Cited by 3,915Bullying, Victimization, and AggressionEmotions and Moral BehaviorSocial and Intergroup Psychology

Human Aggression

Anderson, Craig A., Bushman, Brad J.·2002·Annual Review of Psychology

Abstract

▪ Abstract Research on human aggression has progressed to a point at which a unifying framework is needed. Major domain-limited theories of aggression include cognitive neoassociation, social learning, social interaction, script, and excitation transfer theories. Using the general aggression model (GAM), this review posits cognition, affect, and arousal to mediate the effects of situational and personological variables on aggression. The review also organizes recent theories of the development and persistence of aggressive personality. Personality is conceptualized as a set of stable knowledge structures that individuals use to interpret events in their social world and to guide their behavior. In addition to organizing what is already known about human aggression, this review, using the GAM framework, also serves the heuristic function of suggesting what research is needed to fill in theoretical gaps and can be used to create and test interventions for reducing aggression.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135231

Cites

100 of 100 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Li et al. (2020) explain this using the General Aggression Model, which posits that those with child maltreatment experience normalize the utility of violence and form aggressive scripts that they use to deal with stressors and frustrations in their intimate relationships, thereby resulting in the perpetration of IPV.

    “The authors explain this using the General Aggression Model (Anderson & Bushman, 2002), which posits that those with child maltreatment experience normalize the utility of violence and “form aggressive scripts” that they use to deal with stressors and frustrations in their intimate relationships, thereby resulting in the perpetration of IPV.”
  • Routine activity theory proposes that high temperatures increase the frequency of interactions between people, raising the chance of interpersonal violence.

    “The prominent routine activity theory (RAT) proposed that high temperatures would likely increase the frequency of interactions between people, thereby raising the chance of interpersonal violence (Anderson and Bushman 2002).”

    From The impacts of climate change on violent conflict risk: a review of causal pathways (2024) · cites this paper as Anderson and Bushman 2002

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Anderson, C. A., & Bushman, B. J.
Affiliations
Iowa State University (US)
Venue
Annual Review of Psychology
Published
2002-02
Volume
53
Issue
1
Pages
27-51
ISSN
  • 0066-4308 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-2085
OpenAlex
W4212813690
Cited by
3,915
References
98
Citations by year
2026: 283 · 2025: 321 · 2024: 283 · 2023: 308 · 2022: 279 · 2021: 274 · 2020: 217 · 2019: 195 · 2018: 219 · 2017: 211 · 2016: 185 · 2015: 201 · 2014: 139 · 2013: 169 · 2012: 111
FWCI
6.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annual Review of Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
human aggression, General Aggression Model, social learning theory, social interaction theory, script theory, aggressive personality, personality development, cognition, affect, arousal, situational variables
MeSH terms
Affect, Aggression, Arousal, Cognition, Interpersonal Relations, Learning, Motivation, Psychological Theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review