Cited by 1Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlPosttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchPsychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

15. Respiratory Sinus Arrhythmia and Ventromedial Prefrontal Function in Veterans with Posttraumatic Stress Symptoms

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biopsych.2017.02.026

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Grupe, D., Wielgosz, J., Nitschke, J., & Davidson, R.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Venue
Biological Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-05
Volume
81
Issue
10
Pages
S7
ISSN
0006-3223 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2607953929
Cited by
1
References
0
Citations by year
2018: 1
FWCI
0.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
Keywords
respiratory sinus arrhythmia, ventromedial prefrontal cortex, post-traumatic stress disorder, veterans, parasympathetic activity, autonomic regulation, emotion regulation, posttraumatic stress symptoms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review