Schlaepfer, T. E., Reinacher, P. C., Egger, K., Urbach, H., & Reisert, M. (2018) · NeuroImage Clinical · doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2018.03.019 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Deep brain stimulation of the medial forebrain bundle: Distinctive responses in resistant depression
Fenoy, A. J., Schulz, P., Selvaraj, S., Burrows, C., Spiker, D., Cao, B., Zunta-Soares, G., Gajwani, P., Quevedo, J., & Soares, J. (2016) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2016.05.064 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Fenoy, A. J., Schulz, P. E., Selvaraj, S., Burrows, C. L., Zunta-Soares, G., Durkin, K., Zanotti-Fregonara, P., Quevedo, J., & Soares, J. C. (2018) · Translational Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41398-018-0160-4 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Lim, L. W., Prickaerts, J., Huguet, G., Kadar, E., Hartung, H., Sharp, T., & Temel, Y. (2015) · Translational Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/tp.2015.24 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Deep brain stimulation induces striatal dopamine release in obsessive-compulsive disorder
Figee, M., de Koning, P., Klaassen, S., Vulink, N., Mantione, M., van den Munckhof, P., Schuurman, R., van Wingen, G., van Amelsvoort, T., Booij, J., et al. (2014) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2013.06.021 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Self-citationRole of the Brain's Reward Circuitry in Depression
Nestler, E. J. (2015) · International review of neurobiology · doi:10.1016/bs.irn.2015.07.003 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Crowell, A. L., Garlow, S. J., Riva-Posse, P., & Mayberg, H. S. (2015) · Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnint.2015.00041 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Self-citationNuttin, B. J., Gabriels, L., Kuyck, K. V., & Cosyns, P. (2003) · Neurosurgery Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/s1042-3680(02)00117-1 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Ramasubbu, R., Anderson, S., Haffenden, A., Chavda, S., & Kiss, Z. H. T. (2013) · Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience · doi:10.1503/jpn.120160 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Puigdemont, D., Portella, M. J., Pérez-Egea, R., Molet, J., Gironell, A., de Diego-Adeliño, J., Martín, A., Rodríguez, R., Àlvarez, E., Artigas, F., et al. (2015) · Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience · doi:10.1503/jpn.130295 · Cited by 100 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Results show that 3 out of 5 patients relapsed during cessation of treatment, further indicating a direct therapeutic effect of active SCC DBS [27].”
BackgroundVeerakumar, A., Tiruvadi, V., Howell, B., Waters, A. C., Crowell, A. L., Voytek, B., Riva-Posse, P., Denison, L., Rajendra, J. K., Edwards, J. A., et al. (2019) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00875.2018 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Self-citationRaymaekers, S., Luyten, L., Bervoets, C., Gabriëls, L., & Nuttin, B. (2017) · Translational Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/tp.2017.66 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Ramasubbu, R., Clark, D. L., Golding, S., Dobson, K. S., Mackie, A., Haffenden, A., & Kiss, Z. H. (2020) · The Lancet Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(19)30415-8 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
van der Wal, J. M., Bergfeld, I. O., Lok, A., Mantione, M., Figee, M., Notten, P., Beute, G., Horst, F., van den Munckhof, P., Schuurman, P. R., et al. (2020) · Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp-2019-321758 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Self-citationThe placebo effect: the good, the bad, and the ugly
Tavel, M. E. (2014) · The American Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2014.02.002 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Millet, B., Jaafari, N., Polosan, M., Baup, N., Giordana, B., Haegelen, C., Chabardes, S., Fontaine, D., Devaux, B., Yelnik, J., et al. (2014) · European Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.euroneuro.2014.05.006 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Blomstedt, P., Naesström, M., & Bodlund, O. (2017) · Clinical Case Reports · doi:10.1002/ccr3.856 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Low‐frequency deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease: Great expectation or false hope?
