The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Can Functional Decoding Elucidate Meta-analytic Brain Dysfunctions in Adult Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder?
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The fMRI findings parallel evidence from structural MRI studies for more abnormal basal ganglia deficits in childhood than adult ADHD (Norman et al., 2016; Rubia, 2016; Hoogman et al., 2017).”
From Cognitive Neuroscience of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and Its Clinical Translation (2018) · cites this paper as Rubia, 2016
Citations
Cites
Hart, H., Radua, J., Nakao, T., Mataix-Cols, D., & Rubia, K. (2013) · JAMA Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.277 · Cited by 764
Self-citationNoreika, V., Falter, C. M., & Rubia, K. (2013) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.09.036 · Cited by 339
Self-citationRubia, K., Alegria, A. A., Cubillo, A. I., Smith, A. B., Brammer, M. J., & Radua, J. (2014) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2013.10.016 · Cited by 315
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Cortese, 2016, Functional decoding and meta-analytic connectivity modeling in adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, Biol Psychiatry, 80, 896, 10.1016/j.biopsych.2016.06.014 · DOI · Paper page
- Rubia, 2009, Impulsiveness as a timing disturbance: Neurocognitive abnormalities in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder during temporal processes and normalization with methylphenidate, Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci, 364, 1919, 10.1098/rstb.2009.0014 · DOI · Paper page
- Hart, 2012, Meta-analysis of fMRI studies of timing functions in ADHD, Neuroscience Biobehav Rev, 36, 2248, 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.08.003 · DOI · Paper page
- Schlaug, 2015, Musicians and music making as a model for the study of brain plasticity, Prog Brain Res, 217, 37, 10.1016/bs.pbr.2014.11.020 · DOI
- Radua, 2014, Meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies indicates that an increase of cognitive difficulty during executive tasks engages brain regions associated with time perception, Neuropsychologia, 58, 14, 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.03.016 · DOI
- Norman, 2016, Comparative meta-analysis of functional and structural deficits in ADHD and OCD, JAMA Psychiatry, 73, 815, 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.0700 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Rubia, K. (2018) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2018.00100 · Cited by 384
“The fMRI findings parallel evidence from structural MRI studies for more abnormal basal ganglia deficits in childhood than adult ADHD (Norman et al., 2016; Rubia, 2016; Hoogman et al., 2017).”
BackgroundSelf-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Rubia, K.
- Affiliations
- King's College London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Rubia, Katya
- ORCID
- Rubia, Katya
- Venue
- Biological Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-12
- Volume
- 80
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 890-892
- ISSN
- 0006-3223 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2553664013
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 0.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Keywords
- adult ADHD, meta-analytic connectivity modeling, brain dysfunction, functional connectivity, inattention, impulsivity, neuroimaging correlates
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Attention, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Brain, Brain Diseases, Humans, Neuropsychological Tests
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
