The DOI matches its Crossref record; 81 of the 81 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
State, not trait, neuroendocrine function predicts costly reactive aggression in men after social exclusion and inclusion
Abstract
Social exclusion increases aggressive behaviour, and the possible neuroendocrine underpinnings of the effect are largely unknown. Here, we examined the extent to which testosterone and cortisol responses to social exclusion would predict subsequent reactive aggression. Men were randomly assigned to a social exclusion (SE) or inclusion (SI) condition of 'Cyberball', a computer ball-toss game. Aggression was then measured using the Point Subtraction Aggression Paradigm (PSAP). Saliva was collected at three points for the measurement of testosterone and cortisol. Regression analyses indicated that testosterone concentrations 10-min into the PSAP (controlling for pre- and post-Cyberball testosterone) were positively correlated with aggressive behaviour, irrespective of SI/SE. Post hoc analyses for the conditions separately, however, suggested the relationship was stronger for SI men (R(2)(change)=13.3%, F(1,)(29)=5.28, p=0.03) than for SE men (R(2)(change)=1.8%, F(1,)(26)=0.49, p=0.49). Aggressive behaviour was also positively correlated with cortisol concentrations 10-min into the PSAP (controlling for pre- and post-Cyberball cortisol) irrespective of SE/SI. When both hormones were included in the regression model, the interaction of baseline 'Cortisol'×'Testosterone'×'Experimental Group' approached significance (R(2)(change)=5.4%, F(1,)(55)=3.53, p=0.07), but no significant effects were observed in either group alone. The findings add to evidence that individual differences in state neuroendocrine function map onto variability in human social behaviour.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This view is informed by the considerable number of Cyberball studies that have found strong exclusion effects in between-subjects designs where one group received only the inclusion condition and another group received both inclusion and exclusion rounds (Boyes & French, 2009; Carter-Sowell et al., 2008; Geniole et al., 2011; van Beest & Williams, 2006).”
From Risk-taking and social exclusion in adolescence: neural mechanisms underlying peer influences on decision-making (2013) · cites this paper as Geniole et al., 2011
Citations
Cites
The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation.
Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.117.3.497 · Cited by 23,245
Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Cohen, P., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2014) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781410606266 · Cited by 20,870
Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Kemp, F. (2003) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series D (The Statistician) · doi:10.1046/j.1467-9884.2003.t01-2-00383_4.x · Cited by 9,294
Anderson, C. A., & Bushman, B. J. (2002) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135231 · Cited by 3,915
Social determinants of health: the solid facts
Wilkinson, R. G., & Marmot, M. G. (2003) · University Libraries (University of Maryland) · doi:10.13016/yroj-yfcz · Cited by 2,826
Dodge, K. A., & Coie, J. D. (1987) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.53.6.1146 · Cited by 2,546
Social-information-processing factors in reactive and proactive aggression in children’s peer groups
Dodge, K. A., & Coie, J. D. (1987) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.53.6.1146 · Cited by 2,546
Cyberostracism: effects of being ignored over the Internet
Williams, K. D., Cheung, C. K. T., & Choi, W. (2000) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.748 · Cited by 2,276
Social Information-Processing Mechanisms in Reactive and Proactive Aggression
Crick, N. R., & Dodge, K. A. (1996) · Child Development · doi:10.2307/1131875 · Cited by 2,095
Williams, K. D. (2007) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085641 · Cited by 1,828
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Parsons, T. D. (2015) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2015.00660 · Cited by 837
“…as an experimentally controlled social exclusion assessment that elicits affective (Williams, 2007; Wesselmann et al., 2012), neurobiological (Eisenberger, 2012), psychophysiological (Gunther Moor et al., 2010; Sijtsema et al., 2011), and hormonal (Geniole et al., 2011; Zwolinski, 2012) responses.”
BackgroundCarré, J. M., & Olmstead, N. A. (2014) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.11.029 · Cited by 262
“…socially rejected vs. accepted) have provided additional support for the idea that acute changes in T during competition are positively correlated with human reactive aggression and antagonistic behavior (Carré et al., 2010; Geniole et al., 2011, 2013; see Carré et al., 2011 for review).”
Virtual Reality for Research in Social Neuroscience
Parsons, T. D., Gaggioli, A., & Riva, G. (2017) · Brain Sciences · doi:10.3390/brainsci7040042 · Cited by 268
“A notable example is the Cyberball game that has been used for multilevel and experimentally controlled assessments of social exclusion: at the neurobiological level [133], hormonal level [134,135], psychophysiological level [136,137], and the affective processing level [138,139].”
MethodThe dual-hormone hypothesis: a brief review and future research agenda
Mehta, P. H., & Prasad, S. (2015) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2015.04.008 · Cited by 224
The Oxford Handbook of Psychological Situations
(2017) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190263348.001.0001 · Cited by 203
Metadata
- Authors
- Geniole, S. N., Carré, J. M., & McCormick, C. M.
- Affiliations
- Brock University (CA)
- Duke University (US)
- Corresponding author
- McCormick, Cheryl M.
- Venue
- Biological Psychology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-04
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 137-145
- ISSN
- 0301-0511 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1971705777
- Cited by
- 129
- References
- 80
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 12.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Biological Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Canada Research Chairs
- Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
- Keywords
- social exclusion, social inclusion, reactive aggression, testosterone, cortisol, neuroendocrine function, individual differences, Cyberball, Point Subtraction Aggression Paradigm, aggression prediction, men
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Aggression, Analysis of Variance, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Male, Neurosecretory Systems, Predictive Value of Tests, Psychological Tests, Saliva, Social Behavior, Statistics as Topic, Testosterone, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review