The DOI matches its Crossref record; 79 of the 79 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Modeling the auditory scene: predictive regularity representations and perceptual objects
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A theory of cortical responses.
Friston, K. (2005) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2005.1622 · Cited by 4,578
Visual search and stimulus similarity.
Duncan, J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1989) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.96.3.433 · Cited by 3,563
Näätänen, R., & Picton, T. (1987) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1987.tb00311.x · Cited by 3,321
Auditory Scene Analysis: The Perceptual Organization of Sound
Bregman, A. S. (1990) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/1486.001.0001 · Cited by 3,284
Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning.
Kawato, M. (1999) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/s0959-4388(99)00028-8 · Cited by 2,685
The mismatch negativity (MMN) in basic research of central auditory processing: A review
Näätänen, R., Paavilainen, P., Rinne, T., & Alho, K. (2007) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2007.04.026 · Cited by 2,644
Bar, M. (2004) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1476 · Cited by 1,613
The mismatch negativity: a review of underlying mechanisms
Garrido, M. I., Kilner, J. M., Stephan, K. E., & Friston, K. J. (2009) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2008.11.029 · Cited by 1,441
The proactive brain: using analogies and associations to generate predictions
Bar, M. (2007) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2007.05.005 · Cited by 1,144
The concept of auditory stimulus representation in cognitive neuroscience.
Näätänen, R., & Winkler, I. (1999) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.125.6.826 · Cited by 1,072
Self-citation
Cited by
Music training for the development of auditory skills
Kraus, N., & Chandrasekaran, B. (2010) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2882 · Cited by 1,115
Precise minds in uncertain worlds: Predictive coding in autism.
Van de Cruys, S., Evers, K., Van der Hallen, R., Van Eylen, L., Boets, B., de-Wit, L., & Wagemans, J. (2014) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0037665 · Cited by 885
Great Expectations: Is there Evidence for Predictive Coding in Auditory Cortex?
Heilbron, M., & Chait, M. (2018) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2017.07.061 · Cited by 428
Multimodal Language Processing in Human Communication
Holler, J., & Levinson, S. C. (2019) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2019.05.006 · Cited by 441
Evaluating the neurophysiological evidence for predictive processing as a model of perception
Walsh, K. S., McGovern, D. P., Clark, A., & O'Connell, R. G. (2020) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/nyas.14321 · Cited by 333
Metadata
- Authors
- Winkler, I., Denham, S. L., & Nelken, I.
- Venue
- Trends in Cognitive Sciences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-12
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 532-540
- ISSN
- 1364-6613 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2076931986
- Cited by
- 559
- References
- 79
- FWCI
- 1.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Modeling the auditory scene: predictive regularity representations and perceptual objects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.tics.2009.09.003
- The paper
- Winkler, I., Denham, S. L., & Nelken, I. (2009). Modeling the auditory scene: predictive regularity representations and perceptual objects. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2009.09.003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
