Cited by 98Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesTreatment of Major Depression

Increased Amygdala Response to Positive Social Feedback in Young People with Major Depressive Disorder

Davey, Christopher G., Allen, Nicholas B., Harrison, Ben J., Yücel, Murat·2011·Biological Psychiatry

Abstract

Background Studies of depressed patients have demonstrated increased amygdala activation to negative affective stimuli. In this study, we used a paradigm that employed personally relevant social stimuli, which are known to strongly activate the amygdala, to test whether the amygdala demonstrated aberrant activity in depressed participants as they responded to stimuli with positive valence.Methods Nineteen patients with major depressive disorder, aged 15 to 24 years, were matched with 20 healthy control participants. They completed a novel functional magnetic resonance imaging task in which they received social feedback from people who they believed had evaluated them. Voxelwise statistical parametric maps of brain response to positive social feedback and to a control feedback condition were compared to test the hypothesis that differences in neural response between depressed and control participants would arise in the amygdala.Results Depressed participants showed increased neural response to the positive- versus control-feedback condition in the amygdala (p < .05, corrected). An exploratory analysis showed that depressed participants responded to faces from both feedback conditions with increased activity in regions subserving social appraisal (ventrolateral prefrontal cortex and inferior parietal cortex) and affective processing (pregenual anterior cingulate cortex and anterior insular cortex; p < .001, uncorrected).Conclusions Depressed patients responded to positive social feedback with increased amygdala activation, demonstrating that amygdala hyperresponsivity in depression is not restricted to negatively-valenced stimuli. The heightened sensitivity of depressed participants to social evaluation may help explain symptoms of depression such as social withdrawal.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.12.004

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Adolescents with depression showed heightened activation to positive social feedback in subcortical structures including the amygdala.

    “one study found that adolescents with depression showed heightened activation to positive social feedback in subcortical structures including the amygdala (Davey et al., 2011)”
  • One recent study observed reward-related amygdala hyperactivity in depressed participants, which is hard to square with the view that such hyperactivity produces depressive negative affect.

    “recently recent study demonstrated amygdala hyperactivity in response to rewards amongst depressed samples, a finding that fits less well with the idea that amygdala hyperactivity is responsible for the negative affect associated with depression [67].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 64 · Cited by 98

Authors
Davey, C. G., Allen, N. B., Harrison, B. J., & Yücel, M.
Affiliations
The University of Melbourne (AU)
Corresponding author
Davey, Christopher G.
Venue
Biological Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-04
Volume
69
Issue
8
Pages
734-741
ISSN
0006-3223 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1982398562
Cited by
98
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 11
FWCI
5.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Pfizer
  • National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) (628922)
  • Colonial Foundation
  • NHMRC Clinical Career Development Awards (628509, 509345)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
Keywords
major depressive disorder, social evaluation, adolescents, young adults, social withdrawal, ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, inferior parietal cortex, anterior insula, pregenual anterior cingulate cortex, face processing
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Affect, Amygdala, Analysis of Variance, Brain Mapping, Depressive Disorder, Major, Major Depressive Disorder, Emotions, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Social Perception, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review