Cited by 1Functional Brain Connectivity StudiesMental Health Research TopicsTreatment of Major Depression

Unlocking the potential of effective connectivity as a neuroimaging biomarker: A path toward personalized depression treatment in youth

Hagan, Kelsey E.·2023·Biological Psychiatry

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biopsych.2023.09.010

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hagan, K. E.
Affiliations
Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
Corresponding author
Hagan, Kelsey E.
Venue
Biological Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-12
Volume
94
Issue
12
Pages
910-912
ISSN
0006-3223 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4388644030
Cited by
1
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 1
FWCI
0.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Office of Research on Women's Health (1K12HD108269-01)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
Keywords
effective connectivity, neuroimaging biomarkers, adolescent depression, personalized treatment, suicide risk, early-onset depression, young adults
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Depression, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Biomarkers, Neuroimaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review