The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The mismatch negativity in cognitive and clinical neuroscience: Theoretical and methodological considerations
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating?
Donchin, E., & Coles, M. G. H. (1988) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00058027 · Cited by 3,585
Picton, T. W., Bentin, S., Berg, P., Donchin, E., Hillyard, S. A., Johnson, R., Miller, G. A., Ritter, W., Ruchkin, D. S., Rugg, M. D., et al. (2000) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/1469-8986.3720127 · Cited by 2,157
Language-specific phoneme representations revealed by electric and magnetic brain responses
Näätänen, R., Lehtokoski, A., Lennes, M., Cheour, M., Huotilainen, M., Iivonen, A., Vainio, M., Alku, P., Ilmoniemi, R. J., Luuk, A., et al. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/385432a0 · Cited by 1,260
Attentive novelty detection in humans is governed by pre-attentive sensory memory
Tiitinen, H., May, P., Reinikainen, K., & Näätänen, R. (1994) · Nature · doi:10.1038/372090a0 · Cited by 637
Temporal window of integration revealed by MMN to sound omission.
Yabe, H., Tervaniemi, M., Reinikainen, K., & Näätänen, R. (1997) · NeuroReport · doi:10.1097/00001756-199705260-00035 · Cited by 313
Self-citation
Cited by
The mismatch negativity: a review of underlying mechanisms
Garrido, M. I., Kilner, J. M., Stephan, K. E., & Friston, K. J. (2009) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2008.11.029 · Cited by 1,441
“…special task requirements , independently of the subject's motivation and in the absence of attention, during sleep, or even before coma recovery, makes it particularly suitable for testing different clinical populations , infants and newborns (see Kujala et al., 2007, for a recent review ).”
BackgroundNewborn infants detect the beat in music
Winkler, I., Háden, G. P., Ladinig, O., Sziller, I., & Honing, H. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0809035106 · Cited by 599
Modeling the auditory scene: predictive regularity representations and perceptual objects
Winkler, I., Denham, S. L., & Nelken, I. (2009) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2009.09.003 · Cited by 559
Visual mismatch negativity: a predictive coding view
Stefanics, G., KremláÄek, J., & Czigler, I. (2014) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00666 · Cited by 340
Chobert, J., Francois, C., Velay, J.-L., & Besson, M. (2014) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhs377 · Cited by 313
Metadata
- Authors
- Kujala, T., Tervaniemi, M., & Schröger, E.
- Venue
- Biological Psychology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-01
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-19
- ISSN
- 0301-0511 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2054120497
- Cited by
- 505
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 10.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The mismatch negativity in cognitive and clinical neuroscience: Theoretical and methodological considerations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2006.06.001
- The paper
- Kujala, T., Tervaniemi, M., & Schröger, E. (2007). The mismatch negativity in cognitive and clinical neuroscience: Theoretical and methodological considerations. Biological Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2006.06.001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