di Biase, L., & Fasano, A. A. (2016) · Movement Disorders · doi:10.1002/mds.26658 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Velasco, F., Velasco, M., Jiménez, F., Velasco, A. L., & Salin-Pascual, R. (2005) · Neurosurgery · doi:10.1227/01.neu.0000172172.51818.51 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
A new translational target for deep brain stimulation to treat depression
Kiening, K., & Sartorius, A. (2013) · EMBO Molecular Medicine · doi:10.1002/emmm.201302947 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Talbot, P. S., & Cooper, S. J. (2006) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/sj.npp.1301022 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Intraoperative neural signals predict rapid antidepressant effects of deep brain stimulation
Sendi, M. S. E., Waters, A. C., Tiruvadi, V., Riva-Posse, P., Crowell, A., Isbaine, F., Gale, J. T., Choi, K. S., Gross, R. E., S. Mayberg, H., et al. (2021) · Translational Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41398-021-01669-0 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Self-citationThe placebo-nocebo response: controversies and challenges from clinical and research perspective
Jakovljevic, M. (2014) · European Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.euroneuro.2013.11.014 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Zhang, C., Zhang, Y., Luo, H., Xu, X., Yuan, T.-F., Li, D., Cai, Y.-Y., Gong, H., Peng, D.-H., Fang, Y.-R., et al. (2022) · Translational Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41398-022-01818-z · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Eitan, R., Fontaine, D., Benoît, M., Giordana, C., Darmon, N., Israel, Z., Linesky, E., Arkadir, D., Ben-Naim, S., Iserlles, M., et al. (2018) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2017.09.026 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Connectivity-based parcellation of the anterior limb of the internal capsule
Nanda, P., Banks, G. P., Pathak, Y. J., & Sheth, S. A. (2017) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.23815 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Jiang, Z., Harati, S., Crowell, A., Mayberg, H. S., Nemati, S., & Clifford, G. D. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2020.3010472 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Self-citationGuinjoan, S. M., Mayberg, H. S., Costanzo, E. Y., Fahrer, R. D., Tenca, E., Antico, J. C., Cerquetti, D., Smyth, E., Leiguarda, R. C., & Nemeroff, C. B. (2010) · Journal of Neuropsychiatry · doi:10.1176/jnp.2010.22.3.265 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Self-citationTranslational research in OCD: circuitry and mechanisms
Haber, S. N., & Heilbronner, S. R. (2013) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/npp.2012.182 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Aaronson, S. T., Carpenter, L. L., Hutton, T. M., Kraus, S., Mina, M., Pages, K., Shi, L., West, W. S., & Sackeim, H. A. (2022) · Brain Stimulation · doi:10.1016/j.brs.2022.01.006 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
A Novel Framework for Network-Targeted Neuropsychiatric Deep Brain Stimulation
Allawala, A. B., Bijanki, K. R., Goodman, W. K., Cohn, J. F., Viswanathan, A., Yoshor, D., Borton, D. A., Pouratian, N., & Sheth, S. A. (2021) · Neurosurgery · doi:10.1093/neuros/nyab112 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
From bed to bench side: Reverse translation to optimize neuromodulation for mood disorders
Rudebeck, P. H., Rich, E. L., & Mayberg, H. S. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1902287116 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Self-citationSmart, O., Choi, K. S., Riva-Posse, P., Tiruvadi, V., Rajendra, J., Waters, A. C., Crowell, A. L., Edwards, J., Gross, R. E., & Mayberg, H. S. (2018) · Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fncom.2018.00043 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Self-citationA connectomic analysis of deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression
Zhu, Z., Hubbard, E., Guo, X., Barbosa, D. A. N., Popal, A. M., Cai, C., Jiang, H., Zheng, Z., Lin, J., Gao, W., et al. (2021) · Brain Stimulation · doi:10.1016/j.brs.2021.08.010 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Self-citationClark, D. L., Johnson, K. A., Butson, C. R., Lebel, C., Gobbi, D., Ramasubbu, R., & Kiss, Z. H. T. (2020) · Brain stimulation · doi:10.1016/j.brs.2020.03.006 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Germann, J., Mameli, M., Elias, G. J. B., Loh, A., Taha, A., Gouveia, F. V., Boutet, A., & Lozano, A. M. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2021.730931 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Rapid Antidepressant Effects of Deep Brain Stimulation and Their Relation to Surgical Protocol
