The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Refining sweet sorghum to ethanol and sugar: economic trade-offs in the context of North China
Open accessAbstract
Reducing the use of non-renewable fossil energy reserves together with improving the environment are two important reasons that drive interest in the use of bioethanol as an automotive fuel. Conversion of sugar and starch to ethanol has been proven at an industrial scale in Brazil and the United States, respectively, and this alcohol has been able to compete with conventional gasoline due to various incentives. In this paper, we examined making ethanol from the sugar extracted from the juice of sweet sorghum and/or from the hemicellulose and cellulose in the residual sorghum bagasse versus selling the sugar from the juice or burning the bagasse to make electricity in four scenarios in the context of North China. In general terms, the production of ethanol from the hemicellulose and cellulose in bagasse was more favorable than burning it to make power, but the relative merits of making ethanol or sugar from the juice was very sensitive to the price of sugar in China. This result was confirmed by both process economics and analysis of opportunity costs. Thus, a flexible plant capable of making both sugar and fuel-ethanol from the juice is recommended. Overall, ethanol production from sorghum bagasse appears very favorable, but other agricultural residues such as corn stover and rice hulls would likely provide a more attractive feedstock for making ethanol in the medium and long term due to their extensive availability in North China and their independence from other markets. Furthermore, the process for residue conversion was based on particular design assumptions, and other technologies could enhance competitiveness while considerations such as perceived risk could impede applications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Fuel ethanol production: Process design trends and integration opportunities
Cardona, C. A., & Sánchez, Ó. J. (2007) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2007.01.002 · Cited by 1,032
Designing sorghum as a dedicated bioenergy feedstock
Rooney, W. L., Blumenthal, J., Bean, B., & Mullet, J. E. (2007) · Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining · doi:10.1002/bbb.15 · Cited by 710
Techno-economic analysis of lignocellulosic ethanol: A review
Gnansounou, E., & Dauriat, A. (2010) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2010.02.009 · Cited by 462
Self-citationConversion of Microalgae to Biofuel
Suali, E., & Sarbatly, R. (2012) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2012.03.047 · Cited by 456
Production of bioethanol from sweet sorghum: A review
Almodares, A., & Hadi, M. R. (2009) · African Journal of Agricultural Research · doi:10.5897/ajar.9000567 · Cited by 339
Metadata
- Authors
- Gnansounou, E., Dauriat, A., & Wyman, C. E.
- Venue
- Bioresource Technology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-06
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 985-1002
- ISSN
- 0960-8524 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2057984639
- Cited by
- 367
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Refining sweet sorghum to ethanol and sugar: economic trade-offs in the context of North China. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.biortech.2004.09.015
- The paper
- Gnansounou, E., Dauriat, A., & Wyman, C. E. (2005). Refining sweet sorghum to ethanol and sugar: economic trade-offs in the context of North China. Bioresource Technology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2004.09.015
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.