Cited by 115Memory and Neural MechanismsMemory Processes and InfluencesStress Responses and Cortisol

Context-dependent enhancement of declarative memory performance following acute psychosocial stress

Open access
Smeets, T., Giesbrecht, T., Jelicic, M., Merckelbach, H.·2007·Biological Psychology

Abstract

Studies on how acute stress affects learning and memory have yielded inconsistent findings, with some studies reporting enhancing effects while others report impairing effects. Recently, Joëls et al. [Joëls, M., Pu, Z., Wiegert, O., Oitzl, M.S., Krugers, H.J., 2006. Learning under stress: how does it work? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 152-158] argued that stress will enhance memory only when the memory acquisition phase and stressor share the same spatiotemporal context (i.e., context-congruency). The current study tested this hypothesis by looking at whether context-congruent stress enhances declarative memory performance. Undergraduates were assigned to a personality stress group (n=16), a memory stress group (n=18), or a no-stress control group (n=18). While being exposed to the acute stressor or a control task, participants encoded personality- and memory-related words and were tested for free recall 24h later. Relative to controls, stress significantly enhanced recall of context-congruent words, but only for personality words. This suggests that acute stress may strengthen the consolidation of memory material when the stressor matches the to-be-remembered information in place and time.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2007.07.001

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smeets, T., Giesbrecht, T., Jelicic, M., & Merckelbach, H.
Affiliations
Maastricht University (NL)
Corresponding author
Smeets, T.
Venue
Biological Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-09
Volume
76
Issue
1-2
Pages
116-123
ISSN
0301-0511 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1975097653
Cited by
115
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biological Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (452-02-006)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
Keywords
acute psychosocial stress, declarative memory, memory consolidation, free recall, word encoding
MeSH terms
Adult, Affect, Arousal, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Personality, Mental Recall, Retention, Psychology, Semantics, Stress, Psychological, Verbal Learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review