Cited by 6Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMemory and Neural MechanismsNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Emotional Reactivity and Regulation in Panic Disorder: Insights from a Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

Shurick, Ashley A., Gross, James J.·2013·Biological Psychiatry

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biopsych.2012.10.008

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shurick, A. A., & Gross, J. J.
Affiliations
Stanford University (US)
Corresponding author
Shurick, Ashley A.
Venue
Biological Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-01
Volume
73
Issue
1
Pages
5-6
ISSN
0006-3223 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2139850793
Cited by
6
References
0
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 2
FWCI
0.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
panic disorder with agoraphobia, cognitive behavioral therapy, fear conditioning, emotional reactivity, emotion regulation, functional neuroimaging
MeSH terms
Brain, Conditioning, Classical, Fear, Female, Humans, Male, Panic Disorder

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review