Riva-Posse, P., Crowell, A. L., Wright, K., Waters, A. C., Choi, K., Garlow, S. J., Holtzheimer, P. E., Gross, R. E., & Mayberg, H. S. (2020) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2020.03.017 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Self-citationBewernick, B. H., Kilian, H. M., Schmidt, K., Reinfeldt, R. E., Kayser, S., Coenen, V. A., Markett, S., & Schlaepfer, T. E. (2018) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291718000296 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Klanker, M., Feenstra, M., Willuhn, I., & Denys, D. (2017) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2017.09.012 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Liebrand, L. C., Natarajan, S. J., Caan, M. W. A., Schuurman, P. R., van den Munckhof, P., de Kwaasteniet, B., Luigjes, J., Bergfeld, I. O., Denys, D., & van Wingen, G. A. (2020) · NeuroImage Clinical · doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2020.102363 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Puigdemont, D., Portella, M. J., Pérez-Egea, R., de Diego-Adeliño, J., Gironell, A., Molet, J., Duran-Sindreu, S., Álvarez, E., & Pérez, V. (2009) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.03.018 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Lack of clinical response to deep brain stimulation of the medial forebrain bundle in depression
Davidson, B., Giacobbe, P., Mithani, K., Levitt, A., Rabin, J. S., Lipsman, N., & Hamani, C. (2020) · Brain stimulation · doi:10.1016/j.brs.2020.06.010 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Monoamine oxidase inhibitors potentiate the effects of deep brain stimulation
Hamani, C., Giacobbe, P., Diwan, M., Balbino, E. S., Tong, J., Bridgman, A., Lipsman, N., Lozano, A. M., Kennedy, S. H., & Nobrega, J. N. (2012) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2012.12060754 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Aibar-Durán, J. Á., Rodríguez Rodríguez, R., de Diego Adeliño, F. J., Portella, M. J., Álvarez-Holzapfel, M. J., Martín Blanco, A., Puigdemont Campos, D., & Molet Teixidó, J. (2022) · Neurosurgery · doi:10.1227/neu.0000000000001739 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Sani, S., Busnello, J., Kochanski, R., Cohen, Y., & Gibbons, R. D. (2017) · Translational Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/tp.2017.145 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
McCall, M. V., Riva-Posse, P., Garlow, S. J., Mayberg, H. S., & Crowell, A. L. (2020) · Neurology Psychiatry and Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.npbr.2020.05.002 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Self-citationLicht, R. W. (2013) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2012.12.009 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
<title>Schaltenbrand-Wahren-Talairach-Tournoux brain atlas registration</title>
Nowinski, W. L., Fang, A., & Nguyen, B. T. (1995) · SPIE Proceedings · doi:10.1117/12.207607 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Using Mechanism of Action to Choose Medications for Treatment-Resistant Depression
Thase, M. E., & Schwartz, T. L. (2015) · The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry · doi:10.4088/jcp.14052wc1c · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Left versus right subcallosal cingulate deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression
Conroy, S. K., Malloy, S., Kelley, M. E., Filkowski, M. M., Trimble, R. M., Pirtle, M. E., Maher, A., Dreyer-Oren, S. E., Doucette, W. T., Roth, R. M., et al. (2021) · Personalized Medicine in Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.pmip.2021.100069 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Self-citationEggers, A. E. (2014) · Medical Hypotheses · doi:10.1016/j.mehy.2014.04.007 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Deep brain stimulation for obsessive-compulsive disorder: why anatomy matters
Figee, M., & Mayberg, H. (2021) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2021.06.011 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Bewernick, 2010, Nucleus accumbens deep brain stimulation decreases ratings of depression and anxiety in treatment-resistant depression, Biol Psychiatry, 67, 110, 10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.09.013 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Toward a personalized closed-loop stimulation of the visual cortex: Advances and challenges
Grani, F., Soto-Sánchez, C., Fimia, A., & Fernández, E. (2022) · Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fncel.2022.1034270 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
- Authors
- Figee, M., Riva-Posse, P., Choi, K. S., Bederson, L., Mayberg, H. S., & Kopell, B. H.
- Affiliations
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
- Corresponding author
- Figee, Martijn
- Venue
- Neurotherapeutics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-07
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1229-1245
- ISSN
- 1878-7479 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC9587188
- OpenAlex
- W4285043264
- Semantic Scholar
- 1fb69b72a96ebcc20085d4a3c500ad86fa028495
- Cited by
- 175
- References
- 112
- Citations by year
- 2026: 50 · 2025: 46 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 3
- FWCI
- 4.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Neurotherapeutics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
- Keywords
- deep brain stimulation, treatment-resistant depression, DBS targets, white matter tracts, tractography, antidepressant response, stimulation parameter optimization, adaptive stimulation, chronic depression
- MeSH terms
- Antidepressive Agents, Depression, Humans, Deep Brain Stimulation, Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant, White Matter
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-08.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-08.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review